3 fix link
source | link

Cuadrilla Resources was the company responsible for the fracking operation. They have now released a report, Geomechanical Study of Bowland Shale SeismicityGeomechanical Study of Bowland Shale Seismicity, 2 Nov 2011, confirming that it caused the earthquakes.

In the report there are a number of factors that were said to have contributed to the seismic events, including the following:

  • There was a pre-existing critically stressed fault.
  • The fault was "transmissible" so accepted large quantities of fluid.
  • The seismic events were induced after repeated injection of fluid into the same fault zone.

The report states that repeat occurrences are unlikely at future well sites and gives magnitude 3 as a worst-case scenario.

Cuadrilla Resources was the company responsible for the fracking operation. They have now released a report, Geomechanical Study of Bowland Shale Seismicity, 2 Nov 2011, confirming that it caused the earthquakes.

In the report there are a number of factors that were said to have contributed to the seismic events, including the following:

  • There was a pre-existing critically stressed fault.
  • The fault was "transmissible" so accepted large quantities of fluid.
  • The seismic events were induced after repeated injection of fluid into the same fault zone.

The report states that repeat occurrences are unlikely at future well sites and gives magnitude 3 as a worst-case scenario.

Cuadrilla Resources was the company responsible for the fracking operation. They have now released a report, Geomechanical Study of Bowland Shale Seismicity, 2 Nov 2011, confirming that it caused the earthquakes.

In the report there are a number of factors that were said to have contributed to the seismic events, including the following:

  • There was a pre-existing critically stressed fault.
  • The fault was "transmissible" so accepted large quantities of fluid.
  • The seismic events were induced after repeated injection of fluid into the same fault zone.

The report states that repeat occurrences are unlikely at future well sites and gives magnitude 3 as a worst-case scenario.

2 Made company name and report name more explicit.
source | link

TheCuadrilla Resources was the company responsible for the fracking operation has. They have now released a report, reportGeomechanical Study of Bowland Shale Seismicity, 2 Nov 2011, confirming that it caused the earthquakes.

In the report there are a number of factors that were said to have contributed to the seismic events, including the following:

  • There was a pre-existing critically stressed fault.
  • The fault was "transmissible" so accepted large quantities of fluid.
  • The seismic events were induced after repeated injection of fluid into the same fault zone.

The report states that repeat occurrences are unlikely at future well sites and gives magnitude 3 as a worst-case scenario.

The company responsible for the fracking operation has now released a report confirming that it caused the earthquakes.

In the report there are a number of factors that were said to have contributed to the seismic events, including the following:

  • There was a pre-existing critically stressed fault.
  • The fault was "transmissible" so accepted large quantities of fluid.
  • The seismic events were induced after repeated injection of fluid into the same fault zone.

The report states that repeat occurrences are unlikely at future well sites and gives magnitude 3 as a worst-case scenario.

Cuadrilla Resources was the company responsible for the fracking operation. They have now released a report, Geomechanical Study of Bowland Shale Seismicity, 2 Nov 2011, confirming that it caused the earthquakes.

In the report there are a number of factors that were said to have contributed to the seismic events, including the following:

  • There was a pre-existing critically stressed fault.
  • The fault was "transmissible" so accepted large quantities of fluid.
  • The seismic events were induced after repeated injection of fluid into the same fault zone.

The report states that repeat occurrences are unlikely at future well sites and gives magnitude 3 as a worst-case scenario.

1
source | link

The company responsible for the fracking operation has now released a report confirming that it caused the earthquakes.

In the report there are a number of factors that were said to have contributed to the seismic events, including the following:

  • There was a pre-existing critically stressed fault.
  • The fault was "transmissible" so accepted large quantities of fluid.
  • The seismic events were induced after repeated injection of fluid into the same fault zone.

The report states that repeat occurrences are unlikely at future well sites and gives magnitude 3 as a worst-case scenario.