3

Background

Without getting in too much details and going off-topic, I just want to say I personally find that the idea of time travel is ridiculous, at least in the current frame of physics and our understanding of time.

The case

While I was on Facebook I stumbled upon a page called Time Travel is 100% Real, they claim that

Actual, 3D Time Travel (As in Back to the Future). It is achieved and suppressed.

They go on about theories by a scientist called Dr. David Lewis Anderson and videos were he claims that he has built equipments and has done research that proves the possibility of time travel.

I looked into the articles and the videos and they provide no actual data or real accessible references, they (the page and some of the videos/articles/books) justify that by saying that those are

for anyone still living in the mainstream (media, textbooks etc) illusion of lies.

Question

Is there any evidence of time travel discovery?

closed as not constructive by Sklivvz Feb 6 '13 at 20:33

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 15
    We all travel in time. Forward, at a constant speed ;-) – vartec Feb 6 '13 at 9:50
  • 5
    I don't see a notable claim at that facebook page. It all seems pretty vague. – RedGrittyBrick Feb 6 '13 at 9:58
  • 8
    @vartec - Forward at variable speed, remember the time dilation effects as you go faster! :) – rjzii Feb 6 '13 at 14:56
  • 2
    Do you have to wear those red and blue glasses for it to work? – Ferruccio Feb 6 '13 at 15:30
  • 18
    I think this is a duplicate of a question asked in 2015. – Andrew Grimm Feb 6 '13 at 20:33
6

Viral marketing alert!

Googling around for this name shows that while there are several cross-referencing Websites there is no indication of external original material or reporting. There are claims that are prima facie bogus ("USAF credits him with discovering time-travel...") and claims that associate "Anderson" with highly-dubious existing claims ("the Philadelphia Experiment").

An easy claim to refute: there are no USPTO patents (much less time-travel-related ones) issued to "David Lewis Anderson."

  • 2
    I'm familiar with searching my name for patents in that interface, so I know it is very sensitive for exact matches. To find my granted patents, I need to do a search for the patents that include my middle name and again for the ones that don't. So I don't find this particular "absence of evidence = evidence of absence" argument very persuasive. – Oddthinking Feb 6 '13 at 23:17
  • I'd be remiss not to mention the Cheapass game U.S. Patent No 1 board-game here. The players are all inventors, rushing to be the first to perfect their time-machines, so they can go back to 1790, and be the first in line at the patent office to patent time-machines and thwart the others. – Oddthinking Feb 6 '13 at 23:20
  • 2
    @Oddthinking Yes, you're right about the PTO search sensitivity. If the question were re-opened perhaps I would just move the bulk of my answer to a comment. The question falls apart very quickly in the face of a minute or two of Googling -- there doesn't seem to be any interesting "grain of truth" to it. – Larry OBrien Feb 6 '13 at 23:25

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .