Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
A while ago, someone studying a health related subject (not necessarily medicine, but I forgot) claimed that "real" allergies could only be caused by protein-like substances.
I was told this after I claimed I was allergic to kiwi fruit, which I then was told wasn't possible.
Are there in medicine some subtle definitions that differentiate between allergies in that narrow sense, and, maybe, "intolerances" of a broader sense?
Allergies have a specific definition, they are abnormal reactions of the immune system to harmless substances. Intolerances (e.g. lactose intolerance) usually don't involve the immune system.
Something to keep in mind: Doctors have a different definition of "allergy" than laypeople generally have. In medical-speak "allergy" refers only to to the immune system going after something harmless. In lay-speak, "allergy" generally refers to an adverse reaction to something harmless and where another identified mechanism (ie, lactose intolerance) doesn't explain it.
Nickel allergy is one of the most common causes of allergic contact dermatitis.
[...]
If you have nickel allergy, your body
reacts to nickel and possibly to other
metals, such as cobalt and palladium.
In other words, it's mistakenly
identified nickel as something that
could harm you. Once your body has
developed a reaction to a particular
agent (allergen) — in this case,
nickel — your immune system will
always be sensitive to it. That means
anytime you come into contact with
nickel, your immune system will
respond and produce an allergic
response.1
Nickel allergy is one of the most
common causes of contact allergic
dermatitis. In affected individuals,
dermatitis (eczema) develops in places
where nickel-containing metal is
touching the skin. The most common
sites are the earlobes (from
earrings), the wrists (from a watch
strap) and the lower abdomen (from a
jeans stud); the affected areas become
intensely itchy and may become red and
blistered (acute dermatitis) or dry,
thickened and pigmented (chronic
dermatitis).2
My brother has a severe allergy to codeine, which is also most certainly not a protein-like substance. Most drug allergies would also fall into this category.
That's correct. The confusion around this idea is that the antibodies that are made in response to an allergen challenge are themselves proteins. Very often the allergen itself isn't a protein. I chose nickel as it is as inorganic, non-protein-like as possible.
– user2466
CommentedJun 3, 2011 at 5:51
one could hold that the allergy is to the anti-bodies, which are produced erroneously in response to contact with an otherwise harmless substance, ergo a protein. But that'd be severely stretching the definition in order to support a bogus argument :)
A "true" allergy is a Type 1 IgE mediated hypersensitivity in which antibodies recognize specific antigens. Antibodies are created when an interplay between T cells and B cells occurs, notably the presentation of a protein on a Major HistoCompatability (MHC) complex, which induces the creation and release of antibodies that the target that protein. As MHC complexes only recognize proteins, a "true" allergy ONLY can happen with a protein. However, fruit has protein in it as well, as do most food items other than pure sugar or pure fat, so it is not impossible. I have many children in my clinic allergic to kiwi. However you could not be allergic to pure table sugar or pure salt, for the reason above (however pure substances dont generally exist outside of the lab and there is almost always some plant matter contaminant)
Nickle "allergy" is a delayed type 4 cell mediated hypersensitivity, in which the nickle ions act as a hapten. A hapten is a molecule that combines with a protein to form larger allergenic molecule. The ion binds with a protein and that protein is recognized by dendritic cells in the skin that cause an allergic type reaction. So it IS a protein that is being recognized, but a different type of mechanism and really not what we mean when we say a "true allergy".
Thus "true" allergies, type 1 hypersensitivities, are caused by only proteins which are omnipresent, but even exposure to non proteins can cause allergic type reactions when they combine with the bodies own proteins to form an allergenic molecule.
Assuming this is true - and I don't have the knowledge to tell - it's most of an excellent answer. What it needs is references, which are required here. If you can put in a reference to different sorts of hypersenstivities, including something about nickel being a type 4 and type 1 being "true", that would make it much better.
This answer is correct that type 1 hypersensitivity is what we generally think of as a "true" allergy, i.e., one that can lead to anaphylaxis, but incorrect that it requires IgE cross linking. It requires mast cell degranulation, which is typically mediated by IgE, but can occur with IgE independent release. An additional technical point: antibodies do recognize non protein antigens (sugars, lipids, nucleic acids). T cell receptors don't. So you don't get T-cell help (no class switching or affinity maturation).