Einstein's brain has been the subject of much debate and speculation, because of his notable and exceptional contributions to our understanding of the universe.

The claim exists that his brain may have been unusual in some way, which could correlate with his genius. For example, quoting from Wikipedia:

The brain has attracted attention because of Einstein's reputation for being one of the foremost geniuses of the 20th century, and apparent regularities or irregularities in the brain have been used to support various ideas about correlations in neuroanatomy with general or mathematical intelligence.

I am curious as to whether this is due to a physiological phenomenon, or if it must be explained by something else.

Was the brain of Albert Einstein physiologically different than that of most other humans?

  • I recall a documentary that showed that he had much more glial cells compared to the average brain Jan 26, 2012 at 1:36
  • 1
    @ratchetfreak that study was criticized due to being compared to only 11 other cases, and those cases being much younger than Einstein. That is significant as glial cells continue to divide as the body ages. Jan 26, 2012 at 2:25
  • 4
    While this is an excellent question (and answer, below) it’s worth keeping in mind that physiology directly and exclusively determines brain function. It’s as simple as that: if Einstein’s brain functioned differently then it was physiologically different. This is a trivial fact but it’s sometimes hard to grasp for the lay public (hence the whole discussion about “free will” which makes no sense if you know that the brain’s structure encodes its function). (The next question is obviously: different in what regard?) Jan 26, 2012 at 17:25
  • @KonradRudolph: Just curious, but does physiology include the quantum and/or electrical state? (Does quantum state play any biological role?) In other words, could someone have Einstein's brain but a different electrical pattern and as a result be someone else? Feb 17, 2012 at 21:17
  • 1
    @BrianM.Hunt The electrical patterns would affect, and be affected by, the physiological structure. “quantum” is a red herring. While quantum effects do play a biological role (since enzymes (probably?) use them to perform their function), they don’t have a higher order function. We know how the signal in the brain is encoded, and it’s not encoded in a quantum state (though even smart people like Roger Penrose believe otherwise). There is nothing in biology to suspect otherwise (for one thing, this would require an entirely redundant, undiscovered signalling mechanism). Feb 20, 2012 at 9:29

1 Answer 1


From Eric H. Chudler (University of Washington):

There are 3 published scientific studies that have examined Einstein's brain.

1) On the brain of a scientist: Albert Einstein (1985)

The scientists counted the number of neurons (nerve cells) and glial cells in four areas of Einstein's brain: area 9 of the cerebral cortex on the right and left hemisphere and area 39 of the cerebral cortex on the right and left hemisphere.

... The ratios of neurons to glial cells in Einstein's brain were compared to those from the brains of 11 men who died at the average age of 64.

... there were more glial cells for every neuron in Einstein's brain.


  • The "normal" brains that were compared to Einstein's may not have been the best group for comparison.

    The average age of these brains was 12 years younger than Einstein's brain. In fact, the youngest brain in this group was only 47 years old. It is possible that the neuron to glial ratio seen in Einstein's brain was quite normal for his age and that the younger comparison group just did not show these changes yet.
    Also, the paper did not describe the background of the comparison group. What was their intelligence and cause of death? Would these factors have anything to do with the observed brain differences?

  • The "experimental group" had only one subject...Einstein!
    Additional studies are needed to see if these anatomical differences are found in other people with conceptual and mathematical skills like Einstein.

  • It appears that only a very small portion of the four areas of each brain was studied.

    The paper states that "Four to six sections were cut from each block, Einstein's and the controls." However, after staining, only ONE section from each block was studied! There is no indication that this single thin section was obtained from similar regions of area 39 and area 9 from the different brains. It is even unclear how much of each section was counted. Moreover, only the ratio of neurons to glial cells was published. The total number of cells that were counted is not given in the paper. This is important to get an idea of how the experimenters came to their conclusions.

It is important to remember that the areas 9 and 39 make important connections with many other areas of the brain. To assign a particular behavior or personality to a single brain area is too simple. Parts of the brain do not act by themselves. Rather, complex behavior is the result of many areas acting together.

2) Alterations in cortical thickness and neuronal density in the frontal cortex of Albert Einstein. (1996)

Einstein's brain weighed only 1,230 grams, which is less than the average adult male brain (about 1,400 grams).

The authors also reported that the thickness of Einstein's cerebral cortex (area 9) was thinner than that of five control brains. However, the DENSITY of neurons in Einstein's brain was greater.

In other words, Einstein was able to pack more neurons in a given area of cortex.

3) The exceptional brain of Albert Einstein (1999)

In this paper, the external surface characteristics of Einstein's brain were compared to those from the brains of 35 men (average age, 57 years old).

Unlike the brain of these 35 men, Einstein's brain had an unusual pattern of grooves (called sulci) on both right and left parietal lobes. This particular area of the parietal lobe is thought to be important for mathematical abilities and spatial reasoning. Einstein's brain had a much shorter lateral sulcus (**Sylvian fissure) that was partially missing**.

His brain was also 15% wider than the other brains.

The researchers think that these unique brain characteristics may have allowed better connections between neurons important for math and spatial reasoning.

Although these results are interesting, it must be remembered that this study had only ONE brain in the experimental group...Albert Einstein's brain.

It remains to be seen if other mathematical geniuses also show these distinguishing brain characteristics. Moreover, the study did not investigate the brain at a microscopic level. In other words, the study says nothing about how neurons in these brains were connected and of course, could not tell if there were differences in the way the neurons functioned.


  • TL;DR executive summary would be much appreciated
    – user5341
    Jan 27, 2012 at 21:45

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .