It is widely believed that men are more amenable to offers of casual sex than women.

(Note: This is a different claim to "men want casual sex more than women" or that "women are more easily able to find casual sex partners". A Quora thread on heterosexual casual sex, Is it easier for women to find partners when they want to have sex? has many (unreferenced) answers that explain why, even if a woman's desire for casual sex matched that of a man, there might still be reasons for her to be wary, including: orgasm gap, lack of emotional connection, slut shaming, risk factors including pregnancy, STIs and violence.)

Are men more likely than women to accept offers of casual sex?

  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    – Oddthinking
    Commented Feb 23, 2019 at 14:35

2 Answers 2


I sincerely hope someone finds a newer result, but one of the textbook studies for this is one from 1978, and repeated in 1982 with nearly identical results. The study was set at Florida State University, and had people of both genders asking strangers one of three questions:

  • Would you go out with me tonight?
  • Would you come over to my apartment tonight?
  • Would you go to bed with me tonight?

The results for the more innocent "go out" question were similar between genders, but the others went heavily against males. This chart shows the success rates:

Requestor Date Apartment Bed
Male 56 6 0
Female 50 69 75

Not only that, but the responses themselves varied between genders, with men more likely to respond with something like "Why do we have to wait until tonight?", while women were more likely to respond with "You've got to be kidding" or similar. All this points to yes, it is easier for women to get casual sex.

However, like I said, this study is from 40 years ago. Cultural norms have certainly changed in most aspects, and I'd love to see some updated results from a similar study.

  • 2
    @IsBegot I agree with your comment. I mean: college age and place is a "prime example" of environment where casual sex is very common and even popularized. My opinion is that trying the same test in kids of 15 years old or grown men of 50 may yield completely different results (and I'm pretty sure that the results would change for women too).
    – Bakuriu
    Commented Feb 20, 2019 at 19:51
  • 3
    @Bakuriu It may simply be due to cultural expectations of who should be the initiator. Especially during that time period, men were "supposed to" initiate both dates and sex. Men may have been leery about a woman who initiates a date, but then throw that caution aside if it's clear upfront that it's just going to be sex.
    – Is Begot
    Commented Feb 20, 2019 at 19:53
  • 1
    @Bakuriu - If we assume that all of the "accepting" men are interested in at least the possibility of sex, it makes sense that they would be more likely to accept offers which promise a higher chance of having sex at a lower cost. A date might lead to "your place or mine", which might then lead to sex, with at least minor effort required to make each transition. Going straight to bed is a near-guarantee of sex with no transitions or (preliminary) effort required. Kind of like if you wanted to be rich, you might accept a job offer, but would almost certainly accept an offer of $1000000 in cash. Commented Feb 21, 2019 at 9:32
  • 1
    @GiacomoAlzetta - I wasn't attempting to address the male vs. female numbers. I was specifically responding to a comment wondering why male date would be less than male apartment/sex, so that is the only aspect of the data that I attempted to explain. Commented Feb 21, 2019 at 10:23
  • 6
    @Bakuriu There is somewhat of a social norm (and it was certainly stronger in the 1978) that "date" means "a man and a woman go to a restaurant, and the man pay for both meals in the hope that it leads to sex". So, it may not merely be that men are more cautious when it comes to serious relationships, but rather that men are more cautious about spending resources in pursuit of relationships that women are about accepting resources knowing that a man is hoping for a relationship. Commented Feb 24, 2019 at 17:55

For a newer study, I've found a study that:

They concluded their meta-analysis, and two experiments they carried out, with:

However, men were more liberal in their choice in either condition, compared to the female subjects.

First, they show results of Clark and Hatfield of 1989 (brought in the other answer), summarised as:

In their study, four male and five female psychology students approached a total of 96 opposite-sex subjects at Florida State University. After a standard introduction, ‘‘I have been noticing you around campus. I find you to be very attractive,’’ the experimenter’s confederates asked one of three questions randomly: ‘‘Would you go out with me tonight?’’,‘‘Would you come over to my apartment tonight?’’ or ‘‘Would you go to bed with me tonight?’’ Men and women were equally likely to consent to a date, but men were significantly more likely to agree to the apartment or casual sex offers. No female participant agreed to having casual sex.

The aggregated results are:

Cropped screenshot of table of results

Cumulative results of previous studies
Consent rate  Date          Apartment     Sex
Women         31% (44/144)  18% (34/186)    1% (2/178)
Men           37% (46/128)  57% (102/178)  58% (91/158)

Moreover, they created their own experiment:

In total, 281 subjects (119 female, 162 male) were approached in a medium sized town in the south-west of Germany (about 200,000 inhabitants) on a university campus or in student clubs. All subjects were approached between June and July 2013. On campus, subjects were approached on sunny weekdays between 10 am and 6 pm and in the night clubs between 10 pm and 4 am.

They obtained the following results:

Cropped screenshot of table of results

Consent rate by relationship status
Consent rate                   Campus                   Party
                               Date         Sex         Date         Sex
Not in a relationship (N=130)
 Women                         50% (7/14)    0% (0/10)  30% (4/12)    6% (1/15)
 Men                           73% (11/15)  36% (4/11)  96% (26/27)  65% (17/26)
In a relationship (N=137)
 Women                          5% (1/19)    0% (0/17)  26% (4/15)    0% (0/10)
 Men                            8% (2/26)    4% (1/25)  30% (4/12)   16% (2/12)
Total (N=267)
 Women                         24% (8/33)    0% (0/28)  30% (8/27)    4% (1/25)
 Men                           32% (13/41)  14% (5/36)  77% (30/39)  50% (19/38)

In an experiment based on pictures shown on a computer, the differences were significantly smaller (yet still with significantly more men interested in casual sex):

Subjects were seated in front of a laptop and had the opportunity to ask questions. The experimenter also explained to them that they could withdraw their consent to the experiment at any time. They then were presented with 10 pictures of people of the opposite sex in a random order. For each picture, they were asked how attractive they found the person and if they wanted to have a date or sex with them, respectively. During the testing, subjects were left alone in the room, with a researcher outside the door so subjects could ask questions any time. After finishing the testing, subjects completed a questionnaire. At that point subjects still believed they would meet the people they had chosen from the pictures.

Cropped screenshot of bar graph

In another study by Terri D. Conley, Perceived Proposer Personality Characteristics and Gender Differences in Acceptance of Casual Sex Offers (2011), summarized in Casual Sex: Are Men and Women So Different?, they considered an offer by their best friend, and in another - by a famous celebrity.

Conley (2011) conducted a second study that asked participants to consider whether or not they would accept a casual sex proposition from their best friend of the opposite sex. Initially, it appeared that women were less likely than men to accept such an offer. However, when controlling for perceived sexual capabilities of the partner, women accepted the propositions just as often as men.

In the celebrity context there is little difference (though, I admit it does not fit the "average man/woman" criterion from the original question):

Conley (2011) also tested whether women would be more willing to accept casual sex with an attractive celebrity than with an unattractive celebrity. Intriguingly, women were just as likely to say “yes” to Johnny Depp and “no” to Donald Trump as men were to say “yes” to Angelina Jolie and “no” to Roseanne Barr.

  • 3
    I wonder if the difference seen with the computer between them is the "safeness factor" as cited by the researchers, or if it's as simple as it being easier to say yes when the person isn't actually asking you to your face. Probably both if I had to guess, or that they're related.
    – Is Begot
    Commented Feb 20, 2019 at 19:50
  • 3
    @IsBegot For sure safety, though I am not persuaded that only safety (it is a very different condition of being asked in the wild vs seeing pictures and deciding whom they want to data/sex). Commented Feb 20, 2019 at 19:52

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .