4

I have seen this article floating around http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/10486479/Phobias-may-be-memories-passed-down-in-genes-from-ancestors.html

Pretty much they state that if a parent is traumatized, the child could be born with a phobia.

Researchers at the Emory University School of Medicine, in Atlanta, found that mice can pass on learned information about traumatic or stressful experiences – in this case a fear of the smell of cherry blossom – to subsequent generations.

In the study, which is published in the journal of Nature Neuroscience, the researchers trained mice to fear the smell of cherry blossom using electric shocks before allowing them to breed. The offspring produced showed fearful responses to the odour of cherry blossom compared to a neutral odour, despite never having encountered them before.

The article seems very straight forward with it's conclusions, but it leaves me skeptical as it disagrees with everything that I understand about genetics.

  • 1
    Does "everything you understand about genetics" include epigenetics? What is it in the original paper that you are skeptical of? – EnergyNumbers Dec 16 '13 at 14:49
  • 3
    I don't understand the title. Is the question "Can developed phobies be passed down to children?" – Oddthinking Dec 16 '13 at 15:03
  • 2
    @EnergyNumbers I don't think i have sufficient background in to judge the paper. All I am saying is that I find the claims extrasensory – Andrey Dec 16 '13 at 16:31
  • This is research-level so it’s unanswerable here. That said, I’m extremely sceptical of these results, and this is the general attitude towards that conclusion. In a nutshell, they don’t show conclusively how the phobia is supposedly inherited and whether that “inheritance” would be passed down to further generations. The argument being made is that it’s trans-gerational epigenetic (= non-genetic) inheritance. But I don’t believe that. – Konrad Rudolph Dec 18 '13 at 10:46
  • Also, just to clarify: the paper claims that the phobia is not genetic, and it doesn’t say anything about natural selection, so the title to this question is totally wrong. Please fix it. – Konrad Rudolph Dec 18 '13 at 10:49
2

This question has remained unanswered yet not closed, so I'll give it a go.

First of all, a clarification regarding the title. If phobias are genetic, by definition they can't be created in a generation and inherited. The term epigenetic is the one that might have led to this confusion, so I'll start by defining it.

1. Epigenetics

Epigenetics is the study of changes in the expression of genes caused by certain base pairs in DNA, or RNA, being "turned off" or "turned on" again, through chemical reactions (source). Epi means outside or around, so epigenetics is not genetics as you might define it. These changes happen at a genomic level, but they don't involve a change in the nucleotide sequence. The best example of epigenetics is the fertilized egg cell or zygote, that divides and changes into all the different cell types in an organism (muscle cells, neurons, epithelium). They do this by activating some genes while inhibiting the expression of others.

The best definition is probably Arthur Riggs':

[Epigenetics is] the study of mitotically and/or meiotically heritable changes in gene function that cannot be explained by changes in DNA sequence.

2. Can mice inherit fears applied to their predecedssors?

The study you cite affirms they can. Even a third generation of mice seemed to reject the smell as well, which makes for quite shocking news:

The third generation of mice — the ‘grandchildren’ — also inherited this reaction, as did mice conceived through in vitro fertilization with sperm from males sensitized to acetophenone.

The problem with the study is that it failed to figure out a mechanism by which this could happen. And without knowing the molecular mechanism behind it, there is no choice but to remain skeptic.

3. A partial conclusion

This is undoubtedly a breakthrough discovery, the possibility of imprinting associations such as this in a gamete is simply astonishing. From an evolutionary point of view, it can make sense that (in some way we don't understand yet) some signals regarding experience can be transmitted to our descendants and somehow help in their survival.

The cited study belongs to epigenetics because this information cannot be stored at a nucleotide level. Unfortunately, and as I previously mentioned, without knowing the details of the mechanism we can't categorically affirm these mice inherited the information associated with a traumatic experience.

Even in a laboratory context, there are too many unknown variables we might be missing. One important one has been brought up by Martin Johnsson, and it has to do with the study using two groups of mice, one subjected to the scent and the other one not, and their descendants. If you divide individuals into two groups, you need to be sure that there are not genetic differences between the founders of the two groups. This is not clarified in the study, and could potentially explain the supposed 'inheritance' if no other reason comes to light.

So to summarize: The experiment seems to affirm it's possible. However, without a mechanism we are left with too many unknowns to consider this a proven theory.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .