enter image description here

This Volvo Trucks ad shows actor and martial artist, Jean-Claude Van Damme, performing a suspended split between two moving trucks, driving in reverse.

I tend to think that what we see in the video is quite real, however impressive. But perhaps I'm gullible and missing something. Am I or is this "for real"?

  • There's also a little teaser trailer here.
    – user5582
    Nov 14, 2013 at 19:51
  • Volvo seems to be doing a series of these stunts. I saw this one first.
    – Flimzy
    Nov 15, 2013 at 0:43
  • 2
    Jean-Claude Van Damme claims to have done this in only 1 take. Aren't the truck drivers the ones that deserve credit here?
    – BaGi
    Nov 15, 2013 at 10:27
  • 10
    Chuck Norris can do this stunt without trucks. Just floating down the highway... Nov 16, 2013 at 21:30
  • 2
    @LarryOBrien Chuck Norris does a split between two airplanes with a dozen skydivers on his hat lit as a Christmas tree. You don't believe me? youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9W82sMSMJJg
    – Sklivvz
    Dec 20, 2013 at 9:56

2 Answers 2


According to "How Volvo Created the Jean-Claude Van Damme ‘Epic Split’ Video":

Van Damme, 53, was hooked to safety lines that aren’t visible in the film, and each foot is on a small platform that was built on the trucks’ side mirrors.

Van Damme’s feet aren’t secured to the mirrors, video director Andreas Nilsson said, “but we had him rigged so that if he would fall off he wouldn’t die obviously. We didn’t want to be responsible for killing the Muscles from Brussels.”

I checked, to the best of my abilities, for discontinuities or any unexplained shadows, reflections, backing-up lights not being on, light/shadow on JCVD's face, etc. and couldn't find any. It doesn't help that the sun light is from behind. However, perhaps there is a technique to identify some CGI being used in certain areas of the frame. (Perhaps covering up some cables, although they could also be hidden behind him or in his pants.)

(One remaining doubt: the relative height of the trucks, seemingly changing around 0:36, which might be explained by the right truck moving slightly faster? Or is this explained by the moving away of the left truck, at that time?)

From the movement of JCVD's pants bottoms as they fall from his boots (from 0:41) it can also be deduced that it is very unlikely that the film was played backwards (in case you were wondering).

Note that it is relatively difficult for a combination truck to drive backwards in an extremely accurate fashion. (Try parking backwards with something attached to the back of your car, let alone driving in this fashion.) However, the combination truck on the right "only" has to keep a straight line (possibly helped by the Volvo system that's being advertised), whereas the left truck is rigid, and therefore much easier to manoeuvre. This is the only truck, in the video, that moves away to accommodate the split.

There's (now) also a press release by Volvo Trucks.

I almost forgot: Unless JCVD's whole career was faked, there's isn't much reason to doubt his "splitting abilities".


Yes it's real, as real as anything you see on TV or in the Cinema these days.

Lets start from the beginning, the term "6th Live Test" refers to the fact that Volvo have been running a series of adverts showing off their latest trucks/technology. For example, the 2nd live test refers to a hamster's ability to steer their trucks and the 3rd live test refers to their trucks ability to out maneuver some raging bulls through a spanish city.

So we know that the phrase "6th live test" does not imply that JCVD had tried 5 times to do this stunt, it instead refers to the 6th commercial Volvo have put out there to show off their trucks and associated technology.

There is a behind the scenes video on youtube, which captures JCVD's response to the stunt being explained, and some other footage which, albeit possibly staged, seems genuine enough to imply that the stunt was indeed carried out as described.

I find no immediate reason to believe that this stunt was faked, or carried out in any way but that described in the above video. There appears to be no CGI, nor external straps or supports. However, that is not to say that some good post-production could not hide such things from the viewer.

  • I found the behind-the-scenes footage unconvincing, because it appears to be (poorly) scripted. "Uh, we are going to drive forward, of course..." and these questions would have been answered well before the day of shooting.
    – Oddthinking
    Nov 16, 2013 at 3:09
  • 3
    Its not poorly scripted, its just JCVD's normal acting ;) BTW im a huge fan!
    – Jamiec
    Nov 16, 2013 at 8:59
  • No, it isn't the stilted delivery I am complaining about. I think it is the script's fault he is being seen to ask such an obvious Dorothy Dixer.
    – Oddthinking
    Nov 16, 2013 at 11:33

You must log in to answer this question.