Blogger Hendrik Wintjen writes:
Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger is known for the phrase “The total number of minds in the universe is one. In fact, consciousness is a singularity phasing within all beings.”
Did he say that?
-
2Likely this isn’t notable enough for this site since it appears to only be a quote from a random blogger. My guess is that it is a made up quote. “Singularity phasing” is word salad, a nonsensical phrasing in physics as far as I’m aware. – Jarrod Christman Apr 28 '20 at 10:34
-
3@JarrodChristman I think it's meant to be read as "consciousness is a singularity [that is] phasing within all beings". It would make more sense if there was a comma there. – F1Krazy Apr 28 '20 at 10:43
-
ascienceofspirit.wordpress.com/2016/05/02/… – Daniel R Hicks Apr 28 '20 at 12:04
-
stephenpickering.com/2011/12/29/… – Daniel R Hicks Apr 28 '20 at 12:05
-
5IIRC Schrödinger was keen on philosophy, and had a strong interest in monistic Hindu traditions. This quote sounds like monism, so doesn't sound too out of place. Assuming the quote (if real) comes from his philosophical/theological writings rather than his physics ones, the terms used might be used in a broader sense than a physicist would expect. – Jack B Apr 28 '20 at 13:43
|
Show 2 more comments
It appears that this quote was fabricated and mis-attributed to Schrödinger in May of 2016. It is impressive how widely this mis-attribution has spread, first across the internet and then to a number of books, but it does not seem to date back any further than that.
If the listed date on this blog post is accurate, it is probably the original source of the fabricated quote: http://ascienceofspirit.wordpress.com/2016/05/02/number-of-minds-in-the-universe-is-one/
The same quote also appeared to have been added on or shortly before May 26 2016 to this list of alleged quotations: https://web.archive.org/web/20160526132013/https://stephenpickering.com/2011/12/29/cosmic-consciousness-quotes-vol-1/
If Schrödinger ever did use these words, it would almost certainly show up in Google Books or even random websites that predate these examples. At best it may be a paraphrase of something he actually said in the lecture "Mind and Matter". but those words do not appear there.
-
7He said some similar sounding things (according Wikiquote). Couldn't it just be a recent translation that used a different phrasing? (Genuine question.) – Oddthinking♦ Apr 28 '20 at 16:40
-
1If that were the case, it should not be hard to find the translation. Which "similar sounding things" specifically do you propose might fit this quote? I don't see any candidates, but if we have one we can look for alternate translations. – Brian Z Apr 28 '20 at 19:17
