This question already has an answer here:
While a nuclear war will obviously cause significant environmental harm to the earth, after doing some research on the subject I'm starting to find facts that make me question whether it would actually be a doomsday scenario like the media depicts it. For example I have found out that since 1945 over 2,000 nuclear weapons have been detonated.http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-07/6/japanese-artist-nuclear-weapons I have also found out that the a lot of the fallout in the Bikini Atoll disappeared from the soil because all the coconut trees absorbed it and deposited in it's coconuts. (Which they obviously made a warning not to eat the coconuts there) http://www.bikiniatoll.com/history.html Also the fact that Carl Sagan claimed that the environmental effects of Iraq burning all their oil reserves during the Iraq Kuwait war would have effects worse than nuclear winter makes me the magnitude of danger from nuclear winter is exaggerated. Obviously a nuclear winter is not something we want to happen and would obviously cause severe harm to the environment, but is it really an end of the world scenario like the media tends to depict it? Or is it just an environmental disaster that will require a lot of cleanup but can be recovered from?