This image is doing the rounds on Facebook:

See the text below

The image reads:

Yes, people die everyday. Yes we know it's not you because you are reading this.

Cancer takes approx. 1,600 Americans a day.
Heart events take approx. 1,800 Americans a day.
Suicides approx. 132.
Overdose deaths approx. 130.
Covid took 3,100 lives in America yesterday making this new internet visual outdated in the same week, and becoming the 3rd most deadliest day in American history.

Deadliest days in american history:

  1. Galveston Hurricane - 8,000
  2. Antietam - 3,600
  3. September 11, 2001 -2,977
  4. Last Thursday - 2,861
  5. Last Wednesday - 2,762
  6. Last Tuesday - 2,461
  7. Last Friday - 2,439
  8. Pearl Harbor - 2403

Wear a mask and avoid gatherings.

I want to know if the claims in it are correct. In particular was 'yesterday' really the 3rd deadliest day in American history?


4 Answers 4


The numbers on the chart seem to be close for the most part, although there are other events that match the criteria of this image that should be included.

We are going to assume, for the sake of this question, that the criteria that the creator of this image used was

  • Either deaths of American Citizens, or deaths on American soil – this is to prevent things like the Boxing Day Tsunami, the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombings, U.S. Strategic bombing raids during WW2, etc from being included on the list (and yes, Americans died in all of these events).
  • Death must be a single linked cause – this is to prevent counting individual days of deaths, which realistically would only go up every day and set new records even without the COVID-19 epidemic just because people die every day. Looking for every single death that occurred on every single day would kind of defeat the purpose of this graphic
  • Deaths must take place in a single day – this is to prevent wider ranging causes of death like wars to avoid drowning out this list, and is clearly demonstrated by the use of Galveston, Antietam, etc on this list and not multi-day battles like The Battle of the Bulge or wider ranging conflicts such as wars.

  • 1900 Galveston hurricane - Wikipedia reports anywhere from 6,000 - 12,000 deaths, 8,000 is in the ball park. Wikipedia even says that the 8,000 number is the one most commonly cited, but because of limitations on information gathering the true number of dead will probably remain unknown.

  • Battle of Antietam - Wikipedia reports 3,675 between the Union and Confederate armies, which puts the graphic's number of 3,600 close enough that I won't complain. Notably, this battle took place on a single day, so while it does not take the title of "deadliest battle for American soldiers", those other battles (with one exception, which I will talk about later) do not hold the title for "deadliest day for American Soldiers".

  • September 11th, 2001 Terror Attacks - Wikipedia lists the number of deaths in the combined terror attacks of September 11th as 2,977. This is not including the 19 highjackers who also died on 9/11, which would bring this number to 2,996. However, the number cited on the list includes people who died in the aftermath of the attacks.

2,974 victims were confirmed to have died in the initial attacks. In 2007, the New York City medical examiner's office began to add people who died of illnesses caused by exposure to dust from the site to the official death toll. The first such victim was a woman, a civil rights lawyer, who had died from a chronic lung condition in February 2002. In September 2009, the office added a man who died in October 2008, and in 2011, a male accountant who had died in December 2010.

The proper number for this chart should probably be 2,974, due to deaths that occurred after 9/11 but were counted in the official count, per the rules established above.

  • Attack on Pearl Harbor - Wikipedia cites 2,335 military deaths and 68 civilian deaths during the attack, which matches up with the 2,403 dead on the image

The next four will come from the John Hopkins COVID-19 tracker

  • Last Thursday (3 December 2020) - JH lists 2,879 deaths, image says 2,861

  • Last Wednesday (2 December 2020) - JH lists 2,804 deaths, image says 2,762

  • Last Tuesday (1 December 2020) - JH lists 2,597, image says 2,461

  • Last Friday (4 December 2020) (assumed) - JH lists 2,607, image says 2,439

These all seem to be in the ballpark for the most part, although the numbers for 1 December and 4 December seem to be off and should realistically be flipped. I can chalk this up to the creator using a different dataset or potentially having more preliminary data.

Other events that should realistically be included in this chart.

  • Spanish Flu - October 1918 – there does not seem to be exact data on each day like there is in the case of the COVID-19 epidemic, but most estimates claim that 195,000 Americans died of the Spanish Flu in October 1918. This works out to an average of approximately 6,300 deaths per day over the course of the entire month. Realistically, this should push everything except maybe the Galveston Hurricane off this list.

  • Normandy Landings - 6 June 1944 – estimates put the list of American Soldiers killed during the invasion at 2,501, which would rank it above Pearl Harbor, 1 December 2020, and 4 December 2020 on the original graphic.

  • Battle of Gettysburg - 1-3 June 1863 – estimates are hard to come by due to lack of specific information. Historynet.com puts the casualties for the entire 3 day battle at 7,058, which would put it at an average of 2,352 deaths a day. This average isn't quite enough to get on the list, but most likely one of the days would have made it. Special note goes to 3 June 1863, and specifically Pickett's Charge, as the most likely candidate that would make it on this list.

  • 1906 San Francisco Earthquake - exact numbers are not known, but the United States Geological Survey lists the number of deaths at 3,000+.

  • 15, 7, 21, 29, 23, 14, 22, 30 April 2020, in that order – per JH, each one of these days had a higher death count than Pearl Harbor.

  • 51
    Great answer. I probably would have added a quick aside pointing out how rapidly American population has grown and thus the per-capita death rate of the historical events were likely much higher then covid per-capita death rate; but I'm sure most people who frequent this site are capable of deducing that without it being explicitly called out anyways.
    – dsollen
    Commented Dec 10, 2020 at 18:02
  • 15
    My interpretation would be deaths of both US and non-US citizens on "US soil", but short of a statement by the author, this is just an opinion.
    – Oddthinking
    Commented Dec 10, 2020 at 20:30
  • 17
    If what we're counting is deaths in US soil, the flu pandemic number could be significantly affected, as many of the deaths it caused were of soldiers abroad. Commented Dec 11, 2020 at 0:43
  • 7
    The apples to apples comparison is the Spanish Flu, so I think not including it in the statistics is the most misleading thing here. Commented Dec 11, 2020 at 14:22
  • 21
    Please also note that, as I described in my comment to the OP, the Daily COVID numbers are not accurate because 1) they are the day that deaths are reported, not the day that those deaths occurred and 2) there is no consistency in the day-to-day delays between occurrence and reporting. However, there is fairly high consistency week-to-week, so most responsible sources will also provide 7-day moving averages and focus on weekly averages rather than daily numbers. Commented Dec 11, 2020 at 15:14

Meme is not considering previous flu pandemics, so that is very selective. Consider this Wikipedia quote:

In the United States, ~292,000 deaths were reported between September–December 1918, compared to ~26,000 during the same time period in 1915

enter image description here

That gives us over 2000 dead per day, even in unlikely case deaths were extremely evenly distributed.

This is without the fact that US population was much smaller 102 y ago.

  • Correct, but we don't have daily death tolls for the Spanish Flu. It's understandable why it was omitted even though it's apparent it should take out most if not all of this list. Commented Dec 13, 2020 at 3:48

For what's worth it, the author of the meme was interviewed by CNET, which quoted & paraphraphrased these bits about how the listicle was created:

"The stark differences between American society's reaction to Pearl Harbor, 9/11 and this pandemic hit me so strongly," she said, also giving credit to a similar graphic she saw. She used the best available estimates for the various historical death tolls, and pulled the numbers of COVID-19 deaths from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's COVID Data Tracker. [...]

Some have criticized the graphic for not including daily deaths from other illnesses, for leaving off other major events, or for other reasons. Carey has heard the criticism but still sees the importance of the information. [...]

She has updated the graphic several times since the first version, which included eight deadly days. She'd like to add numbers from the 1918 Spanish flu if she can find accurate sources. But the point remains the same.

"I may update the graphic or make an additional one as the death toll from COVID climbs, and I hate that we know it will," she said. "Will today be the day we lose more people in one day than we did on 9/11? We never should have had to ask that question."

So, if you want to be kind/charitable (rather than slam her for motivated reasoning), call it a work in progress as far as the more absolute claims like "3d most deadliest day" are concerned.

Politifact checked an 8-spot version of same meme, but for a slightly different claim (instead of 3rd deadliest, the old claim was 4 out of 8 most deadly days), and called it "half-true":

The graphic shows that four of the eight deadliest days since the country’s founding took place between Dec. 2 and Dec. 7, 2020. The image places daily COVID-19 deaths from those days alongside death tolls from the Galveston Hurricane, the battle of Antietam, Pearl Harbor and the 9/11 terrorist attacks. [...]

Most of the figures cited are accurate and the general thrust of the claim is valid: The pandemic has produced staggeringly high daily death counts that reached 3,411 on Dec. 9 — a high that came after the image was created.

However, the post contains some problems: It does not take into account daily deaths not linked to a specific cause, and it omits some historical events that resulted in greater numbers of fatalities.

Although the image purports to be a list of the "deadliest days in American history," it only lists fatalities related to specific mass-fatality events. It leaves out the number of deaths from all causes.

For example, the list cites Dec. 4, 2020, as having a death toll of 2,861.

It’s true that 2,861 people were reported on that day to have died of COVID-19, according to the CDC’s Data Tracker. This number doesn’t include any of the people who died from causes besides COVID-19, such as murder, heart attacks or cancer.

In 2017, an average of 7,708 deaths occurred each day, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Other historical events omitted from the chart

The list doesn’t provide an accurate list of the top eight deadliest days in American history.

Perhaps the most notable omission from the list is also the most directly analogous to the COVID-19 pandemic. The 1918 flu pandemic savaged the United States between Sept. 1 and Dec. 31, 1918, killing an estimated 381,019 people in those four months alone. That’s an average of around 3,123 people per day.


Liz Skilton, an associate professor of history at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette, who specializes in natural disasters, disapproved of the way the image compared different types of disastrous events by placing them side by side.

"Different types of disasters rarely ever can be compared directly as there are different sets of hazards and reactions to these hazards that influence the outcome of events," she said. "This is not to say disasters cannot be compared at all, it just means that making direct comparisons between them in an oversimplified way is damaging to our understanding of their impact and could even harm our ability to react to these incidents appropriately."


Our ruling

A viral image claims that the COVID-19 pandemic has caused 4 of the 8 "deadliest days in American history."

The image omits some historical events and only lists fatalities linked to specific causes.

However, the broad claim of the image is accurate: the COVID-19 pandemic has seen daily death totals that have surpassed those of events memorialized as national tragedies, including Pearl Harbor and 9/11.

We rate this image Half True.

As a bit of an aside, but hopefully insightful/related enough, on Covid-19 vs 1918 influenza, there's an August 2020 article in a JAMA journal that more scientifically compared the two (including relative to population), but only for NYC, and only for the first two months of the Covid-19 outbreak (which were the peak/worst till then):

During the peak of the 1918 H1N1 influenza outbreak in New York City, a total of 31,589 all-cause deaths occurred among 5,500,000 residents, yielding an incident rate of 287.17 deaths per 100,000 person-months (95% CI, 282.71-291.69 deaths per 100,000 person-months) (Figure A) The incident rate ratio for all-cause mortality during the H1N1 influenza pandemic compared with corresponding periods from 1914 to 1917 was 2.80 (95% CI, 2.74-2.86). During the early period of the COVID-19 outbreak in New York City, 33,465 all-cause deaths occurred among 8,280,000 residents, yielding an incident rate of 202.08 deaths per 100,000 person-months (95% CI, 199.03-205.17 deaths per 100,000 person-months). (Figure B) The incident rate ratio for all-cause mortality during the study period of 2020 compared with corresponding periods from 2017 through 2019 was 4.15 (95% CI, 4.05-4.24). The incident rate ratio for all-cause mortality during the peak of the 1918 H1N1 influenza pandemic and the early 2020 COVID-19 outbreak was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.69-0.72).

enter image description here

This cohort study found that the absolute increase in deaths over baseline (ie, excess mortality) observed during the peak of 1918 H1N1 influenza pandemic was higher than but comparable to that observed during the first 2 months of the COVID-19 outbreak in New York City.

However, because baseline mortality rates from 2017 to 2019 were less than half that observed from 1914 to 1917 (owing to improvements in hygiene and modern achievements in medicine, public health, and safety), the relative increase during early COVID-19 period was substantially greater than during the peak of the 1918 H1N1 influenza pandemic. [...]

[Concluding:] mortality associated with COVID-19 during the early phase of the New York City outbreak was comparable to the peak mortality observed during the 1918 H1N1 influenza pandemic

In response to a comment the authors made the periods compared more explicit:

we compared the incident rates for all-cause deaths in the first 61 days in which deaths occurred in New York City in 2020 due to COVID-19 to the 61 days of October and November of 1918

So if focusing (or cherry picking) only this badly hit US city for that worst time frame, the comparison isn't too far fetched even with the influenza of 1918, i.e. you could say Covid-19 reached 70% of the severity of the 1918 H1N1 excess mortality when considering that relative ratio of peaks. But there's also the aspect that relative to years before each pandemic Covid-19 was a worse percentage/ratio-wise increase in that peak compared to 1918, i.e. 4.15 vs 2.8.

One of the comments on the article (from an MD) said however that in 1918 NYC had reported below-average excess deaths compared to other US cities, so in that sense the comparison can be misleading as it underestimates the nationwide peak(s) in urban areas for the 1918 influenza. (The veracity of this comment can be verified e.g. with another paper: "During the pandemic, New York City's excess death rate per 1,000 was reportedly 4.7, compared with 6.5 in Boston and 7.3 in Philadelphia.")

  • 10
    Exactly. I saw this meme several days ago and never considered it to be some comprehensive list of deadliest days. It's just a list of highly recognizable (mostly) events that caused large amounts of deaths in a short time period, and comparing them to the current pandemic so people have a scale to compare to. It's also a measure of how people react covid deaths vs, say, 9/11 when there was a massive outcry about the death toll. Commented Dec 11, 2020 at 20:01
  • @computercarguy Locality might matter, if considering reactions. 9-11 occurred at 4 sites, most damage in a single pair of buildings. Then there's the fact that there's someone to blame. Aside from "people died", the two items have no similarities, just like much of the rest of the list (your initial point).
    – user11643
    Commented Dec 13, 2020 at 1:43
  • 1
    I'm confused by "baseline mortality rates from 2017 to 2019 were less than half that observed from 1914 to 1917 (owing to improvements in hygiene and modern achievements in medicine, public health, and safety)". The baseline of 100 deaths on average per 100,000 person-months works out to a life expectancy of 1000 months (~83 years), but 50 deaths per 100,000 is a life expectancy of ~160 years. Unless I've misunderstood the statistic, I can only assume this means people tend to move out of New York before dying these days, rather than it being due to improvements in hygiene, etc. ?
    – Dave
    Commented Dec 13, 2020 at 11:30
  • Politifact's analysis is flawed. It would have benefited from consulting a researcher in medical statistics, not history. “This number doesn’t include any of the people who died from causes besides COVID-19”—_of course_ it doesn't, and shouldn't. The key words are excess deaths that are quoted more than once from the JAMA paper, but conspicuously absent from the Politifact's analysis, unfortunately. Commented Aug 11, 2021 at 8:21
  • @Dave, this is a very good question. You cannot compute life expectancy given death rate alone. 50 per 100K would yield the life expectancy of 160 years only if the population of New York were constant for the previous 160 years, but this is obviously very far from being the case. More people were born than died, which made a growing population younger overall. The death rate is driven down by birth or immigration of younger people, or any people with a higher life expectancy at the moment of their addition to the existing population pool, as long as the arrival rate exceeds the death rate. Commented Aug 11, 2021 at 8:36

The particular claim being made of "deadliest days in American history" is not supported by the data provided.

Aside from the significant missing events listed in DenisS' answer, what the graphic shows and what the claim states are two different things. The graphic shows deaths caused by a single cause on a particular single day. It does not show total deaths on a particular day and, therefore, cannot be used to determine what the "deadliest days in American history" were, which is the claim made in the caption added above the original graphic and that the question title asks about.

According to the U.S. Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC's) National Center for Health Statistics, in 2018, 2,839,205 Americans died. That works out to an average of 7,778.6 deaths per day. Thus, an average day in 2018 had about 2.5 times as many American deaths as the number that the claim is ascribing to "the third deadliest day in American history."

In order to correctly make claims of the "deadliest days in American history," one would need information on total deaths on each day, not the deaths on a particular day only attributable to a single cause.

Thus, a more accurate version of the claim would be about the "deadliest single-day, single-cause events in American history," though, even with that version of the claim, there are still a significant number of missing events as pointed out in DenisS' answer, not the least of them being the Spanish Flu pandemic during which the average day in October 1918 claimed more than twice as many lives from the Spanish flu as were claimed by Covid-19 on the day in question.

  • 8
    The claim is pretty clearly not talking about all cause mortality. Your comparison seems like a straw man argument. When a claimant has a reasonable interpretation of data, insisting that another reasonable interpretation of data is the only correct one is not useful. Commented Dec 13, 2020 at 1:34
  • 5
    @BobTheAverage The chart is clearly not all-cause mortality. However, the text added above it, which the title of this question suggests that it is asking about, specifically says "3rd deadliest day in American history" which has only one reasonable interpretation, which is all-cause mortality. The most gracious reasonably possible interpretation of that wording is that it is intentionally misleading.
    – reirab
    Commented Dec 13, 2020 at 2:56
  • 2
    @BobTheAverage Note that my answer already specifically points out the difference between the chart and the statement made above it.
    – reirab
    Commented Dec 13, 2020 at 3:07
  • 2
    @BobTheAverage It says "deadliest days". The reasonable interpretation of "deadliest days" is "days when the most people died" Commented Dec 13, 2020 at 15:10
  • 2
    "The most gracious reasonably possible interpretation of that wording is that it is intentionally misleading." Don't ascribe to malice what you can otherwise ascribe to ignorance and stupidity.
    – user11643
    Commented Dec 14, 2020 at 16:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .