3

The claim:

The research is based on the analysis of blood samples from 959 people, collected during lung cancer screening tests...

Some 23 of the positive results date back to September 2019, suggesting that the virus was actually present in [Italy] as early as during last summer

https://www.rt.com/news/506796-coronavirus-italy-blood-september/

I believe this is the relevant part of the study:

Table 1 reports anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibody detection according to the time of sample collection in Italy. In the first 2 months, September–October 2019, 23/162 (14.2%) patients in September and 27/166 (16.3%) in October displayed IgG or IgM antibodies, or both.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0300891620974755

This is far earlier than the conventional timeline placing the origin in Wuhan in November 2019.


Was COVID-19 present in Italy in September 2019?

3
  • Other than being about a different quote, this is probably not all that different in thrust from skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/47583/… – Fizz Dec 14 '20 at 17:09
  • 2
    @Fizz, though this claim is for some months earlier. – Paul Draper Dec 14 '20 at 17:11
  • 1
    I wonder if this is claimed by the same people who claim the tests are unreliable because they show too many false positives. – user253751 Dec 16 '20 at 13:51
5

I don't have the immunology expertise to analyze this particular study (e.g. in re cross-reactivity), but I'll just note when it come to antibodies, results are harder to interpret than for PCR tests, e.g.

Two preliminary retrospective studies in the United Kingdom, sub-Sahara Africa, and the United States suggest that some people who were never infected with the virus that causes COVID-19 have cross-reactive antibodies against it—perhaps from previous exposure to similar human coronaviruses.

[...]

the researchers analyzed more than 300 blood samples collected from 2011 to 2018. While almost all samples had antibodies against coronaviruses that cause the common cold, 16 of 302 adults (5.3%) had antibodies that would recognize SARS-CoV-2—regardless of whether they had recently had a cold

In bit further detail, that study (in Science) found that some S2-specific antibodies that neutralize SARS-CoV-2 also neutralize the common-cold coronaviruses, which is basically their explanation for this cross-reactivity.

I'll note though that the Italian study used a sample of convenience:

individuals enrolled in a prospective lung cancer screening trial between September 2019 and March 2020

Who knows what they may have found if e.g. their sample extended back to 2018 or to 2011 as other studies on antibodies have done.

Also the Italian (Turmori) study only has one citation in another paper (also from Italy) insofar, so I can't find much in the way of expert commentary on it. (If you're curious, the paper citing it is on "Unexpected volume of Google Searches for COVID-19 symptoms in the prepandemic period in Lombardia, Italy")

Now on the angle obscure papers on this matter, there's one which concluded (on similar immunology arguments) that the virus had been circulating in Brazil since February 2019 (not a typo). I wasn't able to find 3rd party commentary on this study either.

Of some interest however, both the Brazil and Italy studies only looked at IgG and IgM, but another Dec 2020 study in Science found that an IgA spike is the best indicator of a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. In other words, beside possible cross-reactivity issues, both the Brazil and Italy studies seem to have poor time-specificity as to when a putative infection had happened, prior to the detection of the antibodies (they measured).

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .