It [a letter] argues that a prominent theory describing what makes someone or something conscious — called the integrated information theory (IIT) — should be labelled as pseudoscience.
in addition, Lau says, some of his co-authors think that it’s not possible to empirically test IIT’s core assumptions, which they argue contributes to the theory’s status as pseudoscience.
The article continues with rebuttal
[Liad Mudrik], “Not only did we test it, we managed to falsify one of its predictions,”
- Is IIT a pseudo science?