There are conflicting reports of whether it is possible to safely recharge alkaline batteries (not lithium) that are not sold as rechargable. The packaging for batteries regularly has cautions against recharging. However, there are also claims that they can be successfully recharged (e.g. Ref, Ref, Ref).

One of the recharger manufacturers claims:

Our Alkaline battery charger will recharge standard alkaline batteries up to 20 times depending the type and quality of batteries used.

It is unclear whether the battery manufacturers claims are just trying to sell more batteries. Can single-use, alkaline batteries be safely and successfully recharged in standard battery chargers?

  • 1
    Are there any reports of recharging non-rechargeables can't be answered, because nobody knows all possible reports, and every minute, a new report can pop up somewhere. Commented Jun 22, 2011 at 1:29
  • 1
    Skeptics is about researching the evidence behind the claims you hear or read. It is not for idle speculation. As such, this question is off-topic.
    – Borror0
    Commented Jun 22, 2011 at 5:20
  • 2
    I disagree with the closure. I will edit the question to see if I can make it more palatable to others.
    – Oddthinking
    Commented Jun 22, 2011 at 5:32
  • 2
    What if you ask this on Electronics SE?
    – sharptooth
    Commented Jun 22, 2011 at 8:48
  • 2
    not sure if i should post this as an answer, but when i was a kid (10 or so years ago) we had a batter charger for non-rechargeable batteries! it definitely worked. I don't remember the brand or anything though :(
    – Patricia
    Commented Jun 22, 2011 at 14:02

2 Answers 2


So far, this appears to be a Yes, provided one has the right tools.

I was first going to look at the chemistry involved, but figured it would be easier to just look at one of the top hits for chargers claiming to do this and examine its patent.

One such device is the Battery Xtender.

I searched for patents containing "alkaline battery recharger" and came across a few. I wanted to try to figure out which one was responsible for the "patented technology" claim in the link above. I simply searched the applicant's name and "battery xtender" and got it on the first hit: JD Pfeiffer of Quebec, Canada, owns the trademark to Battery Xtender, and his patent application was granted under US Patent #5,543,702 (LINK).

You can read the patent, which contains circuit diagrams and descriptions of preferred current supplies and test methods to determine when charging is completed.

Now... does it work? I can't be sure without testing one, but one of the requirements for a granted US Patent is utility -- it has to be useful (LINK). A charger that doens't charge is not useful. Assuming the US Patent Office is doing their job, the data provided by the applicant with the application showed that this device was useful!

You do have to jump through some hoops for this -- charging alkaline batteries requires that they not be depleted. Here's a page from their manual (LINK):

battery xtender manual page

So, note that instead of using an alkaline battery until it's dead, one would cut it off about about 1/5 to 1/6 of it's normal life and recharge it. I don't know how long it takes to recharge, but this might amount to having an extra set or two of batteries if one is to keep cycling like this.

Wiki has an article HERE about this which references pulsed current for charging; the whole article is quite vague and un-referenced, though. I didn't see anything about pulsing in my read of the Pfeiffer patent.

So, with the right type of charger, one does appear to be able to recharge alkaline batteries intended for single use if recharged frequently and before draining very much.

I wish there were more available test data from this device from external users/organizations. So far, nothing like that. Here's the best I was able to find. Perhaps some independent, controlled tests/reviews will come about down the road.

  • 13
    The USPTO don't carefully check that an invention actually works, so there is a limited amount you can conclude from a patent's claims.
    – Oddthinking
    Commented Aug 13, 2012 at 11:52
  • 2
    -1. While this is definitely a well-written answer, I believe the sources are insufficient and the conclusion is incorrect. As Oddthinking pointed out, an idea doesn't actually have to work to be patented (there are many patents for perpetual motion machines, for example). If a device like this was real, I'd expect to see it on Amazon for sale and have reviews from some well-known organizations. On top of that, I don't believe the chemical design of an alkaline battery allows for recharging.
    – Bigbio2002
    Commented Apr 9, 2013 at 16:14
  • @Bigbio2002 I did try to cover the "doesn't actually have to work to be patented" issue by citing the necessary requirement for utility. Your are wrong about perpetual motion machines; a quick Google search -> first Wiki hit showed that: "[The USPTO] has made an official policy of refusing to grant patents for perpetual motion machines without a working model." The chemistry avenue would be a fantastic one to show and would indeed eliminate a lot of speculation I had to make with the limited sources above. ETA: just saw your answer!
    – Hendy
    Commented Apr 15, 2013 at 16:05
  • 1
    I knew a guy that had one of these. It worked, but wasn't worth the hassle of battery management. [citation: some guy] Commented Apr 19, 2013 at 18:31
  • 2
    I had one about twenty years ago, and it worked. It didn't work well, and wouldn't restore batteries to anywhere near full capacity; but I could get a few more hours on my radio, etc. So, one more anecdote. (By the way, I had some batteries rupture and discharge chemicals while charging, which might be why you don't see these devices around much.) Commented Sep 24, 2013 at 19:40

It cannot be done safely, or with more than limited success. Your results may vary.

First, we need to understand how batteries work. Two chemicals with opposite charges are separated in a cell. When a circuit is completed from the cathode (+) to the anode (-), electromagnetism happens and the two chemicals react with each other, releasing electricity, until they are in equilibrium and the battery is dead.

In order to recharge a battery, an opposite electric charge needs to be applied to the battery in attempt to reverse the reaction and restore the two chemicals to their original state. However, this is not possible with all materials. The professor states that...

nonrechargeable, or primary, batteries can be based on irreversible chemical changes. For example, the carbon-fluoride-lithium primary batteries often used in cameras generate energy by converting (CF)n and Li metal to carbon and LiF. But the starting material at the battery's cathode, (CF)n, is not reformed when a reverse potential is applied. Instead the cell electrolyte decomposes, and eventually the fluoride is oxidized to form fluorine gas.

The professor goes on to say that...

A reversible chemical change is not the only requirement for rechargeable batteries, however. To be classified as rechargeable, the battery must be able to undergo the reverse reaction efficiently, so that hundreds or even thousands of recharging cycles are possible. In addition, there must often be provisions to ensure that the recharging process can occur safely.

(emphasis mine)

In reference to alkaline batteries specifically...

The alkaline batteries (which are generally based on the conversion of MnO2 and Zn to Mn3O4 and ZnO) offer an excellent example of this last point. Although the chemical changes at the electrodes can be reversed, until recently alkaline batteries were manufactured only to function as primary cells. Recharging one of these primary cells could allow the battery to be reused, but the possible number of recharging cycles for such a cell is very limited--it performs more poorly with each recharge. More important, recharging an old-fashioned alkaline battery is not safe. During or after a recharge, the battery might generate enough hydrogen gas to cause an explosion.

This is why there are so few products available on the market, and why the ones that do exist often get poor ratings due to battery leakage (see the comments). While the chemical reaction can technically be reversed, the basic construction of a cheap, single-use battery does not provide for handling of any hydrogen buildup (which causes leaks) or protection against the degradation of the cell's contents (which limits their rechargeability).

  • Thanks for the answer, and awesome to have one with more of the chemistry. For the most part, I think we're saying the same thing -- it's possible, but there are caveats (inefficient, not discharging completely, long charge times, etc.). I didn't incorporate the safety aspect, however, and that's really important. Thanks for covering that. For public's sake, I'm going to look into that more and update my answer as I don't want to lead anyone to harm.
    – Hendy
    Commented Apr 15, 2013 at 16:50
  • I once measured the voltage across a AA battery which had been back-fed in a 12-volt (eight-cell) string and found that even after being disconnected from the string it had a significant reverse voltage (about -1V) that remained at least for awhile even with a 100-ohm resistor across it (passing about 10mA). I doubt it could have supplied that much current very long, but I wonder what chemistry would have allowed it to build up any significant reverse charge?
    – supercat
    Commented Jul 9, 2015 at 23:04

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .