According to Forbes:

In Aneyoshi, a small village on Japan’s northeastern coast, all the inhabitants survived the tsunami of 2011 by climbing to higher ground, following the warnings of a stone marker. The tsunami stone was erected here after a tsunami destroyed the village in 1933, leaving only four survivors behind.

The questions are:

  1. Did all inhabitants of Aneyoshi survive the tsunami?
  2. Did they climb to higher ground because of the warnings on the stone marker?
  3. Were tsunami survival rates different in nearby villages that didn't have a similar stone marker?

1 Answer 1


It's kind of right.

According to other sources the Aneyoshi monument is not a common "tsunami hazard" sign. Instead, it prohibits building homes below the marked point, and, apparently, after the stone was erected (after another, earlier tsunami; different sources mention different years), survivors moved the location of the village to a higher ground, and "the village credits that with saving the village from another tsunami in 1960". Looking it up on Google Maps, the village indeed is situated higher than the monument.

And the village did survive the 2011 tsunami relatively intact. Not all inhabitants survived, though:

The mother, Mihoko Aneishi, 36, had rushed to take her children out of school right after the earthquake. Then she made the fatal mistake of driving back through low-lying areas just as the tsunami hit.

A significant hit to the village's population of 34.

So as to your questions:

  1. not everyone survived, but the village itself was untouched - "while Aneyoshi Bay had the highest runup (38.9 m) in the 2011 tsunami, the stone was about 10 m above the inundation zone, and no houses in Aneyoshi Village were flooded";
  2. technically yes, but it happended decades before 2011.
  3. apparently, the Aneyoshi marker is unique in that it prohibits building below it; usually, such markers simply denote safe zones for evacuation. That said, there were ~4000 fatalities in the Iwate prefecture during the tsunami, and this particular village was untouched - the only fatalities among the residents happened when they were outside it.

An important distinction would be that modern inhabitants of the village were kept aware of the warnings recorded on the marker. This study mentions another village in the affected area, Murohama, which was located in the tsunami strike zone. The tsunami warning tower there was destroyed in the earthquake, but the villagers still evacuated to a higher ground, and not to the closest hill, which houses another stone with an inscription recounting how villagers hiding on this hill were caught in a tsunami because the hill was too low. The study notes that these were the only locales where the stone warnings entered the folklore and were commonly known, and compares them to other cases where similar markers were forgotten:

For instance, after the earthquake people in Kesennuma, a village close to Aneyoshi, returned to their houses in the low-lying areas, although messages on stone markers warned: “If earthquake comes, beware of tsunami” and “choose life over your possessions and valuables” (Macan-Markar, 2013).

This article offers an interesting hypothesis: the markers in Aneyoshi and Murohama are specific, offering practical advice such as "don't build here, build higher" and "don't go to this hill to hide from tsunami, find a higher place". They are also linked in public consciousness to specific incidents from which these warnings were borne. Most of the stones have more abstract warnings, such as "beware of tsunami", which are easily forgotten. Disaster-prevention training focused more on modern warning systems, which in many areas were rendered inoperable, and the infrastructure was designed for more common tsunamis, with breakwalls that were too low and evacuation centers in several cases located in the zones hit by the one-in-a-thousand-years tsunami. The article mentions Yanosuke Hirai, a Japanese engineer known for his insistence on the importance of taking highly precautionary protective measures against earthquakes and tsunamis. He is said to have often made reference to the great Jogan tsunami of 869, which reportedly travelled 7 kilometers inland from the coast and even reached the Sengan Shinto shrine in Iwanuma, his birth town. Hirai took part in the design of Onagawa Nuclear Power Plant and is recorded as being the only member of the project team who had insisted on making the plant's tsunami breakwall 14.8 meters tall; others considered 12 meters to be sufficient. Onagawa NPP was twice as close to the epicenter of the 2011 earthquake as the infamous Fukushima Plant, but managed to survive both the earthquake and the following tsunami without any significant damage.


  1. "Preservation of Records, Knowledge and Memory across Generations (RK&M). Markers - Reflections on Intergenerational Warnings in the Form of Japanese Tsunami Stones" - OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, 2014 (pdf)
  2. "Learning from Earthquakes. The Japan Tohoku Tsunami of March 11, 2011" - EERI Special Earthquake Report — November 2011 (pdf)
  3. Nakahara S., Ichikawa M, "Mortality in the 2011 Tsunami in Japan" - Journal of Epidemiology, 2013; 23(1): pp70–73 (link)
  4. Fackler M., “Tsunami Warnings, Written in Stone.” - The New York Times, 21 Apr. 2011 (link)
  5. “The mystic stone at tsunami tide's highest point that saved tiny Japanese village from the deadly wave” - Daily Mail Online, 21 Apr. 2011 (link)
  6. “We’re designed to make bad choices but here’s what we can do” - The Economist, 6 Dec. 2019 (link)
  • 30
    Also worth noting that they didn't actually "climb to higher ground". This implies that they saw the tsunami coming in the moment and fled for the hills, when in fact, they'd spent years or decades resettling on higher ground. The way it's worded it looks like it happened a lot faster than it probably did. Commented Feb 27, 2023 at 14:09
  • 4
    @DarrelHoffman I recall hearing about an island where there was a local saying that you should run for higher ground when the tide goes out unexpectedly. The story claimed that (at least some) people who heeded this warning survived but on other similar islands people started collecting fish instead. There's probably a lot of these stories and it would be easy to mix them up.
    – JimmyJames
    Commented Feb 27, 2023 at 16:35
  • 3
    Such advice to head for higher ground when there's a quake (and not wait for it to finish) are common in areas of Alaska, IIRC. They were mostly put up after the megaquake of 1964. The geology there is such that you can get flash tsunamis in fjords rather quickly. Commented Feb 27, 2023 at 17:27
  • 3
    @DanilaSmirnov many thanks, and please note that I'm not attempting to criticise your excellent answer. So it was an... admonition? rather than a statute. Commented Feb 27, 2023 at 20:59
  • 4
    While a stone marker may kind of make sense in 1933, I think it's somewhat irrelevant where you have modern legally-enforced zoning laws and tsunami inundation maps. One should compare this to a community where such measures were taken.
    – user71659
    Commented Feb 28, 2023 at 0:03

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .