Found this on Pol.SE:

The US relies on its higher income residents for an exceptionally large amount of its revenue. Almost half of the population pays no federal income taxes at all. The top % pay about a fifth of the overall taxes. ... The US is heavily reliant on its richest citizens to support the tax burden. If it reduced that, then it would have to do one or more of increase middle class taxes, reduce spending, or increase borrowing.

The answer links to https://taxfoundation.org/summary-latest-federal-income-tax-data-2016-update/ which provides some confirming(?) data points.

I would like to specifically ask whether it can be legitimately said that the US is heavily reliant on its richest citizens to support the tax burden?

closed as primarily opinion-based by Sklivvz Mar 20 '18 at 22:13

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 2
    This seems to already have an answer here. By that answer, the top 1% pay around 36% of the federal income taxes... – T. Sar Mar 20 '18 at 20:03
  • @T.Sar - That question specifically asks for a single data point, while I was asking about the broader statement "support the tax burden". It may be that my question is too broad. I'll let the experts here decide. – Martin Mar 20 '18 at 20:09
  • 3
    @DocM the US does not have a VAT, and the federal government does not collect sales tax. Last I checked ~90% of the US revenue comes from income (corporate and personal) and payroll taxes, so I think it’s fair to focus there. (Of course a complete answer would provide that justification). – Steve Cox Mar 20 '18 at 21:12
  • 2
    whether something is "heavily reliant" on something else is not an objective measure. If the top 10% richest citizens pay 15% of takes (random numbers) are they "heavily reliant"? It's a matter of opinions and expectations – Sklivvz Mar 20 '18 at 22:14
  • 4
    Its worth noting that this entire premise is a red herring. The top 20% own 80%+ of assets. The top 1% alone own 40% of assets. This entire argument from organizations that make these claims is that they should pay less taxes because their ownership of absurd amounts of stuff makes them pay a lot of taxes. When all of the wealth is centralized in the hands of a few, who else is supposed to pay for stuff? – Tal Mar 27 '18 at 16:17

Browse other questions tagged .