Timeline for Was John F Kennedy accidentally shot by a secret service agent?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Aug 23, 2019 at 15:34 | comment | added | Roger | Somewhat related: Did the U.S. Army intentionally subject President Calvin Coolidge to chlorine gas? skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/32983/… | |
| Aug 22, 2019 at 3:14 | comment | added | Ray Butterworth | Note that this question was recently changed from "Is there any merit to this claim?" to "Was Kennedy shot by his secret service agent?". The original question was effectively impossible to answer while staying within the rules of this site. (I know, I tried, and failed miserably.) The new question is now definitely impossible to answer. Perhaps it should be deleted? | |
| Aug 21, 2019 at 16:01 | history | edited | Oddthinking♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
| Oct 22, 2018 at 1:15 | history | protected | CommunityBot | ||
| Jul 11, 2017 at 13:30 | comment | added | PoloHoleSet | I figured that much, which is why I linked the article. I was not especially familiar with this claim, in and of itself, though my initial thought was "wouldn't someone had seen or heard that shot being discharged?" No worries, though, if this one is deemed "debunked," I'm sure there will be another completely new theory put forward by someone. After all, there's a lot of money to be made pushing alternatives in books. | |
| Jul 11, 2017 at 7:21 | comment | added | Anders | @PoloHoleSet Well, I guess what I am interested in then are this theories "own set of implausibilities", which the article you linked to does a good job of listing. | |
| Jul 10, 2017 at 15:08 | comment | added | PoloHoleSet | No, Anders, my answer was "the evidence matches the Warren conclusions as close to exactly as one could expect" - which is different than concluding it is possible. The reason why that is important is because this claim, which makes many leaps and assumptions and has its own set of implausibilities, depends on the Warren Commission conclusions being implausible in order to have any credence. philly.com/philly/news/… | |
| Jul 8, 2017 at 9:16 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSkeptic/status/883615849634033665 | ||
| Jul 8, 2017 at 7:40 | comment | added | Anders | @Oddthinking The answers are basically "The conclusion of the Warren investigation is plausible." What I am interested in here is basically if this version is equally plausible, or if it can be easily discredited somehow. | |
| Jul 8, 2017 at 3:10 | comment | added | Oddthinking♦ | Do the answers of that other question not also address this one? | |
| Jul 8, 2017 at 2:35 | history | edited | Brythan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jul 7, 2017 at 22:16 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 8, 2017 at 2:37 | |||||
| Jul 7, 2017 at 22:12 | comment | added | Anders | Yes, I am aware of this question, but I do not think it's a duplicate. This is a much, much more specific question. Also, Bonar does not deny that Oswald also shot the president. | |
| Jul 7, 2017 at 22:11 | history | asked | Anders | CC BY-SA 3.0 |