10

There are so many articles in the internet that say going out during a solar eclipse causes harm to pregnant women. Is this claim true? Why did this myth come in the first place?

This is from a BBC article.

One has it that if a pregnant woman goes out during an eclipse, her baby will be born blind or with a cleft lip.

Another says that a pregnant woman should not touch her belly during a lunar eclipse, or she will cause the baby to be born with a birthmark.

I am thinking in the lines of "what made people come up with these ideas in the first place?"

  • 2
    Can you link to at least one article that makes such a claim? – fred Apr 26 '11 at 13:21
  • 3
    A solar eclipse will cause harm to anyone who stares directly at it while it's not yet a complete eclipse. – Kyralessa Apr 26 '11 at 13:26
  • 3
    To me this seems to be a kind of "is Friday 13 really unlucky day"? People believe all kinds of silly things. – Suma Apr 26 '11 at 13:47
  • 2
    I don't know where people get these stupid ideas from, I personally ignore all this superstitious mumbo jumbo. Right now to walk home, must make sure I don't step on any crack in the pavement though or i'll have bad luck for the rest of the week ;) – Ardesco Apr 26 '11 at 14:37
  • Absolutely, yes. The danger of an eclipse is that people may stare at the sun, which can cause permanent damage to the retina. Being pregnant does not protect a woman from eye damage. – philosodad May 21 '12 at 20:41
15

I think Brian made a strong enough argument (albeit without references) that these superstitions are likely bogus, so I am going to focus on their origins.

Edit (over a year after I first wrote this answer): Brian's answer that I referenced above has since been deleted. In retrospect (thanks to Sklivvz digging it up from the archives), that other answer turned out to not have any properly referenced statements and was generally hand-wavy. The gist of the argument was that since many women go out in public these days while pregnant, there is likely a significant number of women who are inadvertently exposed to eclipses, yet despite this we don't see a very high rate of birth defects. The other answer was here before mine, so I probably just referenced it out of courtesy ;-)


It seems like at least some of these beliefs are rooted in traditional Mexican medicine. That article is in Spanish (and I don't have access to the full copy), but here is a translation of a portion of the abstract:

An analysis of the logic of one of the commonest health beliefs in rural areas of Mexico is made, taking as a starting point testimonies collected in the area of Ocuituco, in the state of Morelos. This belief suggests that a pregnant woman is in danger of having a harelipped baby during a solar eclipse. The interrelation of these beliefs with other traditional elements (such as the "loss of the shadow" and the "hot-cold theory") is discussed. Also, some of the already existing interpretations of this belief which seek to link the "loss of the shadow" with the solar eclipse belief are reviewed. Finally, an alternative interpretation of this belief is made from a structuralist methodological perspective. This interpretation is grounded in the Nahuatl myth on the creation of the sun and the moon, and in an analysis of the nature of rabbits in the Nahuatl culture, according to historic secondary sources. It is suggested that the belief about the danger of a solar eclipse must be interpreted in connection to the "hot-cold theory", but not to the "loss of the shadow".

"Loss of the shadow", or "la pérdida de la sombra" is a traditional belief that one's "shadow" (symbolizing the soul) can be separated from one's body. Hispanic "hot-cold theory" is based on the belief that some diseases/ailments are "hot" and others are "cold" in nature. Therefore, to summarize, this article is claiming that the avoidance of the eclipse among pregnant women was perhaps precipitated by a belief that it could strip one of one's soul and/or that its "hot" or "coldness" could instigate a disease.

The avoidance of eclipses among pregnant women is also apparently a custom in India, too. This study by Jain examined a medical center in India which had a higher-than-average rate of children born with missing limbs. The study was unable to conclude any correlation between the environment and the high rate of birth defects, however, it did note that

An interesting finding was a history of exposure of expectant mother to the eclipse during pregnancy in 19 cases [out of 200]. Though no documentary evidence exists to correlate it with the deficiency in the literature, still many parents believe this to be the cause of limb deficiency in the new born.

  • Brian's answer was deleted, would you mind integrating the gist of his arguments into your answer? – Alain May 22 '12 at 14:24
  • 1
    @Alain: I wrote this answer over a year ago, so I don't really remember what Brian wrote. Perhaps moderators or people with more reputation than I are able to see deleted posts? I'll flag this question for moderator attention to see if they can get the content. – ESultanik May 22 '12 at 17:01
  • 2
    @ESultanik, I suggest that you simply remove the reference to Brian's answer. It was really poor! I'll poke you in chat with a copy of it. – Sklivvz May 22 '12 at 20:10
  • @Sklivvz, thanks! I redacted the reference and put in a clarification. – ESultanik May 23 '12 at 13:18

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .