A website selling Himalayan Salt advertises:

As a trace mineral, arsenic is a necessary part of healthy blood. Small amounts of arsenic are essential to life.

Is this claim true?

  • I've heard this claim before from a university Health educator. (Note: She was a little on the paranoid side, and not an expert on the topic.) Commented May 12, 2016 at 18:59
  • Dartmouth Toxic Metals makes the claim that it is beneficial in some birds and mammals, with humans being controversial, but sadly no additional links to proper studies (links tend to focus on acute arsenic poisoning).
    – Jimmy M.
    Commented May 12, 2016 at 19:21
  • 1
    Given that the WHO recommend 10 μg/litre (or 10 billion parts per litre) as a limit for Arsenic in groundwater, you probably don't want to supplement it into your diet...
    – user2276
    Commented May 13, 2016 at 5:04
  • Not sure how this question could be answered if this is not true. You could say that there are no known processes in the body that use As, I suppose.(Also : "On the other hand, arsenic the chemical formulated in a lab is highly toxic and even deadly in large doses." gah)
    – gilleain
    Commented May 13, 2016 at 7:47
  • I don't know about it being necessary for health or essential to life. I do know that it generally is prevalent (in trace amounts, at least) in the human body.
    – voices
    Commented May 13, 2016 at 12:32

1 Answer 1


It is currently not known if arsenic is essential for humans, but it might be required for the metabolism of the amino acid methionine:

A toxic brew we cannot live without. Micronutrients give insights into the interplay between geochemistry and evolutionary biology (EMBO Reports, 2008)

Even arsenic, the poison of choice for many fictional murderers, is now close to qualifying as a micronutrient in animals. It seems that arsenic has a role in the metabolism of the amino acid methionine and in gene silencing (Uthus, 2003). Other work suggests that it has a positive interaction with the more important micronutrient selenium (Zeng et al, 2005).

In fact, if arsenic is essential for humans, its recommended daily intake would be little different from selenium, which is so important that evolution incorporated it into the rare amino acid selenocysteine—the crucial component of the antioxidizing selenoproteins that help to repair other proteins from oxidative damage. The recommended dose of selenium is 40 μg per day, whereas extrapolations from mammalian studies suggest that humans might need between 12.5 μg and 25 μg of arsenic. This is, to some extent, academic; a normal diet will contain 12–50 μg of arsenic in most parts of the world, but it shows that arsenic—the famous poison—and selenium—one of the most widely studied elements in the dietary context—could well have almost identical levels of nutritional necessity and toxicity.

Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc (National Academic Press, 2001):

Dairy products can contribute as much as 31 percent of arsenic in the diet; meat, poultry, fish, grains and cereal products collectively contribute approximately 56 percent (Mahaffey et al., 1975).

So, arsenic is present in common foods in sufficient amounts.

According to this source, Himalayan salt contains <0.02 ppm (<0.02 μg/g or 0.1 μg/5 g) arsenic, which is an insignificant amount if the estimated requirement is 12.5-25 μg/day.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .