The standard treatment for burns seems to be to put the burn in cool water for 10 to 20 minutes.

It seems sensible to me that some burns can gain a benefit from this action when the skin/flesh is still extremely hot and is essentially still cooking from the residual heat. For example, if a hand was dipped in a deep fryer, putting it immediately into cool water would be a great idea as it will immediately start to cool the the flesh. The burnt flesh for such a case may initially as high as 180 degrees C and clearly needs to be cooled as soon as possible to prevent deeper flesh getting burned.

I'd guess that the temperature at which cells in your body are damaged is probably in the range of 45 to 55 degrees. Once the temperature of flesh drops below that point (whatever it may be), perhaps there is no further benefit in cooling the burn, except perhaps for comfort.

A less severe burn caused by hot water (lets say 75 degrees C) would cool much more quickly by itself (in dry air anyway) thanks to the evaporation of the water (unlike a burn caused by hot oil), and if submerged in cool water would cool to an acceptable temperature within just a few seconds. Is there really any benefit to leaving it in cool water for 10 minutes or more?

If my understanding is correct, there is also a reduction in pain when a burn is not exposed to air. Presumably this is the reason why wrapping with plastic cling wrap (after applying cool water) is recommended by some for reducing the pain from a burn. I think this effect would also intuitively cause people to think that submerging the burn is giving benefit, when perhaps it isn't.

  • 1
    I think the pain reduction is due to cold closing TRP channels (the pain "sensors") in pain sensitive nerve fibers.
    – nico
    Jan 23, 2012 at 22:18
  • 3
    The heat caused by a bad burn isn't just in that surface layer - you may need to bring down the temperature of a good chunk of flesh and cool the surrounding tissue, reducing swelling.
    – Rory Alsop
    Jan 23, 2012 at 23:27
  • 1
    Agreed... but even with a bad burn I'd be suprised if it took more than 2 mins in cool water to cool down a burn that's even a few mm deep. Obviously they can be deeper than that sometimes, but I'd expect that to be a small minority of cases. Jan 23, 2012 at 23:30
  • This is obviously anecdotal, but I have noticed that keeping the burned part in cold water does reduce the amount of pain experienced for as long as the part remains wet, whether or not it actually helps the burn heal faster or not.
    – user2432
    Jan 24, 2012 at 1:07
  • @user2432: Yes, that seems to be the same benefit gained by putting plastic cling wrap on a burn. Exposure to air is avoided in both cases, so that might be what's necessary for pain reduction. Jan 24, 2012 at 2:03

1 Answer 1


The recommendations in this area vary, and the science they are based upon seems to be not entire resolved, but there's enough evidence to give practical recommendations.

The Australasian Cochrane Centre published an Evidence Summary for the Early Cooling of Burns where they looked at a number of studies in 2009, including a systematic review that looked at 42 more.

They concluded (emphasis mine):

Immediate cooling of burns is effective and safe at reducing the severity of tissue damage and relieving pain. Optimal duration and temperature of cooling is unclear, although animal studies have suggested that burns should be cooled immediately in running tap water for at least 20 minutes.

Meanwhile in 2010, another study looked at the existing research:

They discuss the evidence:

Previously there has been a lot of conflicting information in the literature regarding the optimal duration and delay of first aid treatment. As first aid treatment is often applied only to relieve pain, the preferred duration of the treatment may be until no pain is felt on removal of the cold – which can be for up to several days! However, researchers have recommended durations of 30 minutes, 2 hours, or 30 minutes – 3 hours. Recently, Bartlett et al found that tap water treatment of porcine burns for 20 minutes showed statistically less histological damage 9 days post-burn compared to 5, 10 and 30 minutes duration. This is in agreement with our own studies which showed that wound re-epithelialisation was faster (p=0.05) after 20 minutes of first aid treatment compared to untreated controls. Interestingly, for both studies, longer durations of first aid treatment (30 minutes or 1 hour) did not provide any further benefit, perhaps indicating that first aid should only be applied for 20 minutes and if pain persists after this time, other analgesics such as paracetamol should be administered

Finally, they conclude with an updated set of recommendations for the public, which include:

Treatment: Cold running water
Temperature: Tap water (2-15°C)
Duration: 20 minutes is best, 10 minutes - 1 hour is acceptable
Delay: Immediate is best, 1-3 hours is acceptable

(This is a summary, there is also important advice provided about when to seek emergency treatment.)

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .