Fox News links to the CDC source which says:
CDC estimates that so far this season there have been at least 34 million flu illnesses, 350,000 hospitalizations and 20,000 deaths from flu.
By "season" they mean the 2019/2020 season. For data on past seasons, see here.
Note the illnesses vs deaths here which gives a mortality rate of 0.05%.
The usual ...
A recent study has suggested that effectiveness of placebo treatments increased over the years in the US, in patients suffering from neuropathic pain.
Increasing placebo responses over time in U.S. clinical trials of neuropathic pain, Pain, December 2015 - Volume 156 - Issue 12 - p 2616–2626
The study itself uses data ...
Electronic cigarettes may not be harmless but they are clearly much less harmful than cigarettes
Public Health England (PHE) produced a review of e-cigs in the middle of 2015 which came to this conclusion:
The role and impact of electronic cigarettes has been one of the great debates in public health in recent years and we commissioned this independent ...
I'd like to tackle a few sets of claims/arguments Wodarg makes in the two videos:
(Unknown) baseline prevalence of corona virus infections.
Excess mortality / "we wouldn't see anything special"
Comparison with Swine Flu when Wodarg was public health officer
(Unknown) baseline prevalence of CoV
The Glasgow paper he refers to did not look at the general ...
We can be extremely confident that a novel virus is spreading and being correctly detected by our tests
I'm only going to address claim 2, because the other claims are likely correct but essentially irrelevant because if claim 2 is false the chain of reasoning promptly falls apart.
The protocol discussed was tested, and designed, for sensitivity
You can ...
Denise Minger posted a rebuttal at Will Red Meat Kill You? Although she is not a scientist, her article breaks down the arguments against red meat in a very straightforward manner, such that a non-scientist can judge their validity without needing a Ph.D. The points made are:
The quoted study is purely observational, and based on people filling out a survey ...
In 2009, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) did a chemical analysis of several products from two leading brands of electronic cigarette.
What they found was disturbing. Here are some excerpted points:
DPA's analysis of the electronic cigarette samples showed that the product contained detectable levels of known carcinogens and toxic chemicals ...
The number of confirmed deaths due to influenza has been much less than 20,000 for the 2019-2020 flu season through March 5th 2020.
According the the US National Center for Health Statistics, the weekly data for influenza deaths so far this season (through the 8th week of 2020) is as follows:
40 (2019) 16
No, there is not currently an epidemic of cancer. Instead, cancer rates appear to be holding steady over the long term while other causes of death are dropping dramatically. This appears to be the reason that cancer is now the leading cause of death in developed countries, rather than because cancer rates are rising significantly.
In searching for better ...
The basic answer is: we don't know. If you look at the original paper, you will find table 2, which shows that the number of people in the Apollo Lunar Astronauts group was 7 (n=7). Of those, 43% (or a total of 3) died from cardiovascular disease. In general you can't use such small sample sizes to draw conclusions in this sort of situation.
According to ...
Here are the raw numbers claimed in the article:
From 2000 to the end of 2010, Texas’s estimated maternal mortality rate hovered between 17.7 and 18.6 per 100,000 births. But after 2010, that rate had leaped to 33 deaths per 100,000, and in 2014 it was 35.8.
The study these numbers are based on can be found here. The relevant graph was also posted to ...
The actual research paper Stem cell divisions, somatic mutations, cancer etiology, and cancer prevention Science 24 Mar 2017:
Vol. 355, Issue 6331, pp. 1330-1334 says:
It is now widely accepted that cancer is the result of the gradual accumulation of driver gene mutations that successively increase cell proliferation (1–3). But what causes these ...
While it likely depends on definitions of mental disorder and the diagnostic procedure (especially on the eve of a new edition of the DSM), this number is not too high. It is too low.
R.V. Bijl á A. Ravelli á G. van Zessen, Prevalence of psychiatric disorder in the general population:
results of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey
and Incidence Study (...
Depends on what you mean by "better", and what you mean by electronic cigarette.
The FDA report that Oddthinking links to addresses the question of whether e-cigarrettes are useful as an aid to kicking nicotine, and I think that the fair answer to that is probably not: e-cig marketing doesn't seem to focus on ceasing to inhale nicotine into your lungs, it ...
The thinking is that disrupted sleep results in lower melatonin production which through some unknown mechanism might make the body more vulnerable to the cancers.
This is classical clickbait. Even from the bit of the study that they gave, you can see that it was about the health problems of bad sleeping, caused by too much light in the night and possible ...
There is good evidence that smoking bans reduce the number of heart attacks. In the meta-analysis "Cardiovascular effect of bans on smoking in public places: a systematic review and meta-analysis" published in 2009 in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology the authors state in their conclusion
Using 11 reports from 10 study locations, AMI risk ...
The meta-analysis and the Guardian article are not talking about the same thing.
The specific Guardian claim is [my emphasis]:
thousands of unnecessary strokes and heart attacks have occurred ... more than 4,000 premature deaths per year
The scientific article you link says:
In this systematic review of 9 unique studies of 479 unique patients with ...
In short: No. But it is a bit more complicated than that.
It is probably a bad way to phrase it like "The more alcohol a society consumes, the fewer alcohol-related problems and alcohol-related deaths (including cirrhosis) it has, […]"
This is likely to be a journalistic creativity that as usual cannot make head or tail of the logic of an argument.
If you ...
When one reviews the comments of the Director General report of IAEA in Aug 2015 to the Tsuda et.al's study, there are valid issues noted which will need to be addressed in the future by Tsuda et.al regarding children living near the Fukushima nuclear meltdown affected by thyroid cancers at a rate 20 to 50 times when compared to children elsewhere .
Different theories have emerged to hypothesize about origins for the human immunodeficiency infection (HIV) and (AIDS), with theories emerging from coincidental acts to evidently intentional acts.
The Oral Polio Vaccine (OPV) theory is one of those theories.
Edward Hooper, is a British writer best known for his book, The River, which investigated the ...
If anything, some studies suggest that the present measurement methods underestimate the effects:
A reanalysis of the data by Willis et al, restricted to people who live closer to the monitor, reported a doubling of the estimate slope per unit exposure, suggesting substantial downward bias by classical measurement error.
The OP argues below that
Besides Dr. Aidely excellent points on PCR reliability and the tracing of covid-19 trees, there is another (very) weak point in Dr. Wodarg's arguement. His claim (#3) is that we know almost nothing about the illnesses these other/existing coronaviruses cause. But that's not really the case:
Coronaviruses are enveloped RNA viruses that are distributed ...
The short answer is "yes".
Here is another description of (I think) the same studies from Leonard Mlodinow's "The Drunkard's Walk":
[...] in studies in Germany and the United States, researchers asked physicians to estimate the probability that an asymptomatic woman between the ages of 40 and 50 who has a positive mammogram actually has ...
If the question is:
Are the Apollo astronauts experiencing heart disease at a higher than average rate?
The answer is possibly, but the data is not rock-solid.
Otherwise, if you ask if the following is true:
Apollo astronauts dying of heart disease at 4-5X the rate of normal humans
This is a misreading of the original study, and is false strictly ...
Yes there is an effect but it may not be as large as early studies suggested with a result of reducing heart attacks by 3-4% in some population subgroups
The trouble with science in areas where there is a broad consensus is that many people don't check their results carefully when they agree with the consensus view. And when those results can be used as ...
It may be true or true-ish among some sub-populations.
THE PROSTITUTE PARADOX from 1993 says,
In New York City, for example, 40 to 50 percent of streetwalkers (a very low caste of prostitute) who have used IV drugs over the past
decade are HIV seropositive.
Among call girls in New York City (a higher caste of prostitute), no seropositivity was ...
The newspaper headlines exaggerate the paper's conclusions, but they, in turn, are not justified by the data shown
The paper itself does not make any attempt to measure the occurrence of specific dementias but uses a standard test for cognitive performance to measure its outcomes:
The current study examined the shape of the association between alcohol ...
The premise behind the article seems to be that SARS was widely prevalent (in some areas), >10% of people were infected, without severe symptoms, and developed antibodies that can now be tested for.
A 2006 systematic review looked at this:
Seroprevalence of IgG antibodies to SARS-coronavirus in asymptomatic or subclinical population groups