The study by Orb Media was subject for articles in German news website Spiegel Online (commercial) and WDR (public service broadcasting). Both articles, quoting staff from the German Federal Environmental Agency, agree on criticism of the study:
The study does a "plastic / no plastic" rating, without actually going into how many particles were found.
Summary: The survey this article was based on was biased, poorly designed and poorly implemented. The conclusions cannot be trusted.
This study was examined by Orac who has been "checking in with and covering periodically ever since its inception in 2012, when antivaxers were fundraising for it."
The study has had a history of being retracted:
It's going to depend upon the type of plastic you're using, as they're composed of different chemical compounds. If you look at the bottom of your plastic cup (or dish, etc), there's normally a recycling symbol and a number. The number classifies the type of plastic it is.
You can find the plastic classification numbers here.
My opinion as an ...
The 'cactus absorb radiation' meme is very widespread, but seems very short on detailed analysis. So let's start with some basic facts.
None of the articles are explicit about what radiation they are talking about. However the only significant radiation emitted by computer monitors is electromagnetic radiation, which is all around us all the time, and in ...
Toxicity: 30–60 mg (0.5–1.0 mg/kg) can be a lethal dosage for adult humans.
As a rough estimate, a horse can be 400kg, so a lethal does of 200mg-400mg for a horse. Density from wikipedia 1.01 g/cm³.
This means a lethal dose would take up 0.25-0.5 cm³ which is a drop of diameter 0.8-1 cm. This is quite a large drop, approximately 5-10times the dose you ...
Typically No, but it depends on the dose.
The World Health Organisation released a fairly comprehensive report (PDF Warning) called "Fluoride in Drinking-water" that covers this topic.
I apologise for quoting so extensively from this report, but, well, it's excellent. I'd suggest anyone that is skeptical, have a look at the report and the (many) papers it ...
Cockroaches are a potential risk because they act as a vector for a number of diseases, bacteria, and other pathogens:
Cockroaches are arthropod transmitters of disease, acting both as mechanical vectors and as reservoirs of pathogenic agents. It has been shown that cockroaches harbor and transmit, both in nature and under experimental conditions, about ...
According to this site rats:
reach sexual maturity at 4 months (for females, who are the limiting factor here)
can give birth seven times a year
have litters of about 8
Starting with two sexually mature rats (and assuming averages of all the above throughout), the original pair will produce 7 litters of 8 rats in a year - 56 rats. The first litter in the ...
The radiation is 1000 times stronger
According to Wikipedia The transmission power of a GSM handset is limited to a maximum of 2 watts in GSM 850/900 and 1 watt in GSM 1800/1900.
According to a Radio-Electronics.com article "GSM Power Control and Power Class" the base station controls handset power output in the range 2-19 which is 39 dBm to 5 dBm.
The symptoms you describe are commonly referred to as electromagnetic hypersensitivity.
I believe the studies you would be interested in are the following:
The majority of provocation trials to date have found that
self-described sufferers of electromagnetic hypersensitivity are
unable to distinguish between exposure to real and fake
What makes water hard is calcium carbonate (limescale).
Not only it is not unhealthy, but it is also prescribed as an antacid.
The myth that hard water favours kidney stones has been disproved by a study, which has actually found that the opposite is true: a calcium-carbonate-poor diet increases the risk of kidney stones:
A slightly lower dietary ...
Yes, it does, approximately 3 times that amount by weight, but that's not the whole story. You should consider other factors too in determining whether this means it is more harmful:
Firstly, when people smoke cannabis leaves or buds, they smoke them in a rolled cigarette which is usually larger than a tobacco cigarette. This would suggest that not only ...
Yes. Sunscreen reduces the incidence of skin melanomas. And skin melanomas kill.
Taking those two claims separately:
Does sun-screen reduce melanomas?
ABC News reported in December 2010 on some randomly-controlled research, with 1600 people participating, and published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
"It provides the first scientific data that ...
The excellent Skeptoid blog has an entry for this very question. It's an entertaining read and well sums up the typical reasoning behind the myth and debunks them. From his conclusion paragraph:
However, there's at least one remaining possibility that can explain what's being reported, and it doesn't require any new discoveries about anatomy or fans, or ...
Maybe. There is a lack of significant research into the health benefits standing desks. Most research has been focused on reducing sitting time.
First, it should be understood that the standing desk is not a new invention having been around since the 1800s. Furthermore, in the late 1890s there was a fairly significant push for the use of standing desks, or ...
His data are approximately correct. He gives all the sources and assumptions at the bottom of the article as well as a spread sheet with all the data.
Compare his data to Preliminary state data shows drop in rate of elevated lead levels in Flint
In the third quarter of 2010, 8.3 percent of Flint children 6 and younger showed elevated blood lead levels. ...
Clever marketing gimmick if you live in northern climes (where I have seen this marketed), but of value in hotter climates. Basically cloth will stop/absorb UV radiation based on the weave density. No one wearing a flannel shirt will ever get burned. However, it is not practical to wear such thick clothing in the summer or hot climates. So if UV ...
As for claim, that "98% of Europe banned water fluoridation". Without going much into detail:
population of European Union is 503 million;
according to claim's source, following EU countries have at least one active fluoridation program:
UK (62mln, 11% using fluoridated water)
Spain (47mln, 11% using fluoridated water)
Poland (39mln, 1% using fluoridated ...
This claim is most likely related to the presence of certain controversial chemicals present in some kinds of plastic. The most discussed is certainly Bisphenol A (BPA).
The claim about microvaving in plastic bottles is probably related to the fact that BPA leeches faster out of plastic with hot water than with cold water. One study found that
ONE HOUR ANYWHERE NEAR IT AND YOU'RE DEAD
This claim is probably too broad and the information is outdated, but the general idea is correct. A quick search revealed a few relevant details:
From Atlas Obscura:
According to the Natural Resources Defense Council, the lake is so polluted that its waters will kill a human within an hour.
From Basement ...
Here is a good article that seems much more unbiased. It looks like there is no real scientific link.
Is there evidence supporting a link between autism and GMOs
However, whether you are searching for a link between autism and GMOs or autism and glyphosate, your findings can be summarized in one brief sentence: “there is no data that I could find”.
Regarding the claim that scratching is a "No Risk" activity, here is a study showing no HIV transmission from scratches and bites from a person with contaminated fingers and mouth:
To examine the relative risk of transmission of the human
immuno-deficiency virus (HIV) through bites and scratches, we studied
198 health care workers, 30 of whom were ...
When it comes to childhood cancers, the answer is No, nuclear power plants are not related..
The Swiss did a major study looking for the risks of childhood cancers and leukaemia amongst children who lived near nuclear power plants.
Childhood cancer and nuclear power plants in Switzerland: a census-based cohort study
Ben D Spycher, Martin Feller, Marcel ...
No. No amount of masturbation ("excessive" or otherwise) causes acne.
Self-help forum and product retailer, Acne.org explain on their Acne Myth page:
This antiquated notion, originating as early as the 17th century to dissuade young people from having premarital sex, is not based on scientific evidence.
Masturbation and Acne
Is there a correlation ...
The whole idea that prone masturbation is harmful started in 1998 when Dr. Lawrence I. Sank proposed a theory of sexual dysfunction called Traumatic Masturbatory Syndrome (TMS) (1) .
In his journal article, Dr. Sank speculated that the habit of masturbating prone (while lying face down — tending to rub penis against your hand, the surface of the floor, bed,...
I did find one study about WiFi and trees. Conclusion translated to English from Dutch:
Wageningen University was commissioned by the municipality of Alphen aan den Rijn how the increasing number of sources of electromagnetic radiation, such as masts, could play a role in the deteriorating health of the trees. It was a growing cell the effect of radiation ...
There is an important point about the concentration of fluoride that Mercola doesn't address. The concentration of fluoride intentionally added to water in the US is according to the EPA between 0.7 - 1.2mg/L:
Optimally fluoridated community water systems add fluoride to a level
between 0.7 – 1.2mg/L. Fluoride is sometimes naturally present in
It doesn't seem that any cancer victims have yet been identified. The probabilities are low and are assessed over the whole lifetime of people in the worst affected areas.
It won't be possible to identify specific people whose cancer is attributable to the Fukushima Daiichi accident. At best, large scale studies may be able to measure the small increase in ...
Do desktop computers catch fire often?
In 2007-2011, there were an estimated 730 reported U.S. home structure fires involving office equipment per year...
[of these] Computers [accounted for] 48%
In 2007-2011, there were an estimated 630 reported U.S. non-confined non-home ...
It is justified with (recent) evidence.
Selectively quoting from WP:Pariculates#Health_problems, emphasis of publication dates mine:
Inhalation of PM2.5 – PM10 is associated with elevated risk of
adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as low birth weight.
Sapkota, Amir; Chelikowsky, Adam P.; Nachman, Keeve E.; Cohen, Aaron J.; Ritz, Beate (2012-12-01). "...