3 added 62 characters in body
source | link

No, because of epigenetic effects it's unlikely that a child that spent 9 month in the womb of an average mother who lived thousand years ago would be well adapted for today's world.

Over most of human history, people didn't have enough to eat.

If you randomly take a child from history there is a good chance that food for its mother wasn't plentiful.

After the Dutch famine of 1944 we sawsaw that the children of mothers who carried them during that time were more likely to get diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease, microalbuminuria and other health problems.

Viral antibodies that a child gathers during pregnancy are also important to allow the child to deal with the illnesses of their environment.

Despite this, given the nature of viral evolution, it's unlikely that the child from history would suffer any worse in that regard than a modern child.

No, because of epigenetic effects it's unlikely that a child that spent 9 month in the womb of an average mother who lived thousand years ago would be well adapted for today's world.

Over most of human history, people didn't have enough to eat.

If you randomly take a child from history there is a good chance that food for its mother wasn't plentiful.

After the Dutch famine of 1944 we saw that the children of mothers who carried them during that time were more likely to get diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease, microalbuminuria and other health problems.

Viral antibodies that a child gathers during pregnancy are also important to allow the child to deal with the illnesses of their environment.

Despite this, given the nature of viral evolution, it's unlikely that the child from history would suffer any worse in that regard than a modern child.

No, because of epigenetic effects it's unlikely that a child that spent 9 month in the womb of an average mother who lived thousand years ago would be well adapted for today's world.

Over most of human history, people didn't have enough to eat.

If you randomly take a child from history there is a good chance that food for its mother wasn't plentiful.

After the Dutch famine of 1944 we saw that the children of mothers who carried them during that time were more likely to get diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease, microalbuminuria and other health problems.

Viral antibodies that a child gathers during pregnancy are also important to allow the child to deal with the illnesses of their environment.

Despite this, given the nature of viral evolution, it's unlikely that the child from history would suffer any worse in that regard than a modern child.

2 Grammar and understanding clarification
source | link

No, because of epigenetic effects it's unlikely that a child that spent 9 month in the womb of an average mother who lived thousand years ago would be well adapted for today's world.

Over most of human history, people didn't have enough to eat.

If you randomly take childrena child from history there is a good chance that footfood for it'sits mother wasn't plentyplentiful.

After the Dutch famine of 1944 we saw that the children of mothers who carried them during that time gotwere more likely to get diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease, microalbuminuria and other health problems.

Viral antibodyantibodies that a child gathers during pregnancy are also important to allow the child to deal with the illnesses of his enviromenttheir environment. Given that viruses evolve a lot in relatively short time frame

Despite this, given the nature of viral evolution, it's likelyunlikely that the child wouldn'tfrom history would suffer because he isn't well prepared for today's worldany worse in that regard than a modern child.  

No, because of epigenetic effects it's unlikely that a child that spent 9 month in the womb of an average mother who lived thousand years ago would be well adapted for today's world.

Over most of human history, people didn't have enough to eat.

If you randomly take children from history there a good chance that foot for it's mother wasn't plenty.

After the Dutch famine of 1944 we saw that the children of mothers who carried them during that time got more diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease, microalbuminuria and other health problems.

Viral antibody that a child gathers during pregnancy are also important to allow the child to deal with the illnesses of his enviroment. Given that viruses evolve a lot in relatively short time frame it's likely that the child wouldn't suffer because he isn't well prepared for today's world.  

No, because of epigenetic effects it's unlikely that a child that spent 9 month in the womb of an average mother who lived thousand years ago would be well adapted for today's world.

Over most of human history, people didn't have enough to eat.

If you randomly take a child from history there is a good chance that food for its mother wasn't plentiful.

After the Dutch famine of 1944 we saw that the children of mothers who carried them during that time were more likely to get diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease, microalbuminuria and other health problems.

Viral antibodies that a child gathers during pregnancy are also important to allow the child to deal with the illnesses of their environment.

Despite this, given the nature of viral evolution, it's unlikely that the child from history would suffer any worse in that regard than a modern child.

    Notice added Citation needed by Sklivvz
1
source | link

No, because of epigenetic effects it's unlikely that a child that spent 9 month in the womb of an average mother who lived thousand years ago would be well adapted for today's world.

Over most of human history, people didn't have enough to eat.

If you randomly take children from history there a good chance that foot for it's mother wasn't plenty.

After the Dutch famine of 1944 we saw that the children of mothers who carried them during that time got more diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease, microalbuminuria and other health problems.

Viral antibody that a child gathers during pregnancy are also important to allow the child to deal with the illnesses of his enviroment. Given that viruses evolve a lot in relatively short time frame it's likely that the child wouldn't suffer because he isn't well prepared for today's world.