10

This question already has an answer here:

One of my friend told me about this site. It gives many proofs related to the catastrophic event. The use of Nano-thermite strongly suggests that the buildings were imploded.
Although I do not trust these kinda sites, but presence of a conspiracy can't be completely rejected. Was it really pre-planned by USA itself?

Related questions:

marked as duplicate by Oddthinking Jan 8 '14 at 23:50

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • I'm hating myself for voting to reopen, but "Was it a false-flag operation?" is not a duplicate of "Was this a controlled implosion?" (OTOH, "was it false-flag?" may be un-falsifiable.) – Larry OBrien Jan 9 '14 at 0:34
  • @LarryOBrien: Fair point - there are several claims here, and I have added related questions to demonstrate we have covered each of them - who was responsible, the idea of prior knowledge, the idea the buildings were imploded. – Oddthinking Jan 9 '14 at 1:51
  • 3
    "presence of a conspiracy can't be completely rejected" - well, often it can ("That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence." - Christopher Hitchens,) but in the case of 9-11, it cannot. The evidence points directly towards a horrific conspiracy involving at least 26 people. – Oddthinking Jan 9 '14 at 1:54

Browse other questions tagged .