15

I've been seeing occasional studies go by about the use of anti-depressants in treating depression. Some seem to imply that they are at least over-prescribed (which may in itself not be all that bad, if the side effects are negligible), and that the primarily work by the placebo effect. Anybody know something definite on this?

  • It would be helpful to elaborate on what you have read. It saves us from reiterating what you have read, and most of all it helps you get a more specific and relevant answer! – Borror0 Mar 11 '11 at 3:09
  • The evidence base for different antidepressants is very different. Given that we closed the E-Number question I would also close this question and recommend to instead ask a question about a specific antidepressants. – Christian Mar 11 '11 at 12:44
24

Yes. Antidepressants have been around for more than fifty years and are effective in treating depressive disorders. They do absolutely work.

I've been seeing occasional studies.. ..that the[y] primarily work by the placebo effect.

I think I know where you might be getting this idea.....

Some members of the press and general public are questioning the efficacy of all antidepressants based on the conclusions of a 2010 meta-analysis* in which two antidepressants, Imipramine and Paroxetine, where used in the six studies analyzed. The analysis team concluded the following (emphasis mine):

“[E]fforts should be made to clarify to clinicians and prospective patients that whereas [antidepressant medication] can have a substantial effect with more severe depressions, there is little evidence to suggest . . . specific pharmacological benefit for the majority of patients with less severe acute depressions.”

Much of the confusion about the use of these drugs comes from using the term "depression" out of a medical context. There is a big difference between feeling depressed for a few days and having a depressive disorder. From the NIMH:

When a person has a depressive disorder, it interferes with daily life, normal functioning, and causes pain for both the person with the disorder and those who care about him or her.

Some general forms of depressive disorder (also from the NIMH)...

  • Major depressive disorder, also called major depression, is characterized by a combination of symptoms that interfere with a person's ability to work, sleep, study, eat, and enjoy once–pleasurable activities. Major depression is disabling and prevents a person from functioning normally.
  • Dysthymic disorder, also called dysthymia, is characterized by long–term (two years or longer) but less severe symptoms that may not disable a person but can prevent one from functioning normally or feeling well.
  • Psychotic depression, which occurs when a severe depressive illness is accompanied by some form of psychosis, such as a break with reality, hallucinations, and delusions.

*Meta-analysis can never follow the rules of science, for example being double-blind, controlled, or proposing a way to falsify the theory in question. It is only a statistical examination of scientific studies, not an actual scientific study, itself.


Anybody know something definite on this?

The Archives of General Psychiatry is an good starting point for researching the research.

Some random supporting research on antidepressants.....

Antidepressant classifications:

  1. Serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs)
  2. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)
  3. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs)
  4. Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs)
  • Second this. Apart from provably and observably working, one has to consider that most antidepressants have some quite serious and uncomfortable counter-effects. That's the major reason (besides having little or no effect on "normal" people) that there is zero abuse potential in them. No healthy person would take them. Yet, people with depressions do take them. Why would they? Because the drugs help them, and they help much more than the adverse effects impact them. – dm.skt Mar 11 '11 at 13:37
  • There's a further classification that I know of, namely NMDA antagonists. Ketamine is the best known member of this class. Ketamine has some effects that make it fairly unsuitable as a therapy in the community but it does hold out hope that other NMDA antagonists will be added to the antidepressant armoury. – user2466 May 14 '11 at 6:07
  • I have been reading a bit about all the buried and biased studies that was exposed a few years back. (rense.com/general81/1v.htm) Do you have any comments on that? – Nostrum Nov 15 '11 at 17:56
  • Here to add that studies which show negative effects never get published. This is the same with medicine. Its actually a huge problem – Xitcod13 Jan 12 '13 at 1:59

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .