5

This claim states that some of the foodstuff that leaves Japan is deemed unsafe there because of the radioactivity levels, and is exported to places with more lax restrictions, like the United States.

Japan exports food that surpasses its own safety levels.

  • 3
    On the face of it, this is very plausible given the proposed limits. – rjzii May 1 '13 at 22:09
  • Using google image search, it looks like the photo itself is about fish and radiation. nbcnews.com/id/49560936/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/… However, the woman is from the Thai government, not the Japanese government. – Andrew Grimm Sep 29 '13 at 6:52
  • Different limits also make sense. For 'background radioactivity' the threshold isn't for some particular item, but of your long-term(yearly?) exposure. If you have a lower background radiation throughout the whole year, then you wouldn't have to worry about minimizing minor radiation sources in your food; but if you already have near-dangerous levels, then it makes sense to strictly limit extra sources that are avoidable. – Peteris Mar 30 '14 at 18:39
8

It's possible that Japan is exporting food to the US that is above the Japanese maximum allowable limits and below the FDA limits, but the FDA has only found one sample of imported food from Japan that had detectable levels of gamma-ray emitting radionuclides and it was still below the FDA derived intervention level.


As of April 1, 2012, Japan's maximum allowed amounts for radioactive cesium in foods are (from New safety standards for radioactive cesium in food products go into effect):

  • 100 becquerels of radiation per kilogram of general foodstuffs such as fruit, vegetables, rice, seafood, or meat
  • 50 becquerels per kilogram of milk, baby food, or infant formula
  • 10 becquerels per kilogram of drinking water or tea leaves

In the US, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allows 1200 becquerels per kilogram in imported food. (Scientific American — Radioactive Fish Near Fukushima Suggest Ongoing Contamination, FDA — 560.750 Radionuclides in Imported Foods - Levels of Concern).

Regarding this difference, the NRC says (Scientific American):

The more restrictive action taken by the Japanese seems reasonable for the population living close to Fukushima because they receive radiation doses from other sources, including non-fish food, drinking water and land surface contamination.

The FDA has addressed the issue of importing food from Japan in FDA Response to the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Facility Incident.

To date, FDA has no evidence that radionuclides from the Fukushima incident are present in the U.S. food supply at levels that would pose a public health concern. This is true for both FDA-regulated food products imported from Japan and U.S. domestic food products, including seafood caught off the coast of the United States.

As of June 20th, 2012, FDA import investigators had performed 32,685 field examinations for radionuclide contamination. FDA had tested 1313 samples, 199 which were seafood or seafood products. 1312 samples had no Iodine-131, Cesium-134, Cesium-137, or other gamma-ray emitting radionuclides of concern. 1 sample was found to contain detectable levels of Cesium, but was below the established Derived Intervention Level (DIL) and posed no public health concern. (Test results)

  • 5
    and even those US limits are far lower than what's actually harmful... – jwenting Sep 29 '13 at 13:00

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .