Given how slaves cost tens of thousands of dollars in today's money at the time of the American Civil War, I was surprised to read in a number of places (Wikipedia, Reuters, CNN) that the average price of a slave today is $90. The ultimate source for these claims appears to be University of Nottingham professor Kevin Bales. In a paper, he asserts that "slaves [are] less expensive today than at any time in the past", based on field observations.

Is this figure accurate? Are there independent sources that back it up?

New contributor
Stack Overflown is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
  • 5
    You have a book by a university professor, and two reputable news organizations, What would you consider an "independent source" if they are not? – DJClayworth Oct 17 at 0:23
  • 1
    I'd worry of a cherry pick... In what time and place? Surely slave pricing hasn't been relatively constant in the Americas? – fredsbend Oct 17 at 1:43
  • 3
    @DJClayworth By "independent" I mean not relying on Bales's figures. Not to say they are untrustworthy, but I'd like to see it backed up by other sources. – Stack Overflown Oct 17 at 21:40
  • 2
    The wikipedia article touches a few possible reasons - mainly that slaves are not necessarily bought or traded at all. Many get into such a dependency relation through poverty and despair, possibly semi-deliberal. Some even pay someone to be transferred to a first-world country in hope of a better life, but end up in slavery instead. And the usefullness/value for the "owner" may be reduced by slavery being illegal, as it makes it impossible (or at least risky) to use them openly. – Hulk 2 days ago
  • 1
    Another possible reason would be if the bulk of todays slavery happens in less developed countries. – Hulk 2 days ago

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .