My father and I couldn't be more different when it comes to sleep. I rarely go to bed before midnight, while he will often retire around 9:30. While growing up, we'd often get into discussions on the topic of our sleep habits. Over and over I heard him make an assertion that he heard once years ago:

"You sleep better in the hours before midnight....". In his mind, even if I sleep from 12-8am, I'm still worse off than if I went to bed at 9:30pm and slept for the same amount of time. Is there any evidence one way or the other on this subject?

Measures of what might qualify as "better" sleep could include:

  • Perceived refreshedness upon waking (does one feel ready to "jump out of bed"?
  • Rate of diminishing alertness/mood as the day proceeds
  • Objective measurements such as REM/deep sleep or tossing and turning per sleep session
  • Some other suggested method of comparing sleep quality

In other words, any way to compare some measured/perceived "quality" of sleep based on the time of day of the sleep session (much prior to midnight or at/after midnight) while keeping duration relatively constant could answer this question.

  • Interesting question, but who would you distinguish between "better sleep at night" from "better to be active during the day"?
    – vartec
    Jul 15, 2011 at 15:13
  • 1
    Great question! My wife always says the same thing -- that the sleep you get before midnight is somehow of better "quality" than those after midnight.
    – Hendy
    Jul 15, 2011 at 15:44
  • @Timothy: I added some suggestions for how to compare sleep quality between the two groups; hopefully you approve of the edit. Let me know if you have anything to add.
    – Hendy
    Jul 15, 2011 at 15:55
  • 2
    @Ahmed Haidar: People differ wildly in their preferred sleep patterns. Find what works for you, and don't assume it will work for anybody else. Jul 21, 2011 at 2:05
  • 1
    I've even heard this supposed advantage quantified as "An hour before midnight is worth two after it." Jul 28, 2016 at 10:43

2 Answers 2


It might depend on how you define the quality, but if alertness suffices, then No, it does not seem to be any better to get more sleep before midnight if duration is relatively constant.

See THIS Discover Magazine blog post, which summarizes THIS Science Magazine study. Here are the pertinent bits:

In a sleep lab, the researchers studied people with extreme bedtimes, or chronotypes, both early and late. The larks in the study typically woke up between 4 a.m. and 5:30 a.m. and went to bed by 9 p.m. The night owls, or evening chronotypes, left to their own devices would go to bed at 3 a.m. or 4 a.m. and rise at noon.

In other words, both groups sleep between 7-9 hours per night, but the time of day is significantly different.

All the test subjects...took tests measuring their alertness 1.5 hours after waking, and again 10.5 hours after waking. In the earlier test researchers saw no difference between the two groups’ performances, but in the later test the night owls performed better than the early birds, and also topped their own prior test results.

FMRI brain scans told the rest of the tale. In the night owls, increased activity was seen in two parts of the brain at 10.5 hours — the suprachiasmatic nucleus area and the locus coeruleus — that are involved in regulating the circadian signal. Essentially, the circadian signal was winning out over the pressure to sleep. In the early birds, on the other hand, “the sleep pressure prevents the expression of the circadian signal,” so those individuals were less able to keep their attention focused.

So, it seems that despite not getting to bed before midnight at all, the study shows the night owls fared just as well or better as early birds on measures of alertness.

The post concludes with the caveat that outside the lab, some who are prone to night-owl activities might not have the luxury of a noon wake up time, and thus do worse if they heed the desire to stay up late while also being required to get up early.

I looked around for more, but this was the best I found that seemed like it could try to answer the question based on some metric (alertness throughout the day) to look at simply the time of day of sleep while keeping duration constant. If there were more, I'd be quite interested in:

  • perceived refreshedness after a sleep session
  • if this claim stems from the fact that many who go to bed late might need to get up early and thus be in a bit of sleep deprivation vs. how the study above proceeded with those who maintained a consistent schedule but simply had their sleep session shifted
  • This also seems to assume that both groups are equally capable of getting 7-9 hours of sleep. My guess is that having a sleep schedule more in line with daylight hours would result in less frequent occurances of insomnia.
    – Muhd
    Feb 16, 2012 at 4:16

You also need to consider the effect of age. Young people naturally have body clocks that tend to both sleep and rise late, whereas the very young (pre-teen) and the older have body clocks that sleep and rise earlier. There is a very interesting BBC documentary on the effect of the body clock and how it's biological that teenagers and young adults sleep in late. This easily explains the effect of the difference between you and your father.

The Secret Life of Your Bodyclock

Unfortunately, it is not available for viewing, although you can still find it if you're familiar with the Internet's darker corners.

  • 3
    It's not reasonable to expect readers to watch a 50 minute documentary (even if they can find it) in the hope of finding evidence that will support your claim. Please be more specific in your references, and quote the key claims and how they know it is correct. Primary references would be preferred.
    – Oddthinking
    Aug 30, 2014 at 10:04

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .