Frequently there is some banter about the risk associated with adjuvants by people who consider vaccines more dangerous than beneficial. If a given vaccine lists an adjuvant that is toxic in isolation, how can I find out if it is inert or otherwise harmless in the overall composition of the vaccine?

  • Could whomever explain the vote to close?
    – mfg
    Feb 25 '11 at 16:36
  • "Questions on Skeptics are expected to generally relate to challenging a belief or truth, within the scope defined in the faq." I don't see how this relates to challenging a belief or truth. Mar 1 '11 at 4:57
  • @Jason Adjuvants are frequently discussed among vaccine supporters/opponents as not/disease causing agents.
    – mfg
    Mar 1 '11 at 14:19
  • Oh, I wasn't aware of that. I might suggest re-wording your question to mention it explicitly; as it is, it just seems like a question about vaccines rather than a question related to a belief about vaccines. I would withdraw my vote to close if I could. Mar 1 '11 at 16:03
  • Water is toxic in high doses. So the question is rather a non-sequitur.
    – JasonR
    Jan 20 '16 at 19:45

The important principle of toxicology here is

The dose makes the poison

by Paracelsus.

You have to find out the quantity of the adjuvant to compare it to known safety data. You can check Material safetey data sheets (MSDS) for those substances, or directly search for safety studies about those substances, e.g. on Pubmed.

The quantity of most additives in vaccines is very small, far below dangerous amounts.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .