Timeline for Do antidepressants work?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 27, 2019 at 16:53 | history | edited | Laurel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed/updated links
|
Jan 12, 2013 at 1:59 | comment | added | Xitcod13 | Here to add that studies which show negative effects never get published. This is the same with medicine. Its actually a huge problem | |
Nov 15, 2011 at 17:56 | comment | added | Nostrum | I have been reading a bit about all the buried and biased studies that was exposed a few years back. (rense.com/general81/1v.htm) Do you have any comments on that? | |
May 14, 2011 at 6:07 | comment | added | user2466 | There's a further classification that I know of, namely NMDA antagonists. Ketamine is the best known member of this class. Ketamine has some effects that make it fairly unsuitable as a therapy in the community but it does hold out hope that other NMDA antagonists will be added to the antidepressant armoury. | |
Mar 12, 2011 at 4:30 | vote | accept | David Thornley | ||
Mar 11, 2011 at 13:37 | comment | added | dm.skt | Second this. Apart from provably and observably working, one has to consider that most antidepressants have some quite serious and uncomfortable counter-effects. That's the major reason (besides having little or no effect on "normal" people) that there is zero abuse potential in them. No healthy person would take them. Yet, people with depressions do take them. Why would they? Because the drugs help them, and they help much more than the adverse effects impact them. | |
Mar 11, 2011 at 13:15 | history | answered | Rusty | CC BY-SA 2.5 |