3 of 6
turned gene to genes
  • 28383
  • 13
  • 119
  • 136

Do the mother's genes almost exclusively determine the sons' intelligence?

According to this paper: Intelligence and the X chromosome[1] by Gillian Turner, published by The Lancet (a highly regarded medical journal) in 1996, the X chromosome is dominantly responsible for coding "intelligence" and "intellectual function". Since a son inherits the X chromosome only from his mother, supposedly his intelligence is dominated by his mother's genes. At the closing paragraph the paper boldly claims (I added the bold and italic for emphasis):

In day-to-day practical evolutionary terms for our new millennium the male needs to remember that his primitive urges in mate selection are coded in his genome, and that they target current ideals of sexual attractiveness and youth. His frontal cortex should interpose reminding him that his sons’ intelligence, if that is important to him, is solely dependent on his partner, and that is mirrored in both her parents.

I am naturally skeptical of such sweeping claims. Has there been a follow up research to confirm, reject, or qualify this claim? (it's been almost 2 decades since the original paper) Is this conclusion commonly accepted by biologists?

Note: This question was asked before: Is 80% of childs intelligance acquired from mother? but was closed due to wording and lack of sources.

[1] Turner, G. (1996). Intelligence and the X chromosome. The Lancet, 347(9018), 1814-1815. [pdf]

  • 2499
  • 14
  • 23