12

There is a general claim being made that 2016 has had an unusually high number of celebrities pass away.

Facebook image

While the past few days may have had a cluster of celebrity deaths, is 2016 really an unusual year?

I realize there are some subjective elements in this question, but I am asking it because I have actually seen some reports and even Snopes on this, so I figured it's appropriate.

  • 3
    A related [closed] question from April, that stumbled because we couldn't agree on a formulation that didn't invole curses: skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/32616/… – Oddthinking Dec 29 '16 at 4:29
  • 2
    @Oddthinking also because we can only speculate about the rest of 2016 in April 2016. On Dec 29th, we can safely assume we've all the data we need to draw a fact based conclusion. – Sklivvz Dec 29 '16 at 11:16
10

First and foremost, Snopes gives this a look as of 27 DEC 16, and basically concludes that 2016 isn't really all that unusual from any other year. (emphasis mine)

Of course, attempting to quantify such a feeling involves several basic issues. Primarily, what makes a person a celebrity? Whose deaths are considered notable? For instance, the Los Angeles Times listed 91 "leaders, stars and other notable figures who died in 2016," while CBS News charted more than 150. So what standard(s) do we use?

Since there's no official body that determines the relative fame and importance of individuals, we'll examine this question by reviewing the "notable death" lists published by a variety of news outlets between 2013 and 2016:

While a large number of celebrities certainly passed away in 2016, the number wasn't unusually high when compared to those of recent years. The Hollywood Reporter, Legacy.com, and The Telegraph all counted more celebrity deaths in 2016 than in the previous three years, but this year ranked second, third, or even fourth among that group according to other news outlets.

In addition to Snopes, the BBC also tackled this but based on what they call "pre-prepared obituaries".

now that December has arrived, it seems an appropriate time to ask - has 2016 continued to be so dangerous and fateful for famous people?

In actual fact, Serpell says, it hasn't.

"The last six months of this year were broadly in line with the previous last six months of the previous four or five years," Serpell says.

"So we didn't see that spike continuing throughout the 12 months."

And I thought I would add in commentary from Greg Laden (a science blogger):

According to TV Guide, 2016 is not a very big year for celebrity deaths at all.

I think 2016 was not an exceptional year for celebrity deaths, in terms of numbers. The same number as usual died, this was not a record year.

But, the particular celebrities that did die included a disproportionate number of people that those who inhabit Facebook and Twitter, or perhaps, who simply exist in the modern Western world, were attached to.

You must log in to answer this question.

protected by Sklivvz Dec 29 '16 at 11:18

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .