38

These existing questions ask whether the blue lights, not blue light filters, from computer screens affect sleep:

My question is if blue light filters, not blue lights, have been shown to make sleep harder, and not just having any impact, contrary to its intention to make sleep easier.

A 9to5Google article says:

The University of Manchester published a study (via the Guardian) that found blue light filters may actually trick our brains into thinking it’s daytime, exactly the thing they were designed to avoid.

AndroidAuthority also reports the story, and mentions the study was done on mice.

  • 1
    A discussion about what constitutes a "blue light filter" has been moved to chat, as it's no longer necessary (OP clarified the question). – tim Aug 7 at 6:45
58

This is the study itself if you want to read it. Yes it is a study in mice. It is evidence but not proof that blue filters are counter-productive, at least according to the authors of this single, peer-reviewed study. This is a fairly typical example of media fixating on a single study and making it out to a bigger deal than it actually is. More research is needed.

| improve this answer | |
  • Oh thanks so there's pretty much just this 1 study so far and so the status quo that blue light filter is helpful (or at least not harmful) still stands? – BCLC Aug 3 at 17:53
  • 8
    @BCLC I'd only say yes if there are other studies showing that these filters are effective, but I've not really looked in to that and don't know if that's the case. – Brian Z Aug 3 at 18:00
  • oh yeah i didn't say 'just this 1 study'. i said 'pretty much just this 1 study'. hmmm... probably same thingy. thanks! – BCLC Aug 4 at 3:55
  • 13
    Note that this study compares light of equal intensity. At least when I use the blue light filter on my Android device, I use it to lower the screen brightness by (partially) cutting out 2/3 of the light emitting pixels (i.e. the ones not red). This is useful because in a completely dark room, the minimum brightness is still brighter than necessary. – Nobody Aug 4 at 11:37
  • 3
    Hmm, apparently, Sci-Hub somehow breaks the usual public opinion (that I met online) of copyright infringement as bad: see e.g. here. As for SE policy, it appears to be OK: see this discussion. – Ruslan Aug 5 at 13:05

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .