Are there any differences in either sex which are provably beneficial and/or detrimental to their driving abilities?

Also, is it possible that stereotypical gender roles make any difference in driving ability?

For example: Men stereotypically tend to take women on dates where the man drives the car and pays for the meal. A greater number of dates could make them accustomed to driving while distracted (if they're interested in the girl, they're probably distracted).

For balance: Women have less testosterone and are stereotypically less aggressive than men, which may prevent them from succumbing to "road rage".

Are there any studies showing that either gender is more prone to accidents?

  • 6
    Date-driving-experience seems a bit far fetched. I'm guessing any real differences are attributable to men stereotypically being the drivers overall which would lead to significantly more driving practice, completely unrelated to whether or not they were on a date at the time. Other marginal factors might include that men generally have higher visuo-spatial abilities (beneficial), and are generally more prone to take risks (detrimental). I don't know how that trade-off balances out, but the effects should be small anyhow. Obligatory disclaimer about bell curves, big overlaps etc etc... Commented Mar 31, 2011 at 8:10
  • 1
    When I was young, which is longer ago than I care to admit, my observation was that bad male drivers tended to be overconfident and overaggressive, while bad female drivers tended to be inexperienced and timid, and good drivers of either sex tended to be similar. Come the late 1960s, I stopped noticing that effect. Commented Mar 31, 2011 at 23:45
  • Differences are always between two, not in either sex. Commented Jul 3, 2011 at 7:52
  • Interesting topic. Another thing to factor in is that men seem to enjoy driving more and see it as part of their male identity; while women, on the other hand, tend to see driving more as a way of simply getting from place to place. My boyfriend does the driving when we're in the car because he enjoys it; I, on the other hand, am happy to relinquish the driving to him. From this orientation, I would say that men may be more skillful drivers, but not necessarily better drivers. It depends on how you define "better." If the ability to win road races is your definiton, then the award would usuall
    – Surprise
    Commented Feb 5, 2012 at 1:50
  • 1
    Considering your other question, maybe women just drive more carefully because they know they'll have to pay more for a new car. Commented Apr 20, 2022 at 19:04

2 Answers 2


Sex differences in driving and insurance risk (by The Social Issues Research Centre, 2004)

Men and women exhibit different driving behaviours that affect their attitudes, safety and insurance risk. Many factors underpin these differences, including neurochemical structures and hormonal processes shaped by evolution, and global socialisation practices. Each plays a part in explaining why men and women drivers have very different records in relation to accidents and insurance claims.

  • Differences between male and female drivers in terms of crash rates are evident in a wide range of countries, including the United States, Europe, Asia and Africa, with males being significantly more at risk than females.

  • There is extensive evidence to show that men, and young men in particular, tend to be more aggressive than women (in all known cultures) and they express aggression in a direct, rather than indirect, manner.

  • Levels of deviant (rule-breaking) behaviour are significantly higher in men than in women. This manifests itself in a greater frequency of violation of traffic regulations, including speed limits, traffic controls, drink-driving, etc.

  • Men also exhibit, on average, higher levels of sensation-seeking and risk-taking in a wide variety of settings. The basis for this well-established sex difference has a hormonal and neurochemical basis – it is not simply a product of socialisation or experience.

  • A report published by the Department of Gender and Women’s Health at the World Health Organisation has called for recognition of these fundamental differences between men and women drivers and the development of gender-differentiated policies in relevant areas.



Men and women are different. In terms of driving behaviour, the differences can be seen clearly in the greater propensity of males to take risks, exhibit aggression and seek thrilling sensations. The results of these differences are highlighted very clearly across the globe in higher accident statistics, more expensive and frequent insurance claims and higher rates of convictions for offences such as dangerous and drink-driving.

These differences may be shaped by socialisation, but they are rooted in more fundamental factors. Evolutionary psychology provides a strong basis for sourcing many of these back to the little-changed cognitive structures required by our hunter-gather ancestors.

the authors believe there is overwhelming evidence that propensities towards certain types of behaviour, including less-safe driving, are ‘hard wired’ in men.

The paper cites a lot of studies. They are referenced on the last six pages. Way too many to include them here.

  • 4
    +1 for the insurance risk answer. However, "skill" is not defined in the question, so do we also need to consider other interpretations of skill, such as success in competions (Formula 1, Indy Car etc)? Very few women comppete at the highest level in these sports, does that imply a lower level of skill, or just a lower level of interest?
    – name removed
    Commented Mar 31, 2011 at 10:31
  • 7
    woman are more likely to have minor crashes then men while men are more likly to cause the big bills according to why men pay more in the uk. car-accidents.com/pages/car-crash-men-woman.html
    – Andy
    Commented Apr 1, 2011 at 7:49
  • 4
    @Andy That matches up with what I've witnessed in my own life. My female friends have far more accidents and tickets than my male friends, but they're all relatively minor things (15mph over, running red lights, fender benders). However, when the males DO crash or get a ticket, it's a HUGE one (doing double the speed limit, crashes that rip the car in half, etc). Commented Apr 1, 2011 at 12:39
  • 4
    I'm rather unimpressed at the limited extent this paper deals with the major confounding variable of men being more likely to do (professional and personal) long-distance and rural driving, accounting, to some extent, for a difference in the types of accidents and fatality rates.
    – Oddthinking
    Commented Jun 11, 2011 at 7:17
  • 4
    One of the key problems with using insurance claims is that it fails to account for number of miles driven. Naturally someone on the road 3 hours a day is more likely to get into a big accident than someone on the road 3 hours a month. Long-distance also tends to increase speed and hence risk. I am not saying the resulting trend will be different, but distance traveled needs to be accounted, as well as the type of vehicle.
    – Michael
    Commented May 15, 2016 at 21:55

A key effect is vision. Women have better night vision (more rods) but males have better depth perception (more cones). Both are relevant to driving, but in different circumstances.

However, older females are more likely to recognize the limits of their vision.

  • 1
    I think females in general (not just older) are more likely to recognize the limits. Myself and my male friends don't think twice about driving at night, but all the female friends I can think of are afraid of driving at night because they don't feel that they can see well enough. They always make one of the males drive at night. If the above statement involving vision is correct, that could be the worst possible situation! Commented Apr 1, 2011 at 12:41

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .