The Daily Telegraph claimed that "High-protein diet 'as bad for health as smoking'":

The risk is nearly as high as the danger of developing cancer by smoking 20 cigarettes each day. [...] They recommend consuming about 0.8g (0.03oz) of protein per kilogram of body weight every day in middle age.

  • 3
    The meat part seems to be a duplicate of this: skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/7188/… But the daily telegraph mentions protein. I have not seen this claim before. Maybe you could change your question to "Does a high protein diet increase your risk for cancer?" or something similar. Commented Mar 5, 2014 at 13:30

4 Answers 4


There is an article on NHS Choices about The Daily Telegraph's headline.

I have quoted the opening paragraphs below (emphasis mine):

We have decades of very good evidence that smoking kills and – fortunately for meat lovers – this latest unhelpful comparison with high protein diets largely appears to be a triumph of PR spin.

The warning was raised in a press release about a large study which found that for people aged 50-65, eating a lot of protein was associated with an increased risk of dying.

However, the study, which assessed the diets of Americans in a single 24-hour period (rather than long-term), found in those aged over 65 that a high protein diet was actually associated with a reduced risk of death from any cause or from cancer. These differing findings meant that overall there was no increase in risk of death, or from dying of cancer with a high protein diet.

And, in those aged over 65, a high protein diet was actually associated with a reduced risk of death from any cause or from cancer.

There are several reasons to be cautious when interpreting the results of this study, including that the researchers did not take into account important factors such as physical activity in their study.

The claim in much of the media, that a high protein diet in middle-aged people is “as dangerous as smoking” is unsupported.

We need to eat protein, we do not need to smoke.


A blog post by Zoë Harcombe details a long list of problems with the conclusions of this study. She doesn't raise any problems with the methodology of the study, just the conclusions that have been drawn from it.

Specifically to answer your question, no protein does not increase the risk of cancer. The study only claims that it does within a certain age group and within the other age group, it is actually associated with a lower risk of cancer.

Many conclusions can be drawn from the study but only the ones that make animal protein sound bad actually were, which is suspicious:

This is a direct quotation from the article (my emphasis): “Using Cox Proportional Hazard models, we found that high and moderate protein consumption were positively associated with diabetes-related mortality, but not associated with all-cause, CVD [cardiovascular], or cancer mortality when subjects at all the ages above 50 were considered.”

i.e. when we looked at the 6,381 over 50 year olds there was not even an association with protein intake and all-cause mortality, or CVD mortality, or cancer mortality.

There was a relationship with diabetes mortality and protein intake, but the numbers were so tiny (one death from diabetes in one group) that this was not considered important.

And that could have been the headline – “There is no association between protein intake and mortality” – but then there would be no headline.

The results showed that high protein diets are associated with higher life expectancy in over-65s. This means that low protein diets must be associated with lower life expectancy since the average over the entire data set was no association:

Sure enough, the 3,342 people over the age of 65 were far less likely to die from any cause if they were in the moderate or high protein intake group. Cancer mortality for the low protein group was two and a half times the cancer mortality for the high protein group.

The fact that the headlines chose to claim “protein will kill you in middle age” rather than “protein will save you in old age” just highlights the nonsense and bias.

There's also a conflict of interest. The author of the study sells a product that can solve the problems raised by the study:

The study claims to have adjusted for protein in general vs. animal protein to conclude that animal protein is the harmful factor and not protein per se. Call me suspicious, but I always check for conflicts of interest and the lead researcher, Dr Longo, has declared interests in (actually, he’s the founder of) L-Nutra – a company that makes ProLon™ – an entirely plant based meal replacement product.

A comment on the post mentions that three other authors of the study also work for L-Nutra.

The study doesn't have any comparison to smoking but the press release from the lead author of the study does.

That chicken wing you’re eating could be as deadly as a cigarette.


a mortality risk factor comparable to smoking.

It's difficult to determine exactly what this means. It could mean that one chicken wing is the equivalent of one cigarette, meaning that the Daily Telegraph's claim would suggest that a high protein diet means eating 20 chicken wings every day.


According to Health effects of protein intake in healthy adults: a systematic literature review (Food and Nutrition Research, 2013), the evidence about the association between protein intake and cancer is "inconclusive."

According to two large cohort studies in JAMA Internal Medicine, 2016, neither animal nor plant protein intake is associated with cancer mortality.


Some high-protein diets include foods such as red meat and full-fat dairy products, which may increase your risk of heart disease according to a Mayo Clinic dietician:

For most healthy people, a high-protein diet generally isn't harmful, particularly when followed for a short time. [...] However, the risks of using a high-protein diet with carbohydrate restriction for the long term are still being studied. Several health problems may result if a high-protein diet is followed for an extended time:

Some high-protein diets restrict carbohydrate intake so much that they can result in nutritional deficiencies or insufficient fiber, which can cause problems such as bad breath, headache and constipation. Some high-protein diets include foods such as red meat and full-fat dairy products, which may increase your risk of heart disease. A high-protein diet may worsen kidney function in people with kidney disease because your body may have trouble eliminating all the waste products of protein metabolism.

  • 1
    Additional references needed. Commented Sep 30, 2019 at 12:03

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .