4

This is a rumor I've heard amongst reptile keepers. Both organizations are openly opposed to keeping reptiles as pets. These reptile keepers claim they are against all pets, but know that going against keeping dogs and cats as pets would be a suicide mission.

Is there any evidence to support these rumors?

closed as primarily opinion-based by rjzii, Flimzy, matt_black, Sklivvz May 3 '14 at 16:56

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 2
    This question appears to be off-topic because it is about motive and secret believes. – SIMEL Apr 24 '14 at 20:40
  • 2
    IIRC PETA is even opposed to guide dogs, not just pets. – Andrew Grimm Apr 25 '14 at 3:56
6

Here a link describing a the background of the controversy.

http://www.cornutopia.com/Corn%20Utopia%20on%20the%20Web/-%20LURKING%20ENEMY%20Cornutopia%20corn%20snakes%20cornsnakes.htm

As Nate points out PETA believes that it would be better that pets had never existed, since they believe pet-owning is selfish and causes pain and suffering for the animals. But they also say that it is a myth they are trying to "free all the pets."

Contrary to myth, PETA does not want to confiscate animals who are well cared for and “set them free.” What we want is for the population of dogs and cats to be reduced through spaying and neutering and for people to adopt animals (preferably two so that they can keep each other company when their human companions aren’t home) from pounds or animal shelters—never from pet shops or breeders—thereby reducing suffering in the world.

Read more: http://www.peta.org/about-peta/why-peta/pets/#ixzz2zqRx25O0

Domesticated pets that were freed would be more likely to be injured and get sick, so it is a "least-worst" option. They have many campaigns targeting improving the lives of pets. I believe that since snakes are wild animals, they see a difference.

The Humane Society of the US does not seem to have a secret anti-pet agenda. The issue is that they are running a manipulative pro-pet fundraising campaign, when the national organization hasn't run a pound since the 1970s, and its funneling all but 1% of the funds to other lobbying efforts. They also have close ties to PETA, who while not fond of pets in theory, are not seeking to abolish the institution. http://www.humanewatch.org/the_humane_society_of_the_united_states_and_pet_shelter_giving/

4

In the case of PETA, there is no secret about it. On their web site, they say:

...we believe that it would have been in the animals’ best interests if the institution of “pet keeping”—i.e., breeding animals to be kept and regarded as “pets”—never existed.

Source: http://www.peta.org/about-peta/why-peta/pets/

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .