The DW article Ukraine is using Elon Musk's Starlink for drone strikes about the use of Starlink to provide internet in Ukraine is suggesting that it is playing a role in, e.g., the way president Zelenskyi is able to make live calls to so many nation's governments, parliaments or the UN among other things. It has also become a target for the Russian military. Would Ukraine be able to communicate globally without the use of Starlink? And I am not even mentioning its supposed role in drone strikes.
10
-
6This question is a bit wishy-washy. When does a tool's role become "significant"? Can we focus on one of the less opinion-based claims? (e.g. Is it one of the most popular app downloads? Is Russia using jammers? Does Zelensky use it for speeches? etc.)– Oddthinking ♦Apr 15 at 0:18
-
4Surely the question title should say "in Ukranian defense" not "in Russian invasion"? The title suggests it is helping the Russians.– Weather VaneApr 15 at 8:31
-
What of it? Why is it notable? You might as well ask if any available technology can be exploited, for example "Does GPS (intended for civilian use) play a role?" There seems to be an argument fallacy at work here.– Weather VaneApr 15 at 11:09
-
@WeatherVane You are right, it is definitely meant "in Ukrainian defence", but it is what it is - a Russian invasion, which reportedly does not go as planned.– toddddosApr 15 at 11:19
-
1Way too early to tell. Once the war is over civilians may get the data and assess the effect. Currently most is tainted by war propaganda.– pinegulfApr 16 at 19:02
|
Show 5 more comments