5

Talk show host Glenn Beck said on BlazeTV in February 2020 (at the 33:54 mark of this video):

Kolomoyskyi’s company Burisma was implicated in a money-laundering ring. Hunter Biden then, knowing this, goes to work for him a few weeks later. The State Department then lifts a travel ban because Joe Biden asks for it. And then a few months after that, Vice President Biden and John Kerry lobby for 1.8 billion dollars to be delivered directly into his bank, and that just goes poof.

I’m interested in the part in bold. This is a reference to the State Department’s 2015 decision to grant a US Visa to Ukrainian oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky, ending an entry ban he had been under for several years.

My question is, is Beck right that then-Vice President Joe Biden asked the State Department to do this?

1
2

Circumstantial at best. We have this from Tablet Magazie that details the specifics of the lifting of the travel ban. While theoretically the direction could have come from the Secretary of State or Joe Biden, such involvement was a complete omission from those that were close to the affair. Here a Reformer, who would be antagonistic to perpetuating corruption (although he could be more concerned about Ukrainian corruption, makes the case that the deal was between the Ukrainian US embassy and a third party.

The news of his departure from Ukraine—and that the American embassy in Kiev had relented on the oligarch’s longstanding visa ban—was delivered over Facebook by reformist member of the Rada (Ukraine’s Parliament), Sergey Leschenko. Leschenko was one of the idealistic young MPs who fought against Kolomoisky’s power inside the Rada. His post, translated into English below, was understandably euphoric:

News on my favourite topic. Kolomoisky took advantage of a recent conversation with the US ambassador in order to expiate himself of his American visa ban. This was brokered by the rabbi of Dnipropetrovsk Kaminetsky, who is an American citizen. A special exception was made, and Kolomoisky was issued a short stay, single entry visa for the US, where he is now mostly devoting his spare time to attending basketball games. Kolomoiskiy’s family members, were in contrast, given ten-year visas. However, sources do not specify whether Kolomoisky had the visa placed in his Ukrainian, Israeli or Cypriot passports.

3
  • 8
    You should take out "Circumstantial at best", because there isn't even any trace of circumstantial evidence suggesting involvement by Biden. – Keshav Srinivasan Feb 21 '20 at 19:40
  • Kolomoysky is one of the richest men in Ukraine. He is certainly a more important person there than the President of Ukraine A decision like that can be made only by a very highly placed official in the US. – user56345 Jul 20 '20 at 21:52
  • 2
    ... and Ukraine was in Joe Biden's sphere of responsibility. So what other traces of evidence do you need? Either Biden asked for/agreed with this decision or he was totally incompetent and did not pay attention to the region he was supposed to supervise It is hard to believe in the second possibility. – user56345 Jul 20 '20 at 22:43
1

Offering an alternative explanation to the one already given. I came across this as part of my own research, so take this with a grain of salt (although I certainly don't buy into the fluffy "rabbi" explanation).

In this Harper's Magazine article, Matthew Rojansky, director of the Kennan Institute at the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars is quoted by the author:

Poroshenko [...] enlisted ambassador Pyatt, [...] in a deal to remove his rival from the scene. “My understanding is that part of the deal whereby Kolomoisky gave up his attempt to take over control of Ukrnafta and UkrTransNafta and gave up governorship of Dnipropetrovsk and gave up having his pawn in control of Odessa,” Rojansky told me, “was that the U.S. ambassador came in as an intermediary guarantor and said if you do these things, we will take you off the visa bad list.”

So we have at least one source, Rojanksy - who seems to be well-respected - with the understanding that the State Department (in the form of Pyatt) was directly involved in lifting the ban, apparently at the request of Poroshenko.

We can only speculate as to whether or not Poroshenko had in turn spoken directly to Biden about this request as well. None of the leaked phone calls between Biden and Poroshenko have anything about it (at least not the ones we have heard so far).

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .