6

There are multiple stories about the melting of ice at the North Pole, and I know enough about climate science to recognize the seriousness of the issue — my question is not about that. I've recently seen a couple stories that have this picture or similar: enter image description here

The caption on a very similar photo at ABC News reads:

A sign indicating North Pole is seen among melting ice in this undated file photo.

The word "undated" makes me a tad suspicious. Can anyone find a legitimate provenance for this photo? I'm cautious because it's a very shareable photo, but I don't want to share it if it's an exaggeration of the current state of affairs.

  • 1
    gettyimages.com/detail/photo/… – DavePhD Dec 25 '18 at 19:41
  • 1
    getty sales the image with and without the sign gettyimages.com/detail/photo/… – DavePhD Dec 25 '18 at 19:42
  • Thanks, @DavePhD, does Getty Images suggest that the picture has been sufficiently vetted? – Ben Hocking Dec 25 '18 at 19:43
  • 11
    There's no physical permanent marker at the north pole because it's all sea-ice which drifts around as new ice forms and old ice melts or shears off. I'm pretty sure this photo is just meant to be a visual metaphor than the literal truth. – GordonM Dec 25 '18 at 23:13
  • 1
    @GordonM the photographer, Marketa Jirouskova, went to the North Pole on the tourism nuclear icebreaker Yamal. – DavePhD Dec 26 '18 at 4:21
6

The icebreaker Yamal has been traveling to the North Pole since 1994, including tourist trips.

The photographer Marketa Jirouskova took such a trip to the North Pole.

The official caption of the photo is "Sign indicating North Pole for tourists, amongst melting ice, Arctic Ocean "

other related images are before sticking the sign on the spot and a different view of after

The only question is how much the icebreaker disturbed the ice in the photo.

For timewise comparison, this is an August 1958 video of waterskiing at the North Pole, when the USS Skate submarine surfaced in open water next to a scientific research group there: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqWSe6dOgO0

  • 1
    "The only question is how much the icebreaker disturbed the ice in the photo": I think there's another significant question, which is the distance of the location from the North Pole. The evidence presented here does not establish that. – phoog Dec 27 '18 at 20:19
  • @phoog what about the gps gettyimages.co.uk/detail/photo/… ? – DavePhD Dec 27 '18 at 20:43
  • Is there any evidence that the picture of the GPS was taken in the same place or at the same time as the picture of the sign? – phoog Dec 27 '18 at 20:45
  • @phoog no absolute proof, just that the photographer is the same. But look at this video m.youtube.com/watch?v=x1XMZTzELaE starting at about 3:25 for the same sign and how the Yamal places it when the tourists get to the North Pole. – DavePhD Dec 27 '18 at 21:08

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .