It has been stated that drinking a glass of red wine per day is good for the heart. There has been a lot of discussion surrounding this issue; two examples are this article from the Guardian and this CNN article.

I am wondering whether there is a marketing campaign behind the claims about red wine, as has been stated about açaí.

Where does the received wisdom about a glass of red wine at night come from? What about the veracity of these statements about red wine? What are some definitive facts (with references) for this debate?

  • Very related (possibly a dupe): skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/1059/…
    – Sam I Am
    Jun 13, 2012 at 3:51
  • @SamIAm: Thanks. The question is a subtly different one, though one of its answers has bearing on this question. The reason why I will argue that this question is different is the implication that it's wine (and wine more than any other common alcoholic beverage and also not grape juice) that one is encouraged to drink regularly in moderate amounts, for its supposed health benefits. Like for all urban myths, a statement can and should be considered misleading if obvious implications are left out (by omission of facts or details). Jun 13, 2012 at 5:59
  • Please provide an example of the claim... Also, please keep the question neutral! :-)
    – Sklivvz
    Jun 13, 2012 at 6:25
  • @Sklivvz: Thanks. I hope my edit is an improvement. Jun 13, 2012 at 9:07
  • 1
    @user14996 I agree that the question I linked to is very similar but still a different question. I linked it for you to see if the answers there satisfactorily answered your question. :)
    – Sam I Am
    Jun 13, 2012 at 20:39

2 Answers 2


The debate over if red wine had benefits for the heart or other areas of the body focuses around the current debate over the supposed health benefits of the natural phenol Resveratrol.

From the Linus Pauling Institute OSU:

Although resveratrol can inhibit the growth of cancer cells in culture and in some animal models, it is not known whether high intakes of resveratrol can prevent cancer in humans.

Moderate alcohol consumption has been consistently associated with 20-30% reductions in coronary heart disease risk, but it is not yet clear whether red wine polyphenols, such as resveratrol, confer any additional risk reduction.

Notice that they used the word associated in the above quote meaning that there could be any number of other factors that are not measured in scientific study that could influence this correlation (Eg. moderate alcohol consumption may lower stress and lower stress improves heart health?)

Socioeconomic and lifestyle differences between people who prefer wine and those who prefer beer or liquor may explain part of the additional benefit observed in some studies. Several studies have found that people who prefer wine tend to have higher incomes, more education, smoke less, and eat more fruits and vegetables and less saturated fat than people who prefer other alcoholic beverages

Considering the mass media hype surrounding the potential health benefits of red wine, and various press releases by pharmeceutical companies surrounding the supposed benefits, this study has never been published in a peer reviewed scientific journal, so claims made here cannot be taken seriously.

In all, there may be some truth to this, as high dosages of resveratrol had positive effects in lab mice, but so far nobody can really say for sure.

  • Thank you. I do think that the conclusion for now is to not yet admit red wine benefits into the repertoire of confirmed knowledge to base one's life on. My reasoning goes like this: The relevant claims are plausible but have not been demonstrated in a scientifically conclusive way. Like any "possible" but vague statements, the benefits offered by believing in them are too unclear (is it overall better for one's health to drink more wine or not?) and do not necessarily outweigh the burdens imposed on one's life (money spent for wine instead of gym membership, regular monitoring and worries). Jun 13, 2012 at 18:02
  • 1
    @user14996: Wine is said to have other health benefits as well, not necessarily related specifically to heart health. It's said by some to help digestion, provide probiotics, etc. Some of these other claims may (or may not) have a more solid scientific backing.
    – Flimzy
    Jun 14, 2012 at 21:17
  • 1
    @Flimzy provide probiotics Increasingly the wine that is bought in stores or large wineries today has been effectively sanitized of active yeasts and bacteria so that claim is probably worthy of its own question. Most beer and wine today unless it is homemade, has been treated with UV radiation that neuters and kills the active yeast strains to stop fermentation immediately. This is done to control sugar content and prevent high pressure buildup by bottling sweeter wines earlier. Is this practice really that widespread or is their something else other than active yeast that promotes this? Jun 15, 2012 at 11:12
  • @maple_shaft: That's a fair point. Whether wine has other "probiotic" properties, I don't know. I'm not really prepared to defend the view that wine is good for one's health at all--I just wanted to make the point that the claims for wine's health benefits don't end at "heart health."
    – Flimzy
    Jun 15, 2012 at 15:24
  • 1
    Rather than taking in alcohol on a daily bases it might be better to just eat red grapes or buy resveratrol supplements.
    – Nope
    Jan 7, 2014 at 16:37

Well, there seems to be some benefit of a low to moderate consumption of red wine to prevent cardiovascular disease. There has been a lot of different studies on this, with different methodologies and results, when that happens, a meta-analyses is warranted, and this question is so polemic that it has a few meta-analyses already. This study, from Chiva-Blanc et al (2013), attempts to make a summary of those meta-analyses of human studies:1

The beneficial effects of red wine on the cardiovascular system are summarized in Fig. 1, and seem to be greater than other alcoholic beverages, probably because of its high phenolic content. A meta-analysis analyzing 23 studies of the cardiovascular effects of wine and 22 studies of the cardiovascular effects of beer (Di Castelnuovo et al., 2002) observed an inverse association between moderate wine consumption and vascular risk. This meta-analysis indicated an average significant reduction of 32% of overall vascular risk associated with wine drinking. Wine drinkers show a reduced cardiovascular mortality and a lower incidence of non-fatal vascular end points. Beer drinking was also associated with a reduced risk of vascular events, although to a lesser extent than that observed with wine.

There are many possible explanations for this. The authors show supporting studies that wine and other forms of alcohol increase good cholesterol, decrease oxidative stress and inflamation, reduce platelet aggregation and other pathophysiological mechanisms to heart disease, and red wine shows a greater effect than alcohol in other forms (beer, spirits). This is well demonstrated on a table in their article, but I believe I can't reproduce it because those are usually copyrighted. Anyway, this is possibly because both ethanol and poliphenols (which are present in wine, but not in spirits) exert those effects, so yes, red wine seems to be the most beneficial.

But, it is important that they also state that:

Although daily low to moderate alcohol intake is inversely related to CVD, the hormetic behavior of alcohol consumption shows an increased risk of certain cancers, cirrhosis and death from accidents with increasing alcohol consumption (Di Castelnuovo et al., 2010). Three or more drinks per day may increase the risk of heart disease, hypertension, stroke, obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, breast cancer, neurodegeneration, depressive disorders, weakening of bones, suicide and injuries.

In response to that article, Testino et al (2013) wrote a letter to the editor explaining that, although cardiovascular risk may decrease, cancer risk rises even with low consumption, and is generally not advisable:2

For all these reasons, in Australia, the National Heart Foundation explicitly advises against the consumption of red wine and other type of alcoholic drinks for the preventing or treatment of heart disease and WHO suggests that a greater reduction in death from ischaemic heart disease can be more effectively obtained by being physically active and eating a healthier diet than by drinking a low dose of alcohol.

Personally, as a psychiatrist, I would be concerned to make such recommendation because of the addictive properties of alcohol, and the general lack of understanding of people that is not a logical conclusion that, if 1 glass is good for your health, 10 glasses are 10 times as good…

List of references:

  1. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23408240
  2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23831770
  • So it's any of drink that contains alcohol, not just red wine
    – Alex
    Jan 5, 2014 at 2:23
  • 1
    It seems that any ethanol drink could have this effect, but red wine seems to have a greater effect, probably due to polyphenols. Since polyphenols are present in other drinks, like grape juice, maybe those too can prove beneficial, even without ethanol. There are some studies on this already, but not as many as for red wine.
    – tpianca
    Jan 5, 2014 at 10:32
  • Were any of the studies interventional? Or were they all epidemiological?
    – user5582
    Jan 6, 2014 at 20:07
  • For the article I cited, they are all human trials, although a few have a in vitro part.
    – tpianca
    Jan 7, 2014 at 0:48

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .