I found this image shared on Facebook [Warning: image contains a bleeding turtle.] with the following text:

Your Straws Did NOT Do This

[image of turtle with foreign body in nostril]

Americans are being told we must risk our health with expensive, awkward reusable or paper straws. All because of this suffering turtle.

But in real life, this turtle was found near Costa Rica, not the US. And Costa Rica dumps its trash directly into rivers and the ocean.

The US never does that. It's been banned by Federal law for 45 years. Discard your straw in a normal trash receptical (sic), and turtles are safe.

In Fact:

10 Asian and African Rivers Generate 90% of Plastic Trash in the Ocean

Americans create almost none of the ocean's plastic.

The World Economic Forum makes a similar claim:

By analyzing the waste found in the rivers and surrounding landscape, researchers were able to estimate that just 10 river systems carry 90% of the plastic that ends up in the ocean.

While I can imagine that third-world countries might not have well-established waste disposal processes, 90% sounds exaggerated.

  • 3
    Again, please take your political discussions to chat. – Oddthinking Sep 19 at 14:50
  • 3
    Worth noting - many of the [world's largest rivers] by length or dscahrge (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…) are in Africa or Asia. So even if one ignored any other misrepresentation and assumed a plastic output based solely on river size, the data would still show a skew towards these regions. – Jack Sep 20 at 12:55
  • 6
    I don't know the answer. But if the US sells plastic trash to, say, China, and this garbage ends up in the ocean. Who generated the trash? Was it US or China? – Ink blot Sep 20 at 15:05
  • 7
    I found this image shared on Facebook the claim is probably false, then. And those Einstein quotes? Same. – Tobia Tesan Sep 20 at 15:53
  • 2
    Found it interesting that the claim in the post, which seemed to be claiming to be debunking hyperbole included - "Americans are being told we must risk our health with expensive, awkward reusable or paper straws. All because of this suffering turtle." Good job in focusing in on a discreet and concrete claim in that passage that could be objectively examined. +1 – PoloHoleSet Sep 20 at 21:06
up vote 166 down vote accepted

No, rivers and other land-based sources account for 10-12%

From Wikipedia:

Sources of ocean-based plastic pollution

Almost 90% of plastic debris that pollutes ocean water, which translates to 5.6 million tons, comes from ocean-based sources. Merchant ships expel cargo, sewage, used medical equipment, and other types of waste that contain plastic into the ocean. Naval and research vessels eject waste and military equipment that are deemed unnecessary. Pleasure crafts release fishing gear and other types of waste, either accidentally or through negligent handling. The largest ocean-based source of plastic pollution is discarded fishing gear (including traps and nets), estimated to be up to 90% of plastic debris in some areas.[3]

Source: Plastics in the Marine Environment: The Dark Side of a Modern Gift

This 2012 review explains a much smaller percentage comes from land-based sources:

Approximately 0.8 million tons annually of marine debris, which is 12% of the total debris input into the oceans, originates from land-based sources, and primarily consists of discarded plastic items (user plastic). In highly populated areas, marine debris comes primarily from the land.

So what about that study?

The study — Export of Plastic Debris by Rivers into the Sea — says in its abstract (emphasis mine):

We analyzed a global compilation of data on plastic debris in the water column across a wide range of river sizes. Plastic debris loads, both microplastic (particles <5 mm) and macroplastic (particles >5 mm) are positively related to the mismanaged plastic waste (MMPW) generated in the river catchments. This relationship is nonlinear where large rivers with population-rich catchments delivering a disproportionately higher fraction of MMPW into the sea. The 10 top-ranked rivers transport 88–95% of the global load into the sea.

In other words: they did not examine the ocean, they examined rivers. And their number does not say that 88-95% of the plastic that has ended up in the ocean comes from these 10 rivers, but that of the Mismanaged Plastic Waste that rivers in particular contribute to the oceanic plastic pollution, these 10 rivers account for 88-95% of that contribution.

But(!) as the study above says, rivers and other land-based sources of oceanic plastic waste account for 10-12% of the total plastic waste in the ocean.

  • 11
    It's worth addressing the question asked by noting that while rivers aren't the only source of ocean plastic, the ten top ranked rivers you refer to ARE in Asia and Africa. Source: National Geographic June 2018 – Beanluc Sep 19 at 20:27
  • 2
    It's also possible that the claim was about 90% of the plastic coming from land into the ocean. Is this claim true? If so the article has merit as it is making a statement about recycling being needed to prevent landfills from spilling into the ocean, and therefore ocean sources aren't relevant to that discussion. – The Great Duck Sep 20 at 5:39
  • 3
    @MichaelK so if I reduce the amount of plastic I use, it doesn't reduce plastic in the ocean but it does reduce the amount of plastic that gets incinerated. (because western countries are pretty good in not letting their garbage end up in rivers) – Pieter B Sep 20 at 14:02
  • 6
    @BlackJack you want people to change behavior because of....reasons....plastic soup is the big hype at the moment. The burden is on you to prove the my behavior is causing this plastic soup. And that proof is simply not there. – Pieter B Sep 20 at 18:26
  • 4
    Interesting: it looks like this is an unusual case where - at least taking this answer at face value - the factual claim that the question is about is technically false, but the political argument that the claim was being used to support is actually supported more strongly by the truth than by the false claim. – Mark Amery Sep 21 at 12:11

If the question is about those specific countries:

No, plastic in those rivers can have come from a different country.

..Therefore, the rivers might be Asian/African, the plastic is not (therefore, the responsibility of it being recycled does not fall solely on those countries).

MichaelK's answer is excellent. I would just like to add the fact that there are a few articles around stating that 'developed' countries are even exporting recycled, plastic and other such to other less developed ones (basically pay other countries to accept it). So the stats a study might have become even more obscured.

A few come around with a simple google search:

The Independent: UK now exporting more waste to countries with highest levels of ocean plastic pollution

Not about plastic so much, but e-waste article from Greenpeace: Where does e-waste end up?

More here:

The BBC: Reality Check: How much plastic do we send to China?

The New York Times: Your Recycling Gets Recycled, Right? Maybe, or Maybe Not

From the starting paragraph of wikipedia on the subject:

'Toxic or hazardous wastes are often exported from developed countries to developing countries, also known as countries of the Global South. Therefore, the burden of the toxicity of wastes from Western countries falls predominantly onto developing countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.Global waste trade[1]'

Further, it is suggested that the 'recycled' plastic which is exported, often ends up in a state which is no longer recycle-able.

Extract from 5gyres:

'In countries like India, waste pickers sort through the trash to find the pieces that are most valuable—thicker plastics and metals. The remainder becomes landfilled or incinerated, creating a health crisis for communities. Local waterways act like conveyor belts, sending plastic straight out to sea.' Think you're doing your part by recycling?.

P.S. This is my first attempt at a (complimentary) answer. I don't have enough reputation to move this to a (very long) comment, and if there's something i did wrong please let me know. Thanks ;)

  • 17
    If you're suggesting that the plastic entering the ocean from African and Asian rivers got into their rivers due to European and American plastic being shipped there first for recycling, firstly that's simply horrifying and secondly does nothing whatsoever to absolve those countries from letting those plastics enter their rivers. The same applies if what you're suggesting is that the plastic was manufactured in Europe and the Americas and shipped to Asia and Africa for consumption rather than for recycling. Either way, again, does nothing to ease responsibility. – Beanluc Sep 19 at 20:32
  • 3
    Please note that which direction an answer lies relative to your own depends on the settings selected by the user viewing your question. When you say "above", the answer you refer to may in fact be below. Even if an answer were above yours on every criterion now, it may not be later. Even if it were to remain above yours on every criterion, other answers may be added after yours and end up above yours on some criteria, leaving ambiguity about which answer you are referring to. Generally it is best not to use "above" or "below" to refer to other answers. – Glen_b Sep 20 at 2:59
  • 1
    To expand @Glen_b's comment: What you should do instead is to link to the referenced answer e.g. like "Marina M's answer can be improved by links to the answers she is referring to." The link will surive a name change of the user posting the answer and stay valid and unambiguous as long as the answer exists. – Nobody Sep 20 at 8:16
  • 4
    @ Glen_b & Nobody: Thanks for the suggestions, ill edit my answer. @ Beanluc: I was suggesting that rubbish to be recycled is shipped to those countries. In my mind there are mitigating circumstances for those countries, though blame is not alleviated. However for the developed countries, they still have their fair share of blame, since it's cheaper (than recycle it themselves) for them to export it and not care what happens to it afterwards, then reap the benefits of a 'green' country. Poorer countries are so poor they are being paid to dump it, basically, though ofcourse still horrible imo. – Marina M Sep 20 at 10:31
  • Continents are not countries. Talking about countries is a red herring. This is like blaming an ax manufacturer for the actions of an ax murderer. – Chloe Sep 21 at 14:47

America generates 50% of the world's plastic trash. When China banned recycling for foreign countries earlier this year, trash started piling up all over ports in the United States. It was deemed as a crisis in many states.

Wall Street Journal and many other outlets did a pretty extensive coverage on this issue, and there are some very good video documentaries too.

  1. https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-recycling-companies-face-upheaval-from-china-scrap-ban-1533231057?mod=e2tw
  2. https://www.ecowatch.com/plastic-waste-crisis-recycling-2597495368.html
  3. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-hongkong-paperrecycling/china-ban-on-waste-imports-leads-to-piles-of-paper-abroad-surging-prices-in-china-idUSKCN1C30GR
  • 7
    Welcome to Skeptics.SE! The question is asking specifically about plastic waste that enters the ocean, your sources seem to be talking about plastic waste in general. – F1Krazy Sep 20 at 21:21

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .