Many people I know consider bespectacled individuals to be smarter than the average normal sighted person.
Is there any scientific basis to this belief?
Skeptics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scientific skepticism. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityMany people I know consider bespectacled individuals to be smarter than the average normal sighted person.
Is there any scientific basis to this belief?
There is a correlation between IQ and myopia (near-sightedness). I believe Arthur Jensen was the first to explore the link. Here is a newer open-source article on the topic, though there are many more. The correlation also holds within families, and is apparently not related to reading books:
After controlling for age, gender, school, parental myopia, father’s education, and books read per week, myopia (spherical equivalent [SE]) of at least −0.5 D was associated with high nonverbal IQ (highest quartile) versus low IQ (lowest quartile) (odds ratio = 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.7–3.4). Controlling for the same factors, children with higher nonverbal IQ scores had significantly more myopic refractions (−1.86 D for children with nonverbal IQ in the highest quartile compared with −1.24 D for children with nonverbal IQ in the lowest quartile; P = 0.002) and longer axial lengths (24.06 mm versus 23.80 mm; P = 0.022). Nonverbal IQ accounted for a greater proportion of the variance in refraction compared with books read per week.
If you want to read up on this further, a lot of hits will come up if you make a search for intelligence, myopia and pleiotropy.