30

The History Channel documentary series Declassified episode Tiananmen Square features this quote:

The Chinese government billed the families of the protesters for the cost of the bullets used to kill their loved ones. -Ding Zilin, Independent Federation of Chinese Students and Scholars in the U.S.

Is there any known record of the families being invoiced for either:

  • the costs associated with breaking up the protests; or
  • a 'Bullet Fee' for the return of the body similar to those applied to executions?
13

Due to the difficulty of performing research on this topic, all the sources cited in this answer derive from anti-government sources, as the extent of censorship in China makes it very difficult, if not impossible, to obtain information from official sources.

While it is impossible to prove that nobody executed during the 1989 Tiananmen protests had bullet fees charged to their relatives, it is unlikely that any such cases existed in a verifiable manner, due to there being no mention of incidents in 1989 from multiple anti-governmental secondary sources. If such a case existed, it would reasonably be widely communicated as another example of governmental brutality.

That being said, however, the bullet fee practices of the Chinese government have been well documented by various sources, most cases of which occurred during the Cultural Revolution period.

For example, this article from the Hong Kong based Epoch Times cites a number of cases where a bullet fee was charged to relatives, none of which occurred in the vicinity of the 1989 protests. The tone of this article clearly shows that the writer is anti-government, and therefore is unlikely to omit cases of bullet fees being charged during the 1989 protests that were known to him.

古今中外,但凡處決犯人,火刑未收過柴火費,電刑未收過電費,毒殺未收過藥費或氣費,斬首、絞刑也沒聽說過有刀具或繩索費──中共黨文化孕育的怪胎層出不窮,子彈費橫空出世,為泯滅人性的黨文化增添了厚重的一筆。遨遊太空的21世紀,中共還在肆無忌憚地踐踏人權和摧殘人性,後世的人們一定會歎為觀止。

Since antiquity, during the execution of criminals, no log fee was charged for burning, no electricity fee was charged for the electric chair, no gas or poison fee charged for lethal injections and gassings, nor were knife or rope fees charged for beheading and hanging. The monstrous logic birthed from Chinese Communist Party (CCP)'s culture resulted in the absurd creation of the bullet fee, adding another line to the inhumanity of the CCP's culture. In the 21st century space age, the CCP still violates human rights with impunity. This would certainly be viewed with horror by people from the future.

The article then goes on to cite a number of cases where a bullet fee was charged:

1967 March 23 ,劉文輝 (Liu Wen Hui) was executed in Shanghai for being a counter-revolutionary, and his family was charged a bullet fee of 40 cents.

1968 April 29, 林昭 (Lin Zhao) was executed in Shanghai and her family was charged a bullet fee of 5 cents.

1970 March 5, 遇羅克 (Yu Luo Ke) was executed for being a counter-revolutionary, his parents were charged a bullet fee of 13 cents. The bullet fee was not charged because his cornea was sold in a corneal transplant operation.

1975 April 4, 張志新 (Zhang Zhi Xin) was executed by exsanguination and shooting. His family was charged a bullet fee of 10 cents.

2006 November 28, 陳滔 (Chen Tao) was executed for rioting and killing a policeman. His family was charged a bullet fee of 50 RMB.

None of these cases occurred near the time period cited. Therefore, while I cannot show conclusively what the Chinese government's bullet fee policy was during the 1989 protests, there are records of them charging a bullet fee for execution by firing squad before and after that period.

  • Just to be clear, the tone of your article sounds like you don't think that the writer you're quoting is necessarily accurate. Instead, you're arguing that if bullet fees were in fact charged, then at the least, such a biased writer would mention them, correct? – Kevin - Reinstate Monica Jun 12 '15 at 22:07
  • 1
    @Kevin Yes, that is what I am trying to say. This is clearly a biased source, which is more likely than not to mention a bullet fee if that was made known to him. – March Ho Jun 12 '15 at 22:08
  • 3
    Could it be perhaps because the Chinese government tries to deny Tiananmen Square at all? AFAIK the official policy is nothing happened there on that day, and a bill could be used as evidence by a victim's family. (I don't know if the denial policy was in effect even back then, but this article mentions "The information blackout has been enforced so effectively for 20 years that most young Chinese are completely unaware of this major event.") – zovits supports GoFundMonica Jun 17 '15 at 9:38

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .