An article in The Sun describes how wild dogs near Moscow have been living in the suburbs, yet commuting daily to the city via trains.

These complexes were used by homeless dogs as shelters, so the dogs had to move together with their houses. Because the best scavenging for food is in the city centre, the dogs had to learn how to travel on the subway — to get to the centre in the morning, then back home in the evening, just like people.

The article does not contain any references, aside from mentioning and quoting "Dr. Andrei Poiarkov, of the Moscow Ecology and Evolution Institute". Yet googling for Dr. Poiarkov simply returns dozens of sites that all share the same article as The Sun (most seem to be word-for-word copies).

Is this story true? Have the same specific dogs been observed getting onto a train, and then disembarking at the same stop day after day?

For bonus points, is there any truth to these two other claims made by the article:

The Moscow mutts are not the first animals to use public transport. In 2006 a Jack Russell in Dunnington, North Yorks, began taking the bus to his local pub in search of sausages. And two years ago passengers in Wolverhampton were stunned when a cat called Macavity started catching the 331 bus to a fish and chip shop.

  • I have seen youtubes of birds doing it, I don't know if it's intentional, partially intentionally, or random behaviour. youtube.com/watch?v=aUa6roo5qHQ
    – Wertilq
    Apr 19, 2013 at 19:11
  • I'm wondering if these dogs pay the ticket! +1, interesting question, though. Apr 19, 2013 at 19:18
  • Wouldn't "stray" be more adequate word than "wild"? These are not forest animals.
    – vartec
    May 18, 2015 at 19:26
  • @vartec To me, the implication of "stray" is that it was raised by humans, but then was left on its own, whereas wild refers to fully feral (instead of "forest"). The article (sadly now behind a paywall) did not go into the specific origins of the individual animals, so I'm not sure we can say one term is correct and the other is not without additional data.
    – Beofett
    May 18, 2015 at 21:59
  • Related: an apparently well-documented story about a dog in Seattle that rides a bus. npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/01/13/377023829/… May 19, 2015 at 6:50

1 Answer 1


A Moscow stray on the subway.

The Sun piece is likely to be lifted form The Financial Times article written by Susanne Sternthal1 on January 16th, 2010. The FT article is well researched and, we assume, fact checked, citing Andrei Poyarkov (note the different transliteration) and Andrei Neuronov as primary sources. Both are published writers, and Poyarkov a respected scientist. Sternthal quotes Neuronov, who says that:

there are some 500 strays that live in the metro stations, especially during the colder months, but only about 20 have learned how to ride the trains. This happened gradually, first as a way to broaden their territory. Later, it became a way of life.

The number 20 appears to be a guesstimate, but the phenomenon of dogs riding the Moscow metro is documented extensively. There is even a website which collects photos and little anecdotes of the encounters at metrodog.ru.2 More photos can be found in a blog post on socialphy.com,3 also a source for the image in the header. Video footage and reportage shot by ABC News in 2010, can be found on the network's site.4

The earliest English language reference I could find appears on darknessatnoon.blogspot.com, in 2007.5 In Russian, an article by N.N. Meshkova titled "Homeless Dogs in Moscow Metro" appeared in Biology bulletin #47, in 2000.6 Meshkova, who is a psychologist on the faculty of the Moscow State University, confirms the canine ability to take "goal-oriented subway rides." Having followed several individual dogs through the city, she observes one that rides back and forth from station to station begging for food, dogs that change trains to reach a specific destination, and dogs that visit the same above ground location regularly, using the subway (true commuting). In one instance, she writes:

A dog was observed riding from station "Lenin's Library" to "University" (5 stops, about 15 minutes), taking the central stairs and then an escalator to the street, where it headed to the nearby farmer's market. At the market, it approached the tent of a sausage vendor, and sat in front of it. The seller was not in, and so the dog, after waiting a few minutes, began to bark. A woman poked her head out from the adjacent tent, saw the dog, and said: "You came? Well, you'll have to wait. Lyuda (the name of the absent seller) will be back shortly." Having returned, the sausage vendor fed the dog and explained to the observer that it has been appearing regularly at this market for about half a year. (Translation mine.)

Finally, let me note that I personally saw lone dogs ride the subway in Moscow and in Bucharest on several occasions. It seemed to be a normal enough occurrence for people to ignore it completely.

  1. https://www.google.com/search?q=Susanne+Sternthal+moscow+metro+dogs+financial+times&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
  2. http://web.archive.org/web/20150518183512/http://metrodog.ru/
  3. http://web.archive.org/web/20150518183022/http://www.socialphy.com/posts/off-topic/13644/Moscow-Subway_s-Stray-Dogs.html
  4. http://web.archive.org/web/20150518183217/http://russian.rt.com/inotv/2010-03-16/Bezdomnie-passazhiri-moskovskogo-metro
  5. http://web.archive.org/web/20150518183337/http://darknessatnoon.blogspot.com/2007/03/metro-dogs.html
  6. http://web.archive.org/web/20150518183421/http://bio.1september.ru/article.php?ID=200004711

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .