The roll out of smart meters is well on its way in the UK. In this article it is claimed that smart meters will cost each household 420 pounds. Apparently, this money will be taken from each customers energy bill. In the article I couldn't understand how exactly this charge is calculated and in what way it is added to the bill.

Will smart meters cost each UK household 420 pounds?

  • 11
    That's from a sensationalist tabloid rag, the Daily Mail. As a quick, simple and reliable guideline, you can take any sensational claim it makes to be grossly exaggerated, to the point of being misleading or outright false. – EnergyNumbers Dec 5 at 10:44
  • 2
    Well, yes, they can and have done in the past. But in this case, they're taking gross cost, and ignoring the benefits. As the detail in the article says, after gross costs and gross benefits are netted off, there is a net benefit to households, estimated at £23 per year. – EnergyNumbers Dec 5 at 10:50
  • 1
    @EnergyNumbers Having had a "smart meter" installed (forcibly, Dutch government mandated them for all homes a few years ago) I can say there's been no benefit to me except no longer having to fumble around looking for the amount of electricity I've used to report it to the utility company once a year. As a household will not magically use less electricity because they have a different meter, claiming they're going to save money simply from having them is simply not true. – jwenting Dec 5 at 11:54
  • 4
    @jwenting data on its own can't achieve anything. It's only useful if it's in the hands of a capable user. Most people with smart meters save money. On average, people with smart meters save money. Not all do. Not all horses that are led to water, will drink. – EnergyNumbers Dec 5 at 11:59
  • 1
    "I couldn't understand how exactly this charge is calculated": My reading of the article is: The initial cost to the supplier will be £420. The savings to the supplier will be £13 per annum. The savings to the customer (if they improve behaviours) might be as low as £10 (but see related question). They assume the supplier will raise the cost of electricity to cover the initial outlay, quoting a recent 10% rise (averaging £104) as evidence. [None of this should be read as support for their figures; just a summary of their claims.] – Oddthinking Dec 5 at 13:50

The UK smart meter programme is likely to cost households hundreds of pounds

The cost of the smart meter programme in the UK is supposed to be paid for by increased electricity costs in general not by a specific levy for meters added to their bills.

The Daily Mail report is not as sensationalist as one might expect of that typically sensationalist tabloid. Previous sources have similar but slightly lower estimates (for example this report in 2016 from The Register).

However, this cost is the cost of installing the meters and ignores any possible benefits from their use. The controversy over them has come because the estimated benefits are much more uncertain than the installation costs (and, possibly, because some of the benefits accrue to the suppliers not the consumer).

A 2017 update from The Register says the following:

Cost-benefit estimates for the British smart meter programme vary hugely, with figures ranging from modest savings of around £26 a year (as we reported last year) to the Mail on Sunday’s latest guess [less than £10/year] coming from Gordon Hughes, an economist at the University of Edinburgh.

The introduction of the smart meter is a dog's breakfast. At best it is misconceived and an astonishingly expensive project. For those claiming it will bring major savings, I say they need to grow up,” Hughes dutifully raged for the Sunday newspaper...

...Four years ago a British report revealed that the cost of installing smart meters in the UK is £390 per household, while more recent estimates are that the benefits are now as low as £11 per household, agreeing with the University of Edinburgh’s Hughes’ estimates to the Mail on Sunday. All costs for installing the UK smart meter network, from the backend systems to the consumer unit in your home, are met by hiking up your gas and electricity bills.

Just before the rollout started one advisor to the government (Alex Henney) wrote this (quoted on thisismoney.co.uk, a Daily Mail site:

In a written statement to the Parliamentary Energy and Climate Change Committee four years ago – a year before smart meters started to be installed – he wrote: 'The British roll-out of smart meters is one of the most incompetent, one of the most expensive, and definitely the most complex.

'The project is likely to be a shambles with negligible consumer benefit.'

Henney stated civil servants 'cooked the books' to give meters a net benefit of almost £5billion – but independent analysis found it would end up costing the nation at least £4billion.

So the Daily Mail are not grossly out in saying the cost is £420/household but have ignored the benefits. On the other hand there is a very significant controversy over what the benefits are, hence the heated debate (see this question: Do "smart meters" bring about any significant savings?). Whether consumers are better off in the long term is unclear and whether the UK rollout plans are focussing on the things that will maximise the benefits for consumers is a significant part of that uncertainty.

  • 2
    You are using the source that made the notable claim as one of the sources which prove the claim is true. That seems pretty circular to me. – redleo85 Dec 5 at 13:27
  • 2
    @redleo85 Strictly speaking, no I'm not. I quoted some other material from that source but the material provides additional insight into what is being claimed and quotes relevant parliamentary evidence that is independently verifiable (though I admit I didn't check it). My other quotes come from independent sources. – matt_black Dec 5 at 13:31
  • "...there is a very significant controversy over what the benefits..." Related: skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/42902/… – jean Dec 5 at 13:39
  • The link you provided for "A 2017 update from The Register" does not contain the quote listed. In fact, the link appears to be identical to the one used for "this report in 2016 from The Register". I suspect the same URL was accidentally reused, can you update with the correct link? – Kamil Drakari Dec 5 at 15:16
  • 2
    I would note that The Register is not 100% reliable - quoting the source of data would be useful. – Mark Dec 5 at 21:10

An official estimate for households with meters that support both electricity and gas is 7% lower than the unsourced estimate.

Given different estimation techniques might lead to different figures, I consider the answer to the questions to be "Yes, close enough for a tabloid article" but opinions on accuracy might differ.


In November 2018, the UK's National Audit Office (NAO) released a report, Rolling out smart meters that took a critical look at the progress of the deployment.

(This snippet is from the press release, but very similar text appears in the report.)

In 2016 the Department expected the cost of the programme to be £11 billion and estimated it would bring economic benefits of £16.7 billion. The costs are equivalent to £374 per dual fuel household (in total, rather than annually). The NAO has, however, found the £11 billion figure underestimates the true cost of rolling out smart meters, which has since increased by at least £0.5 billion, equivalent to an extra £17 per household. The Department expects these costs to be more than offset by cost savings for industry and consumers.

£374 + £17 = £391, which is slightly less than the claimed £420.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .