Timeline for Were more Indian freedom fighters killed Muslims than any other religion/caste?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
17 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 16, 2022 at 14:06 | comment | added | LangLаngС | @IMSoP Even more: Does this writer in tag line exist? (Spelling variations? Search for him…) Did he say that/write that (or did anyone)? (Where/how are the names that are inscribed identified as so&so? [What are "backward Hindus","from RSS" ?] // While quite complex, & a whole list, all these points are so closely connected they should be addressable in one post, albeit a bit longer than what we got so far. Ideally showing from high quality sources which particulars are true, could be true, are probably distorted, exagerrated, or guaranteed made-up/lies. | |
Aug 16, 2022 at 13:11 | comment | added | IMSoP | The more I think about it, the more different claims I see that can be pulled from this one image. 1) 95,300 names are inscribed on the India Gate; 2) these are the names of Freedom Fighters; 3) 61,935 of these are identifiable as Muslim, and so on for the other numbers; 4) these numbers show something about the proportion of Muslims involved, or killed (as opposed to, for instance, matching the proportions in the region as a whole at the time). To me, (3) and (4) seemed the most significant, but Oddthinking (and the sources they found) focuses on (2). | |
Aug 16, 2022 at 12:04 | comment | added | days of love iff good genes | @Oddthinking: perhaps. But maybe (some) Muslims are unhappy with the official/legal definitions? The Deccan Herald seems to list different peopple/heroes than gulfnews.com/opinion/op-eds/… | |
Aug 16, 2022 at 11:57 | comment | added | Oddthinking♦ | @Fizz: I just addressed this in my answer. I think this term is perfectly clear to the Indian audience. | |
Aug 16, 2022 at 11:46 | comment | added | days of love iff good genes | @Oddthinking: The problem with this Q is that the poster itself doesn't define "freedom fighters". The (1857–1947) range was added by the OP. | |
Aug 16, 2022 at 9:58 | history | edited | LangLаngС | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
the claim seems rather obviously not 'taking part' but 'paid price in blood'…
|
Aug 16, 2022 at 9:11 | history | edited | JRE | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
Aug 16, 2022 at 1:30 | comment | added | Oddthinking♦ | @JoeW: Because there will always be newbies, and we want to be welcoming while they learn. | |
Aug 15, 2022 at 15:51 | comment | added | Joe W | @Oddthinking I don't see why others have to do a minimum amount of research instead of the person asking the question. | |
Aug 15, 2022 at 15:21 | comment | added | Oddthinking♦ | @JoeW: "If you suspect that a claim is not notable, you should perform a minimum amount of research before acting. Performing a quick google search using search terms taken from the question is a good idea. If you don't find any evidence of notability that way, you should comment on the question and vote to close or flag as inappropriate. [...]" -Source | |
Aug 15, 2022 at 15:05 | comment | added | Joe W | @Oddthinking It may be a popular meme but we should require more then posting it on the site with a comment saying that it is something that the poster has seen. | |
Aug 15, 2022 at 14:17 | history | edited | Laurel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 401 characters in body; edited title
|
Aug 15, 2022 at 14:05 | review | Close votes | |||
Aug 22, 2022 at 3:01 | |||||
Aug 15, 2022 at 13:59 | comment | added | Oddthinking♦ | @JoeW: ?? A quick search reveals it is a popular meme, with multiple variants. The war memorial may not be making such a claim, but the meme is making several. | |
Aug 15, 2022 at 13:51 | answer | added | Oddthinking♦ | timeline score: 4 | |
Aug 15, 2022 at 13:45 | comment | added | Joe W | There does not appear to be a notable claim and a list of names on a war memorial does not appear making any sort of claim about the makeup of the freedom fighters. | |
Aug 15, 2022 at 13:38 | history | asked | Simon Park | CC BY-SA 4.0 |