The Supreme Council of the Allied Principal War Powers recognized the Jewish People as the owners of the political rights to Palestine, but put them in trust for World Jewry until they attained a population majority. They had adopted the British Balfour Policy word for word and that was the intent of the Balfour Declaration. SSRN.com/abstract=5304 SSRN.com/abstract=4738

Article 2 of the Geneva Convention says the Convention doesn't apply to occupation of territory when the occupier is the owner of it and has the right to the exercise of sovereignty over it.

See also 4th Hague Convention (1907) Article 43 which assumes that for a belligerent occupation that is subject to its rules, a displaced sovereign must be involved. Here the Jewish People had the political rights to the territory that they gained in 1920 not by conquest in an aggressive war. A better characterization of the status of Palestine west of the Jordan than "occupied" is "liberated" because in 1967 the Jewish People regained control over the land over which it had attained legal dominion as of May 15, 1948.

closed as off-topic by Sklivvz Jul 25 '14 at 13:38

  • This question does not appear to be about scientific skepticism within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • Try politics.SE for this. – Bobson Jul 25 '14 at 13:21
  • 2
    By "Canon Law", do you mean the law of the Roman Catholic Church? If Yes, then how is that relevant? If No, then what do you mean? – TRiG Jul 28 '14 at 19:05

Browse other questions tagged .