The above image claims that every major pipeline in the US cuts through Native American lands while avoiding white suburbs.
The text of the image states:
"It's interesting that every single big pipeline cuts right through the heart of Native American lands while completely bypassing white suburbs and golf courses. It's almost like they're doing it on purpose"
Is there any evidence to this claim?
No, not every single, 'big' pipeline passes through Native American lands. There are a lot of pipelines and they are arranged in a huge network, some terminating at both ends having never passed through Native American lands.
First, the claim is a bit weaselly. What is a 'big' pipeline? They don't define it. The US Department of Transportation (DOT) tracks all interstate pipelines and gathering lines. They don't manage intrastate lines, so I cannot speak on that. But since this claim is probably in reference the Keystone XL, we'll assume interstate pipelines. There are many factors that go into which pipelines the DOT tracks but generally it is 6" and up in size for low pressure systems.
As a local government official, I do have access to the USDOT GIS data of all 'major' hazard liquid and gas pipelines. Unfortunately, that GIS data is tied specifically to my person and there are explicit rules about how I use that data (for security reasons). I am a bit fuzzy on their position on sharing images, so would I feel uncomfortable sharing a US map of the pipelines. One way to describe what it looks like is a network of pipelines, not just a few spread around the US. A map of state highways and interstates is about the density of pipelines throughout most of the US.
As you can see from the image, there are a lot of 'big' pipelines that do not even pass through Native American Lands. Hard to see in this photo, but some lines make an effort to avoid passing through the Crow Reservation in southern Montana; no idea if this was due to protests, risk assessments, or avoid litigation.
Pipelines in the US with Native American Federal Lands superimposed.
You can view maps of pipelines by-county here: https://www.npms.phmsa.dot.gov/PublicViewer/
In finding the definition of what lines the DOT tracks, the map on the front cover of this PDF is very close to the data I have. https://www.npms.phmsa.dot.gov/Documents/Operator_Standards.pdf
I can't fully answer the title question but I will address part of the quote that it's based on in your post.
I'm not going to attack the whole statement but I will include some counter examples to part of it.
completely bypassing white suburbs and golf courses.
From a quick search here's an example of a pipeline through a golf course.
These sites, termed Early Construction Areas (ECAs), include several river and wetland complex crossings, and two miles of pipeline through the Lake Arrowhead Golf Course and an associated residential area
it's probably notable that golf courses tend to be less than 150 acres while reservations are up to 17341609 acres. So it can make golf courses easier to bypass.
Golf courses are also apparently not great for underground pipelines since the companies are often legally obliged to return the site to it's previous state if they need to dig for maintenance (expensive on a golf course) and golf courses sometimes do landscaping which can make damage to the pipeline more likely.
here's an example of a pipeline which burst in a suburb in Little Rock, Mayflower :
demographics of mayflower are 95.16% White
In terms of the other half of the quote, it's extremely hard to find a suitably clear example since even if a pipeline doesn't go anywhere near any official reservations it may still pass through land that native groups claim to be theirs or through land which isn't a reservation but does legally belong to citizens of native descent.
Some pipelines have little in the way of online information available about them without articles obviously talking about native protests related to them but that is merely absence of evidence.
