When Pakistan's former PM Nawaz Sharif was declared incompetent to carry on as a PM because of telling lies and doing corruptions, he indirectly accused Pakistan Military and Judiciary's nexus behind his removal.

I have two questions in this regard:

  1. Is Military-Judiciary nexus behind the deposition of former PM Nawaz Sharif?
  2. How does that work?
  • We require notable sources that claimed that those two claims you posted were true. Please edit them in or it's likely that your question will be deleted.
    – DenisS
    May 30, 2018 at 20:30
  • 2
    Even in the best of circumstances this would devolve into a he said/she said thing, and absent any credible sources it's just a shouting match. May 30, 2018 at 20:58
  • Well, we have a notable claim or two at least...
    – Ben Barden
    May 31, 2018 at 15:47
  • In 1993 Prime Minster Sharif was forced out by the military, in 1999 he was deposed in a military coup and convicted in a military court, and in 2017 he was disqualified as Prime Minster by the civilian courts for failing to disclose in his nomination papers his employment by a Dubai-based company after the Army Chief had called for full accountability for revelations in the Panama Papers. The Pakistan courts have been more friendly to military leaders than to elected representatives since coups starting in the 1950s
    – Henry
    Jun 1, 2018 at 15:46
  • @Henry, can you present any reference citation in favor of your comment as this is not an opinion-based website.
    – user42178
    Jun 4, 2018 at 13:38


You must log in to answer this question.