Skip to main content
17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 16, 2022 at 14:06 comment added LangLаngС @IMSoP Even more: Does this writer in tag line exist? (Spelling variations? Search for him…) Did he say that/write that (or did anyone)? (Where/how are the names that are inscribed identified as so&so? [What are "backward Hindus","from RSS" ?] // While quite complex, & a whole list, all these points are so closely connected they should be addressable in one post, albeit a bit longer than what we got so far. Ideally showing from high quality sources which particulars are true, could be true, are probably distorted, exagerrated, or guaranteed made-up/lies.
Aug 16, 2022 at 13:11 comment added IMSoP The more I think about it, the more different claims I see that can be pulled from this one image. 1) 95,300 names are inscribed on the India Gate; 2) these are the names of Freedom Fighters; 3) 61,935 of these are identifiable as Muslim, and so on for the other numbers; 4) these numbers show something about the proportion of Muslims involved, or killed (as opposed to, for instance, matching the proportions in the region as a whole at the time). To me, (3) and (4) seemed the most significant, but Oddthinking (and the sources they found) focuses on (2).
Aug 16, 2022 at 12:04 comment added days of love iff good genes @Oddthinking: perhaps. But maybe (some) Muslims are unhappy with the official/legal definitions? The Deccan Herald seems to list different peopple/heroes than gulfnews.com/opinion/op-eds/…
Aug 16, 2022 at 11:57 comment added Oddthinking @Fizz: I just addressed this in my answer. I think this term is perfectly clear to the Indian audience.
Aug 16, 2022 at 11:46 comment added days of love iff good genes @Oddthinking: The problem with this Q is that the poster itself doesn't define "freedom fighters". The (1857–1947) range was added by the OP.
Aug 16, 2022 at 9:58 history edited LangLаngС CC BY-SA 4.0
the claim seems rather obviously not 'taking part' but 'paid price in blood'…
Aug 16, 2022 at 9:11 history edited JRE CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Aug 16, 2022 at 1:30 comment added Oddthinking @JoeW: Because there will always be newbies, and we want to be welcoming while they learn.
Aug 15, 2022 at 15:51 comment added Joe W @Oddthinking I don't see why others have to do a minimum amount of research instead of the person asking the question.
Aug 15, 2022 at 15:21 comment added Oddthinking @JoeW: "If you suspect that a claim is not notable, you should perform a minimum amount of research before acting. Performing a quick google search using search terms taken from the question is a good idea. If you don't find any evidence of notability that way, you should comment on the question and vote to close or flag as inappropriate. [...]" -Source
Aug 15, 2022 at 15:05 comment added Joe W @Oddthinking It may be a popular meme but we should require more then posting it on the site with a comment saying that it is something that the poster has seen.
Aug 15, 2022 at 14:17 history edited Laurel CC BY-SA 4.0
added 401 characters in body; edited title
Aug 15, 2022 at 14:05 review Close votes
Aug 22, 2022 at 3:01
Aug 15, 2022 at 13:59 comment added Oddthinking @JoeW: ?? A quick search reveals it is a popular meme, with multiple variants. The war memorial may not be making such a claim, but the meme is making several.
Aug 15, 2022 at 13:51 answer added Oddthinking timeline score: 4
Aug 15, 2022 at 13:45 comment added Joe W There does not appear to be a notable claim and a list of names on a war memorial does not appear making any sort of claim about the makeup of the freedom fighters.
Aug 15, 2022 at 13:38 history asked Simon Park CC BY-SA 4.0