There's a photo going around Twitter and the right-wing blogosphere of a woman standing in the nude at an art exhibition attended by a bunch of teenagers.

I do not want to embed this photo, as it includes nudity..

Here is where I saw it:

Kane: "Insane Photo — What are they teaching our kids!" posted on CitizenFreePress on July 28, 2019 12:31 am (archived here: http://archive.is/Yd8pS)

Where is this photo from, and is it real or photoshopped?

  • 28
    A big hello to the visitors via Hot Network Questions. Welcome to Skeptics. Please don't post your opinions or answers in the comments.
    – Oddthinking
    Commented Jul 27, 2019 at 10:37
  • 19
    @TheAsh In many countries people would think nothing about it, and fifteen year old kids wouldn't need anyone to go anywhere.
    – gnasher729
    Commented Jul 29, 2019 at 6:22
  • 35
    @TheAsh Europeans (especially Nordics) don't get aerated about nudity the way US Americans do.
    – RedSonja
    Commented Jul 29, 2019 at 7:13
  • 9
    @TheAsh “self-evident” is cultural, unless there is an inherent biological reason (which is not applicable here). Some cultures frown upon all nudity, some frown upon nudity exposed to children, some cultures don't care. There is a need to be skeptical only if event took place in culture which cares. Personally, I was well into adulthood when I was told that in (for example) the United States, a children's TV program would be unlikely to show nudity (and I still don't know if I was told so correctly, and now makes me wonder if clothing optional beaches in the USA ban children).
    – gerrit
    Commented Jul 29, 2019 at 13:50
  • 14
    @TheAsh True, any photo depicting a phenomenon uncontroversial in one culture but controversial in another could be checked for "is it authentic?". I'm not questioning the clarify of the question, I'm just wondering about the degree of doubtability. What's next? "Are droppings real?", "Do American kids really sing to the flag every morning?", or maybe "Is this picture of children hunting in the mountains real?"
    – gerrit
    Commented Jul 29, 2019 at 14:00

3 Answers 3


The photo is real: unstaged and not 'doctored'. But all the surrounding text from the originating claim is misleading.

The photo depicts the artist Mare Tralla. And some visitors to an art exhibition called Naine & Naine at the Pärnu Summer festival.

It is important to note that she was scheduled to open the exhibition. An exhibition that also showed works by artist Marko Mäetamm whose works are seen in the pictures.

These are his works on the wall and Tralla believes these to be sexist. That's why she undressed unexpectedly and began to hang sheets over Mäetamm's paintings with slogan's meant to criticise and expose these sexism depicted on them. As Tralla was only expected to deliver a speech, and not that much more, it was indeed 'a scandal' in Estonia as well. (Scandal in the Art Hall: Mare Tralla considers the work of a male colleague sexist)

Opening the exhibition "Woman and Woman" in Pärnu on Saturday, Mare Tralla caused a scandal with her naked performance: the artist covered the work of Marko Mäetamm, who performed at the exhibition with anti-sex slogans.

However, this is not the only exhibition that explores the boundaries of Pärnu. It could even be said that the summer capital will become the act capital of Estonia. After the 26th nude exhibition "Man, Woman, Freedom" opened in Pärnu City Gallery last Saturday, a man and a man depicting the human body was unveiled, and a bold "Woman and Woman" was set up in the artist house of the city. Tralla's "performance of protest" is now part of the exhibition.

Exhibition “Man, Woman, Freedom” at the Museum of New Art in Pärnu offers a good selection of works by different authors. There are paintings, photos, sculptures, silk paintings, woodcuts and video art outside. In addition, the works of two authors, Kaupo Kikkas' biblically-influenced landscape of human figures and rare photographs of Ernest Hemingway by US painter Waldo Peirce, have been set up in separate halls.
–– Indrek Tark, Eesti Päevaleht, 1 Juuli 2019

The so accused artist says to this:

"I have white skin, I'm a hetero, a team artist too. But in my opinion, my work speaks to women's supremacy," published artist Marko Mäetamm, whose works were criticized by a female artist participating in the grand exhibition Pärnu Art Summer.
–– Anu Jürisson: "Marko Mäetamm: I stand for my work until I die" – The work of the male artist came under criticism from the female artist, Pärnu Postimees, June 30, 2019.

That means that the headline from CitizenFreePress ("Insane Photo — What the hell are they teaching our kids!") is a incorrect. These are not "our kids" but Estonian visitors to an art exhibition. And this is not about officially "teaching" anything off of the curriculum in school, but an unexpected presence of protest at an art gallery.

The claim-accompanying Twitter post is even worse:

School kids recently went on a trip to a feminist "art exhibit" and this is what they saw. This is child abuse. This is insanity. This is the lunacy of left wing social engineering in action.

The kids and adults in the picture went to an art exhibition where a male artist displayed his sexually explicit works said to be sexist and abusive of women. A woman protested against this by disrobing. It is difficult to see how this can be accurately described as "the lunacy of left wing social engineering in action".

A better write-up can – at least partially – be found in other English-speaking media, in this case even another right-wing extremists:

As one circular reports on this picture:

The video in the above link is indeed useful to grasp the atmosphere of the 'performance'.

Regarding 'teaching' and school, it is also relevant that the event took place at the opening of the exhibition. That was a Saturday. 29 June 2019 is also interesting as 12. June 2019 to 31. August 2019 are school summer holidays in Estonia. It may be a bit hasty to infer from that that 'teaching', 'school' and 'this picture' do not have that many connections to a 'school forcing kids', but I'll just go ahead and do that: No school forced any of their teenager students to participate on a Saturday evening during the holidays to go there.

Most people in the picture are adults. For example, the female cap-wearer in front of six female breasts and three vaginas isn't a teenager but art historian Marian Kivila. While she is the curator of this exhibition, she seems to react in her personal way to individual exhibits.

enter image description here

The Pärnu Summer Art festival site describes the intent of the 'exhibition' as:

On June 29, two exhibitions - “Man and Man” and “Woman and Woman” will be opened in Pärnu City Gallery's two exhibition halls. Although the names of the exhibitions may refer to another traditional Pärnu big man and woman's summer exhibition in Pärnu, the exhibitions are not an extension, criticism or parody of the UKM project. Rather, the exhibitions could be seen as an attempt to engage in dialogue with the Pärnu traditions, as well as to dissolve the tradition as a very multi-layered cultural phenomenon and its nature in the sense of body and gender art.

"Man and Man" and "Woman and Woman" bring to the audience the works of Estonian (and one of Russia) artists who, directly or indirectly, dissect the subject of gender roles. And not in the narrow context of erotic art, but in an attempt to open up body and gender reflections in the narrower sense – through everyday humor (Marko Mäetamm), through socio-political-historical prism (Leonhard Lapin, Sandra Jõgeva, Mare Tralla), through contemporary mythology (Andrus Joonas), through the autobiographical spectrum (Rene Kari, Evelin Zolotko), through feminist approaches and the irony of stereotypical gender roles (Lilia Li-Mi-Yan), but also in many other ways.

Participating artists: Mare Tralla, Sandra Jõgeva, Evelin Zolotko (HUUPI), Lilia Li-Mi-Yan, Kiwa, Marko Mäetamm, Rene Kari, Jaanus Samma, Leonhard Lapin, Peeter Allik, Andrus Joonas, Alar Raudoja, Alan Prosa, Anonymous Boh.

Curators of the exhibition are Marian Kivila and Jan Leo Grau (Avangard Gallery, NGO)

For anyone non-Estonian reading along and wondering about cultural differences in attitude towards really "teaching about sexuality": in Estonia's schools sexuality-related education starts in grade 5 and the UNESCO judges Estonia's approach to STDs, pregnancies, etc. as very effective.

Kai Haldre & Kai Part & Evert Ketting: "Youth sexual health improvement in Estonia, 1990–2009: The role of sexuality education and youth-friendly services", The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, October 2012; 17: 351–362

Translations from Estonian via Google Translate. Please improve!

  • 2
    I removed some editorialising. I removed lots of comments both praising and complaining about the levels of editorializing.
    – Oddthinking
    Commented Aug 4, 2019 at 8:26
  • 1
    @Oddthinking Hm, why is the para about the obvious target group – more important: the 'feely torsos' – editorialising? As the whole show was about sex & gender but the torsos proof in picture that the claim itself is bigotry & sexism and as such important context. Commented Aug 4, 2019 at 8:32
  • 1
    I haven't seen confirmation that the 'feely torsos' where being protested against, and I remain agnostic about whether they are bigoted or sexist - that needs a lot more context and art appreciation than I have. What remained appeared to be attacking the Right for attacking the Left, which was getting far away from the original question - are these fake photos?
    – Oddthinking
    Commented Aug 4, 2019 at 9:00
  • 4
    @Oddthinking But that's just the point. They weren't protested against, as no-one identified them as such in a month old picture/video, even now they raise mostly eyebrows (what's that?), but everyone went ballistic when focussed on the deliberate misinformation they got with captions ("ugly live female forced on our school kids"). That's why the "Photo fake?" also needs the tiny frame challenge of "pixels OK, but context pure propaganda, intentionally, and obvious if you take a closer look". Left out context is the wrong half-answer and would just re-inforce the lie. Commented Aug 4, 2019 at 9:35
  • 3
    It is bigotry to focus "see, unexpected nude Tralla" when there are 3 nice vulvas meant to be touched. Commented Aug 4, 2019 at 9:36

The Short Answer

This is a real photograph of a respected artist in Estonia presenting a creative work to an audience of various ages. The composition of the audience appears to be unremarkable to those present in the photo.

The Detailed Answer

The image is real in that it does not appear to be substantively altered. There are no apparent artifacts of a digital recomposition from multiple independently captured or synthesized images, and more compelling there exists a real event from which this image seems likely to have originated.

This image appears to be a photograph of the artist Mare Tralla in an exhibit at Pärnu City Gallery Artists House.

So to the question "Is this photo showing a woman posing in the nude before teenagers real?", the answer is almost definitely yes.

However, by questioning the veracity of an otherwise unremarkable photo the question suggests that it is uncommon or unreasonable for a woman to be nude in the presence of teenagers, but this cannot be assumed given the photo alone as evidence. Very little if anything can be inferred from the observation that the photo is "real." Certainly nothing along the lines that the linked article claims.

Nudity is reasonable, meaning acceptable to society, in many contexts including and especially art in the United States and other countries. This photo is from Estonia so must be judged in the context of contemporary Estonian culture and whatever specific context surrounded the photo at the time. The evidence on the face of it is that no one in the photo appears to be alarmed at either the nudity or the age of anyone present. Lacking any indication otherwise we must, therefore, conclude that this is acceptable and reasonable in the context to those present, and so is of no particular note. In other words the question draws attention to elements of the image that are immaterial to determining its authenticity.

Mare Tralla appears to be a well-respected artist with a Bachelors of Arts from the Estonian Academy of Arts (1995), and a Masters from the University of Westminster, London (1997). She has curated exhibitions, chaired symposiums, edited books and made many other significant contributions to art and culture. There is even a Wikipedia article about her (in Estonian). She is 52.

  • 11
    @TheAsh Not sure what you mean by that. The kids look like they think she's being silly.
    – pipe
    Commented Jul 28, 2019 at 14:31
  • 10
    The conclusion that no-one is visibly objecting in one photo and therefore it is reasonable is not a safe one. I don't think it adds to this answer, and recommend removing it.
    – Oddthinking
    Commented Jul 28, 2019 at 14:39
  • 8
    @TheAsh The fact that nudity occurs widely in art even in the US indicates that the majority of people do think it acceptable. Commented Jul 29, 2019 at 17:11
  • 4
    @AaronF: Please read it again. I did not equate this with rape. I do not care about your opinion on whether this is acceptable or reasonable, just as I am sure you don't care about mine. I do care that there appears to be a claim (although it has been refuted) that a lack of alarm means that it is acceptable and reasonable. I am showing that argument is unsound with a counter example where the same argument fails.
    – Oddthinking
    Commented Jul 29, 2019 at 19:16
  • 6
    @TheAsh - Keep in mind that this is Estonia, whose sauna culture is second only perhaps to that of Finland. Non-sexual nudity is not uncommon. Commented Jul 30, 2019 at 0:23

The photo is from an Estonian exhibition. The exhibit runs "29.06 – 3.08.2019" or June 29th 2019 through August 3rd 2019. Evidence that this is the correct exhibit is that some of the visitors on the citizenfreepress web site image (such as the woman in the pink hat) are also in the exhibit photographs on the linnagalerii web site. I don't believe it is Photoshopped.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .