Dr. Drew Pinsky, a medical doctor who hosts several television and radio programs, claims quite frequently that most people who engage in sex-related industries, such as prostitution or pornography, have experienced sexual abuse as a child.

Is there any evidence to support this claim?

  • 3
    This is a very good question. A substantial one, and should get an answer. – Vass Mar 22 '11 at 16:37
  • I suspect there is not conclusive evidence one way or the other on this, but I agree it is a good question. – anthony137 Mar 22 '11 at 17:53
  • Maybe you want to reword the title to "significant proportion" instead of "significant number"? Read Rachel Lloyd's Girls like Us if you want a number of sex abuse and sex trade stories. Or, are you asking about (in a relative sense) self-employed sex workers? – gatoatigrado Feb 9 '12 at 19:03
  • "most" would be very hard to prove. "a significant number" certainly have. Don't confuse this with the even harder question, does sexual abuse as a child CAUSE people to become sex-workers. – Michael Bishop Mar 17 '12 at 0:31
  • 2
    My employer did a study on the sex industry and human trafficking (a study on both things, not a statement that the two are the same). The conclusions of those who worked on it was that, at the very least, hard data on the number of sex workers who are "victims" versus those who are "entrepreneurs" or what have you simply doesn't exist. All claimed numbers they could find demonstrated obvious conflicts of interest and fell into a strongly bimodal distribution: either authors were attacking the sex industry, and so everyone was a victim, or defending it, and almost no one was. Food for thought. – KRyan Jan 2 '15 at 16:50
up vote 24 down vote accepted

A new study that I just found says that there apparently is no difference between pornography stars and the general population (i.e. the "damaged goods" hypothesis). From the abstract:

The damaged goods hypothesis posits that female performers in the adult entertainment industry have higher rates of childhood sexual abuse (CSA), psychological problems, and drug use compared to the typical woman. The present study compared the self-reports of 177 porn actresses to a sample of women matched on age, ethnicity, and marital status. Comparisons were conducted on sexual behaviors and attitudes, self-esteem, quality of life, and drug use. Porn actresses were more likely to identify as bisexual, first had sex at an earlier age, had more sexual partners, were more concerned about contracting a sexually transmitted disease (STD), and enjoyed sex more than the matched sample, although there were no differences in incidence of CSA. In terms of psychological characteristics, porn actresses had higher levels of self-esteem, positive feelings, social support, sexual satisfaction, and spirituality compared to the matched group. Last, female performers were more likely to have ever used 10 different types of drugs compared to the comparison group. A discriminant function analysis was able to correctly classify 83% of the participants concerning whether they were a porn actress or member of the matched sample. These findings did not provide support for the damaged goods hypothesis.

An article on Slate discusses this a little more, and notes:

Stern’s routine line of questioning has fueled the perception that all porn performers are victims of child sexual abuse, and that their career choices are the result of this unresolved past trauma.

So this is more a case of confirmation bias and (as the Slate article states) some of the acresses lying.

Of course, this is a limited study in pornography (and I think even just the US industry). This does not cover prostitution and other sex industry workers.

This was too long for a comment, but I wanted to add this into the discussion.

I was able to find a reference for you:

Studies have indicated that childhood abuse characteristics are associated with different sexual behavior outcomes for men and women. For example, Senn et al. (2007) found that for men, sexual abuse with force and penetration was associated with greater frequency of sex trading than it was for those who reported abuse without force and penetration. The term sex trading has been defined as participating in sex in return for food, money, sex, or shelter (Newman, Rhodes, & Weiss, 2004). Senn et al. (2006) found that women were more likely than men were to report exchanging sex for money or drugs and a childhood sexual experience that involved force.

The periodical quoted is: http://www.faqs.org/periodicals/201004/2004709811.html

And the article used by its reference (Senn et al., 2007) can be found at:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2042031/

Senn, T. E., Carey, M. P., Vanable, P. A., Coury-Doniger, P., & Urban, M. (2007). Characteristics of sexual abuse in childhood and adolescence influence sexual risk behavior in adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 637-645.


Note that this links sex trade workers with sexual abuse victims. It does not suggest, as Dr. Pinsky stated, that most people in sex-related industries experienced abuse.

  • 5
    Technically it doesn't link sex workers with sexual abuse, it does the opposite. That is duck is a bird, but not all birds are ducks. That's where you're going with that, I just want to make sure it's clear :) – Russell Steen Mar 22 '11 at 20:39
  • 38
    @Russell: It is not even that; it is only a correlation, not an implication. That is, there is a correlation between being a bird and quacking, but that is not to say that one caused the other; perhaps there is an underlying cause. Perhaps children of poverty-stricken families are more likely to experience sexual abuse, and perhaps poor people are more likely to trade sex for money. In that case, it's possible the prostitution is unrelated to the sexual abuse; they are both results of an underlying cause. – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft Mar 22 '11 at 22:28
  • @blue - Good point. – Russell Steen Mar 22 '11 at 22:29
  • 8
    Seriously? "The term sex trading has been defined as participating in sex in return for ... sex". Doesn't that, by definition, make all forms of sex, "sex trading". – Kibbee Nov 29 '12 at 16:03

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .